Author name:
عبير قاسم جبر الزبيدي
Abstract:
shall be treasury of knowledge which is a source of ideas and action, The act of human is a reflection , an expression and embodiment of the need, or desire. in the field of architecture, the design action is a result of the need for human safety , and self - realization, and the social and psychological needs, therefore, shelter of the first human needs, express the idea of first body reaction (the product of intellectual and physicist), varied between spontaneous and intentional : the planning and thinking preconditions for his idea, function, and method of installation elements and parts, according to what provided to him by intuitive logic of the board of formality, and the installation of the elements and materials provided by the surrounding environment. The idea was to model the architectural design for a variety of experimental methods of possible alternatives, and became the first structural model, which tried the alternatives and possibilities it is the model (fixed) within a spatial environment. technological first designing act consists of spontaneous Technologyrepresenting the factors of chance and subjectivity, and the process of repeating the form of productive to make it objectively, and traditionally the advancement of technology and its evolution, dominated by aspects of intentionality, guidance utilitarian, and substantive output, but man still seek spontaneous ways of thought embodies the products of creative spontaneity of the self, and the other overlap and coincide with the utilitarian aspects. This formulated the general problem of research as follows : try to reach a clear vision about the relationship between Spontaneity and intentionality in human action, and through the knowledge presented in the first quarter, research has come to formulate a knowledge problem then propose hypothesis as follows : What is the relationship between Spontaneity and intentionality in the designing act? And What is the role of subject of place in that relationship? Were assumptions reflect the main objective of the research and that the classification of the possible relationships between both sides of the spontaneous and intentionality and determine the factors underlying those relations and formulations following : major premise : the relationship between Spontaneity and intentionality in the act of Architectural Design is one of the relations of the three : overlap or match or contrast. The Secondary assumption : The type of the relationship between Spontaneity and technological intentionality in the act of Architectural Design deepened on : self creativity in dealing with the subject and the properties of place.Accordingly, the search mode theoretical framework included the chapters I and II, where the first chapter discusses the vocabulary of human action, and the concepts of Spontaneity and intentionality of technology, according to object and subject, and between ration and experience and referred to the concept of creativity as an act of self - conscious and explained the beginnings of a relationship between the spontaneity and intentionality in the Place. The second chapter dealt with the concept of place and definition of the most important characteristics, givens, on aspects of subjective and objective in the spatial characteristics, and their relationship to the creativity of self in the act of architectural design, and then draw the most important vocabulary and knowledges of the theoretical framework through the third chapter, which ends with two sets of indicators, the first group of indicators helps for analytical overview of the examples of (Chapter IV), which included : first housing in the villages of northern Iraq, and the school of the Baghdad, and the Pyramid of Cheops at Giza - Egypt, and the building of the Louvre Abu Dhabi, and the Centre for arts and music Abu Dhabi, and the building of Chinese television in Beijing, and units of student accommodation in Marseille - France. While the second group of indicators helps to test the validity of the hypothesis of the research, through two ways , first by the analytical tables and charts, and the second by the questionnaire (a comprehensive set questions posed to experts in architectural field).then the research ends with conclusions and recommendations, which revolves around the following points : classification of the relations between Spontaneity and technological intentionality in the act of architectural design, and (creativity of the self in addressing the subject) and subject (place), and dealing with the final conclusions of the points on the relationships of self - characteristics of the place where the designer especially based on the perceptions and experience, an attempt to highlight the impact of self in the act of architectural design and re - focus on their potential creativit.
