Author name:
عباس فاضل عباس
Supervisor name:
سافرة ناجي جاسم
Abstract:
Ideology shapes the theme of man’s struggle. Because it represent the conflict of different wills about a subject. So it is really one of man’s struggle ways in the existence, and it’s his dramatically problem with it. It becomes the motive to many philosophers and writers. As theatre considers one of mind’s systems, which discovers the clash dimension, and it rests on it, the ideology frames on his ideas, which the theatrical texts declare this or that ideology through an aesthetical investment. And with in, the playwright states his attitude about any human matter, as the fate and human being, the problem between the authority and a person, religion complex and other intricate which were a space of resistance and contradiction.The playwright offered his aesthetical ideology based on his dramatically dealing that developed according the time needs, and the conception and political problems. In order to get the full cognitive of aesthetical and intellectual ideology delivered, the researcher divided his research to four chapters index of references, appendix of names and dating of publishing of Muhi Addin Zankana’s plays.The first chapter contains the problem of research which concentrated on the relationship between the theatre and its technique, then its relationship with people to embody their dreaming and agony, and leads to look for the dramatically structure distinguishof Zankana’s texts. And how the ideology appears inside the texts. The importance of research is to study the creative achievement of one of Iraqi dramatist significant, which we see that can add more knowledge. And be useful to theatrical studiers, and to the theatrical foundations.The aims of research : discover the characteristic of Zankan’s texts through technique and ideology. The limit of the research restricted locally in Iraq where Zankana had written all his plays. And chronically in the dramatic texts which published from ( 1859 - 2002 ). And objectively, it is a study and analysis of the technical structure and the intellectual of Zankana’s texts. The second chapter comprises the theoretical framework and previous studies and its discussion. It includes three topics. The first one heeds to the dramatic structure notion and reviews the dramatic structure of theatrical text from Aristo to these days. Historically, talkingabout the methods of writing plays. Second topic pays attention to the ideological meaning and its relationship to society classes. The relationship between the ideology and artists, and how it reflects in their works, the position of government authority from the opposites.The third topic is discussed the text connotation, then the text language structure, and the text semantically structure. The third chapter includes the research procedures which embraces the research society that involves Zankana’s plays, which extended around fourty years. Limit locally and temporally and broach to search method. The tools depend on the indicators that bring out the theoretical framework, as the main tool to analysis the samples, and to realize the research goal and solves its problem, reaching toscientific result. The chapter holds two fields of research, first, the dramatic structure of Zankan,s texts. Second, the ideology, how it is reflected inside the texts, and inside the playwright himself.The chapter four implies the results that the researcher reached, through analysis Zankana’s plays, which declare that Zankana used many methods from traditionalism to experimentalism to reach wider horizons. He was effected by Brecht, using his method to break out the traditional plot, push people to think about what is going on the stage, not to identify with it. Discussing the tragedy concept which destroys the heroes. Zankan’s interesting to the poetic prose, and to range his dialogue between dramatic and narration, because he wrote both plays and stories. And to put the idea of the character before its art structure.The conclusion of the research attained that Zankana is an ideological playwright, but he was not the type of writers that ideology can limit his work or capture his creation. His erudition and the high human feeling helped him to put the ideology under his hand, not the opposite. Ideology appears in his works through his choosing characters, their dialogue, actions. He was not talking friendly when he descried the capitalism class and its political or economical representatives. He strips of their sick behaviors, their slavery tobenefits and privileges, and how easy for them to commit the crimes without twinge of conscience. But he changed his situation, when he descried poor people. He is kind, a friend, caring them the best human feeling and actions. They sacrificed themselves to the others, refusing the injustice, and revolted against it
