اسم المؤلف:
ايفيان كريم عبد الحسن الجشعمي
اسم المشرف:
مشرق محمد مجول الجبوري | سعد حسن عليوي
المستخلص:
يهدف البحث الحالي الى تعرف اثر اسلوبي الترادف والتضاد في تنمية الثروة اللغوية في مادة المطالعة والنصوص لدى طالبات الصف الثاني المتوسط، ولغرض التحقق من هدفي البحث صاغت الباحثة الفرضيات الاتية : 1.لا يوجد فرق ذو دلالة احصائية عند مستوى دلالة ( 0,05 ) بين | That read (reading) a privileged position among the branches of the Arabic language, it is knowledge and a window individual key in looking at their human thought and science in all fields, they are the foundation of the human personality and a way of everyone to form tendencies and trends, they also contribute to fill the leisure time and the renewal of mental activity this in turn pushes the students to love reading development and access leading to increased linguistic wealth, and the importance of reading studied (reading) of our schools are still experiencing weakness and remarkable attention to little in this lesson, Vatalibp suffer from some of the problems may be due to the method of teaching followed by the school or the difficulty of Article scheduled and this in turn leads to lack of motivation of students toward understanding the texts and familiar with the receipt of operational information, that's considered a researcher to subject my style (tandem and contrast) within the method of teaching reading (reading).Target Search : 1.other tandem style of vocabulary development in the subject of reading texts and the second grade students average.2.other contrast in style vocabulary development in the subject of reading texts and the second grade students average.research assumes : 1.las there is a difference is statistically significant at the level of significance (0.05) between the average level students the first experimental group who were studying reading material and text style tandem, and the average score of the control group students who are studying material and reading texts in the usual way in vocabulary development.2.las difference is significant statistically significant at the level (0.05) between the average second level students the experimental group who were studying reading material and text style antagonism, and the average score of the control group students who are studying material and reading texts in the usual way in vocabulary development.3.las there is a difference is statistically significant at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores first experimental group who were studying reading material and text style tandem, and between the average scores of the experimental group who are studying the second reading material and text style antagonism in vocabulary development.search limits : Reduce human - Sample From middle and high schools in the province of Babylon center. - Sample Of second grade students in the average middle and high schools in the province of Babylon, Center for the academic year (2015 - 2016).Scientific limit /Specific - modoat of book reading and texts by the Ministry of Education, Second grade average, namely : (a sword and the pen, Hussein bin Ali (peace be upon him) and the free bin Yazid al - Tamimi, a lament mother, Justice based King, the effects of smoking, Syria, the Levant heart of the Arab homeland spring, Anbar Upper Euphrates basin and the Arab desert traveler Ibn Battuta).To achieve the aim of the research researcher chose determined experimentally a part - tuning of the three groups (Altjeribitan and control) and chose randomly medium Euphrates for girls to be an arena for discussion, and the number of people three divisions (and chosen Division (b) were randomly assigned to represent the first experimental group and number (29 students), which studied material reading the texts in a manner tandem, was chosen Division (a) were randomly assigned to represent the second experimental group and number (31 students), which studied material reading and text style antagonism, was chosen Division (c) to represent the control group and the number of her students (28 students), which studied material reading and texts the way normal.The researcher conducted a parity in the number of variables between students of the three research groups (Altjeribitan and control group), namely : 1.alamr time for the students measured in months.2.drjat Arabic language at the end of the first semester of the academic year testing (2015 - 2016).3.althesel school for parents.4.althesel school for mothers.5.achtbar linguistic wealth.The researcher drafted (60) behaviorally target of topics studied in the duration of the experiment, the researcher has prepared daily plans for the teaching of the three research groups.The search tool was tested in the vocabulary prepared by the researcher development, the number of paragraphs (20) paragraph of the multiple choice type, and the researcher realized the test and persistence of sincerity, as well as the level of difficulty paragraph and strength distinguished and effective alternatives is the right to test vocabulary development.The tool applied researcher on three research groups after the end of the probation period, which lasted eight weeks, it began in the day on Tuesday 23/02/2016 and ended on Tuesday, a brief summary of 26/04/2016.The same researcher studied three research groups, the researcher has used the following statistical methods : (One - way analysis of variance, and Chi - square, and Pearson correlation coefficient, and Spearman correlation coefficient - Brown, the equation difficulty paragraph coefficient, and the equation of discrimination paragraph coefficient, and the equation of effective alternatives is correct, the way Hevah).The researcher found the following results : 1.tvouk students second experimental group that studied contrast to the style of the other two groups.2.tvouk first experimental group that studied the reading and texts in a manner tandem to the control group, who studied in the traditional manner.In light of the findings the researcher made the following recommendations : 1.alahtmamPalmtradvat linguistic and antonyms when teaching reading and texts as two methods have proved their effectiveness in teaching and have achieved great success by the results that appeared in the vocabulary development.2.tdman assessments for the teaching of Arabic language books Bmradfat words and Mtdhadadtha in order to broaden the minds of students and facilitate the curriculum for linguistic Theruten development.3.on into account while teaching students mental abilities by giving them adequate opportunity to exercise their role during the lesson.4.dharorh reading material and texts and to give them timely care, and the concentration of effort on the students and not only on the large number of subjects.5.ges researchers to expand the use of these methods, as they have a positive effect on the students.6.dharorh individuals over quota for the teaching of reading and texts, and interest in and to provide libraries for external reading.7.xiaodh attention skillfully reading in various grades.8.tuaah administrators Arabic language intermediate and secondary stages of the importance of employing these two methods when teaching the Arabic language all of its branches, and work to increase interest in their use.9.dharorh revisit the curriculum and the decisions of the Arabic language in middle school in terms of observance of individual differences among students and working on language Theruten development.10.tamam lesson plans pursued by the researcher in this research on the Arabic language teachers in order to benefit from them
