Author name: يحيى كريم احمد القيسي

Supervisor name: سميرة محمود حسين النداوي

General topic: Educational Sciences

Specific topic: Methods of Teaching History

Degree: Master

University: University of Baghdad - Faculty Of Basic Education - Department Of History

Language: Arabic

University location: Baghdad

First pages:

اثر استراتيجيتي العصف الكتابي والجدول الذاتي في تحصيل مادة التاريخ وتنمية التفكير الابداعي عند طلاب الصف الخامس الادبي == The Effect of Brain - Writing and Self - schedule On Assimilating The Subject of History And Developing Creative Thinking In The Fifth - Stage Students / literary Branch

Author name: مجيد حميد ابراهيم الحديدي

Supervisor name: بشرى حسن مذكور | داود سلمان الزبيدي

General topic: Educational Sciences

Specific topic: Methods of Teaching History

Degree: Doctorate

University: University of Baghdad - Ibn Rushd College Of Education For Human Sciences

Language: Arabic

University location: Baghdad

First pages:

Author name: فراس زبون شلش الجيزاني

Supervisor name: عبد الكريم خيطان حسن الياسري | كوثر جاسم عبيد

General topic: Educational Sciences

Specific topic: Methods of Teaching History

Degree: Doctorate

University: University of Baghdad - Ibn Rushd College Of Education For Human Sciences

Language: Arabic

University location: Baghdad

First pages:

Abstract: يهدف هذا البحث الى معرفة ( اثر انموذجي ديوت وزاهوريك في اكتساب المفاهيم التاريخية وتنمية مهارات التفكير الاستدلالي لدى طلاب الصف الاول المتوسط) وللتحقق من هدف البحث وضع الباحث فرضيتين رئيسيتين ثم لكل منهما فرضيات فرعية بحسب ما ياتي : - اولا - لا يوجد فرق ذ | The objects of this research to know(The Impact Of Two Methods Of Duyet And Zahorik In The Acquisition Of Historical Concepts And Inferential Thinking Skills Development At 1st Class Students (Intermediate)). To verify the purpose of this study the researcher has put a major two assumptions and each of which sub - hypotheses according to the following : - First - there is no difference statistically significant between the average scores for the students of the three groups who study the history test in the acquisition of the dimensional concepts.To achieve this hypothesis formulated the following sub - hypotheses : - 1 - There is no statistically significant difference between the average scores first experimental group students who are studying history to conform to the form Duyet and between the average scores of the control group students who are studying the same material in the traditional way to test the acquisition of the dimensional concepts.2 - There is no difference statistically significant between the average scores second experimental group students who are studying history to conform to the form and Zahorik between the average scores of the control group students who are studying the same material in the traditional way to test the acquisition of the dimensional concepts.3 - There is no difference statistically significant between the average scores first experimental group students who are studying history to conform to the form Duyet and the average score second experimental group students who are studying the same material according to Zahorik model to test the acquisition of the dimensional concepts.Second : There is no difference statistically significant between the average scores of the three groups, students who are studying history in the test deductive dimensional thinking. To achieve this hypothesis formulated the following sub - hypotheses : - 1 - There is no statistically significant difference between the average scores first experimental group students who are studying history to conform to the form Duyet and between the average scores of the control group students who are studying the same material in the traditional way to test the dimensional deductive thinking.2 - There is no difference statistically significant between the average scores second experimental group students who are studying history to conform to the form and Zahorik between the average scores of the control group students who are studying the same material tested in the traditional way of thinking deductive posttest.3 - There is no difference statistically significant between the average scores first experimental group students who are studying history to conform to the form Duyet and the average score second experimental group students who are studying the same material in accordance with the model in the test Zahorik dimensional deductive thinking.Follow the researcher determined experimentally with the setting of the arbitrator type designs a control group design by randomly allocated to individuals and two tests before me and after me.And chose researcher Qsidia Directorate breeding Baghdad / Karkh first of six directorates, and the same way was chosen medium Zulfikar boys for the purpose of application of the experiment where, was chosen three people than the average first - grade students at random from among four divisions : (a - b - d) In the same way it has been identified Division (b) to represent the first experimental group, and the Division of (a) to represent the second experimental group, and the Division (d) to represent the control group.The number of respondents (90) student of (31) students in the first experimental group studied Bonmozj Duyet, and (29) the second student in the experimental group studied Bonmozj Zahorik, and 30 students in the control group studied the traditional way. It was parity between the three groups in the variables procedure (the level of intelligence test, and test prior knowledge of history, and testing of deductive reasoning skills, and chronological age measured in months and the rate of the previous academic year 2012 - 2013).It was coined researcher behavioral objectives and plans of teaching in the light of the requirements of the search , and then the acquisition of historical concepts and test deductive thinking to suit the nature of the search test which lasted full academic year of the day on Sunday 13/01/2013 until 08/05/2014 brief summary on Thursday, after statistical treatments was reached following results : 1. There were statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average grades students three research groups, in the acquisition of the historical development of concepts and deductive reasoning skills.2. There is no statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores first experimental group students and average students grades Group II trial to test the acquisition of historical concepts.3. There were statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores first experimental group students and the average score in the control group students test the acquisition of historical concepts, and in favor of the first experimental group.4. There were statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores second experimental group students and the average scores in the control group students test the acquisition of historical concepts, and in favor of the second experimental group.5. There is no statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores first experimental group students and average grades Group II students in the experimental test deductive thinking.6. There were statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores first experimental group students and the average score of the control group students in creative thinking test, and in favor of the first experimental group.7. There were statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores second experimental group students and average grades students in the control group test of creative thinking, and for the second experimental group.To complement the current study, the researcher concludes : 1. Teaching models can be given to students learning an important role in the educational process.2. Teaching models can contribute to the development of higher mental ability when the learners, including inferential thinking, because the steps models makes it imperative for the educated know the concept and then perceive.3. Harmony teaching models with modern educational trends that make the learner at the center of the educational process and its basis.4. The teaching through the use of models makes the learner more interested and interesting lesson.5. That teaching and learning concepts promise a primary objective for the teaching of any material, including the study of history.The researcher recommended the following recommendations : 1. Zahorik benefit from the model in the teaching process does not Issal course material into the minds of students.2. The need for school teachers and guidance material ancient history to the possibility of the adoption of a typical (Duyet and Zahorik) in the teaching of the history of ancient civilizations average first grade.3. The need for teachers and urged teachers to pay attention to history by highlighting the general concepts and sub instead of conservation and indoctrination to the first grade average students.4. Intensification of scientific seminars and meetings between supervisors and teachers of history to demonstrate the importance typical of (debt and Zahorik) in the classroom to acquire historical perceptions of first grade average students.5. Teachers of history and directing Madrsadtha to adopt typical of (Duyet and Zahorik) in the development of the skills of deductive thinking among students of the first grade average.The researcher suggested the following proposals : 1. study to determine the impact of a prototypical Duyet and Zahorik in other styles of thinking, such as creative thinking - thinking contemplative - critical thinking - scientific thinking, and other patterns of thought.2. Study of Marafhother is typical Duyet Zahorik and in other variables such as trends and tendencies toward history - correct historical concepts Katih - retain Article historical - motivation toward history.3. The study to determine the impact of a prototypical Duyet and Zahorik in other Kalaptdaiah and universities and preparatory stages of the study.

Summary:

References: