عرض: 25 50 75 100 النتائج

نتائج البحث: 3 من أصل 28

جهود ابي علي الشلوبين النحوية في حواشيه على المفصل The efforts of Abu Ali Alshlubin grammatical in his footnotes on Almofassal

اسم المؤلف: رياض مهدي عباس كاظم
اسم المشرف: محمد اسماعيل عبد الله
الموضوع العام: اللغة العربية وادابها
السنة: 2018
الموضوع الدقيق: اللغة
الدرجة: ماجستير
اللغة: العربية
مكان الجامعة: بابل
الصفحات الاولى:
المستخلص: لاشك في ان الاطلاع على جهود علماء العربية في الدرس اللغوي عموما والدرس النحوي على وجه الخصوص، ومحاولة فحصها وتدقيقها يمثل غرضا جديرا بالبحث والدراسة، وفي هذا الشان كان لتوفيق الله ومنه ان وقع اختاري على دراسة جهد واحد من علمائها النابهين الذين كان لهم مشاركة واسعة في الدرس النحوي، وباع طويل في خدمة العربية بالمغرب والمشرق، وهو الاستاذ (ابو علي الشلوبين) في حواشيه على كتاب (المفصل) للزمخشري، ببحث وسم فيما بعد بـ (جهود ابي علي الشلوبين النحوية في حواشيه على المفصل) ، وقد اشتمل على دراسة : نتاجه النحوي، وارائه واجتهاداته في المسائل النحوية ، وما كان له من اثر في دراسات لاحقيه. وقد اقتضت طبيعته ان يكون منقسما على ثلاثة فصول , مهدت لها بدراسة اسباب عناية الاندلسيين ومنهم الشلوبين بكتاب (المفصل) للزمخشري , والحاشية وتطورها في التاليف النحوي .وشمل الفصل الاول دراسة (منهج الشلوبين في تاليف حواشي المفصل) في مباحث ثلاثة : اولهما : - طريقته في التاليف , وثانيهما : موارده في التاليف , وثالثهما : وسائل التوثيق عنده (اصول النحو) ،وخصصت الفصل الثاني بدراسة اجتهاد في (حواشي المفصل) , وقد اشتمل على ارائه النحوية التي انفرد بها وارائه التي اعترض بها على الزمخشري وبعض النحويين ،اما الفصل الثالث فتناولت فيه (شخصية الشلوبين العلمية في (حواشي المفصل) , وقد اشتمل على ثلاثة مباحث : اولهما : مذهبه النحوي , وثانيهما : تاثره بالنحويين السابقين واثره في اللاحقين , وثالثهما : ما يؤخذ عليه في حواشي المفصل والحقت الفصول المذكورة انفا بخاتمة ذكرت فيها اهم النتائج التي توصل اليها البحث, ثم اعقبتها بقائمة المصادر والمراجع التي اودعتها كتب النحو قديمها وحديثها, وكتب القراءات القرانية , والدواوين الشعرية .وقد توصلت هذه الدراسة الى نتائج متعددة منها : • ترجع عناية الاندلسيين ومنهم الشلوبين بكتاب (المفصل) للزمخشري الى اسباب منها : الاتجاه السائد بشرح الكتب المشرقية وتسهيل مهمتها للدارسين والمهتمين بعلم النحو .• اعتمد الشلوبين في تاليف حواشيه على منهج كتاب (المفصل) للزمخشري ، ولم يسلك طريقا خاصا به في التاليف، اذ وضع شروحه وحواشيه على نسخته من المفصل من دون تقديم او تاخير .• اتسم اسلوب الشلوبين في (حواشي المفصل) بسمات منها : الاسهاب في شرح جملة من نصوص (المفصل) ، والاختصار في شرح جملة منها ، كما اتسم ايضا بالدقة والابتعاد عن التعسف والتاويل وسهولة العرض .• استعمل الشلوبين - كغيره من النحويين - اصول النحو من سماع وقياس واجماع، لاستنباط القواعد النحوية واقرارها وترجيح ما يراه مناسبا من الاراء . • اظهر البحث ان للشلوبين اجتهادات نحوية تنوعت بين مسائل نحوية انفرد بها واخرى اعترض بها على الزمخشري وبعض النحويين .• عرض الشلوبين للمسائل الخلافية بين البصريين والكوفيين ، واظهر البحث انه كان ميالا الى البصريين في مذهبه النحوي ، اذ انتصر لرايهم في اكثر المسائل الخلافية التي تناولها | There is no doubt that the knowledge of the efforts of Arab scholars in the linguistic lesson in general and the grammatical study in particular, and the attempt to examine and scrutinize it is a worthy purpose of research and study, and in this regard I chose to study the effort of one of the prominent scientists who had a wide participation in The grammar lesson, and a long sale in the service of Arabic in Morocco and the Levant, the professor (Abu Ali Alshlubin) in his footnotes to the book (Almofasal) of Zamzarchi, research and marking later on (the efforts of Abu Ali Shlubin grammatical in the footnotes on the Almofasal), and included a study : Grammar, and opinions and hard work in touch Grammar, and the impact it has on the studies of the ethical . It has divided it into three chapters. It has been prepared to study the reasons for the attention of Andalusians, including the shalubin with the book (Almofasal) of Zamzarchi, and the footnote and its development in grammatical composition ,The first chapter included a study : the method of the shalubin in the composition ( Hawashi Almofasal) in three studies : The first is his method of authorship and the second is his resources in authorship and the third is his grammatical origins, The second chapter was devoted to the study of the diligence of the shalubin in (Hawashi Almofasal). It included his grammatical opinions, which were unique to him, and his opinions which he objected to al - Zamakhshri and some grammarians, The third chapter dealt with the personality Al - shalubin scientific in Hawashi Almofasal), and included three questions : First, his grammatical doctrine, and secondly, he was influenced by the former grammarians and his influence on the later, and thirdly : what is taken in (Hawashi Almofasal), The chapters mentioned above have been concluded with the conclusion of the most important findings of the research, including the following : • The attention of the Andalusians, including the shalubin book (ALmofasal) of Zamkshari, for reasons including : the trend of explaining Oriental books and facilitate the task of scholars and those interested in the science of grammar.• The footnote is a type of grammatical authorship directly or the explanation of the text, which is a lengthy explanations called by the phenomenon Almtun and annotations, and aims to clarify what the ambiguity of Mtun or annotations.• The Alshlubin was adopted in the composition his footnotes of on the approach of the book (ALmofasal) of Zamkshari, and did not follow a path of his own in the author, as he put his annotations and his footnotes on the copy of book (ALmofasal) without submission or delay.• The method of Alshlubin in the ( Hawashi almofasal) features such as : Extensive explanation of a set of texts (ALmofasal), and short explanation of a sentence, and was also accurate and away from arbitrariness, interpretation and ease of presentation.• Alshlubin - like other grammarians - used the grammatical principles of hearing, measurement and consensus, to devise grammatical rules and to adopt them and to make appropriate views.• The research shows that the shalubians had grammatical arguments, ranging from grammatical issues to singular ones, to which they objected to Zamakhshari and some grammarians.• The shalubin presentation of the controversial issues between the Basrien and the Kufis, and the research showed that he was inclined to the Basrien in his grammatical doctrine, and won their opinion in the most controversial issues dealt with

الجهد الصرفي بين ابن ابي الحديد (ت656ه) وابي الحسين يحيى بن حمزة الحسيني (ت749ه) في شرحيهما لنهج البلاغة : دراسة موازنة The Literary Effort between Ibn Abi al - Hadid (d. 656) and Abu al - Husayn Yahya bin Hamza al - Husseini (d. 749 AH) in their commentary on the approach of Balajah

اسم المؤلف: تركي عطية صكبان خنياب الثرواني
اسم المشرف: امين عبيد جيجان الدليمي
الموضوع العام: اللغة العربية وادابها
السنة: 2018
الموضوع الدقيق: اللغة
الدرجة: ماجستير
اللغة: العربية
مكان الجامعة: بابل
الصفحات الاولى:
المستخلص: tahedv the message to make Morphological balancing my worlds of explaining the rhetoric approach to the Commander of the Faithful Ali bin Abi Talib, scholars (peace be upon him), namely Ibn Abi iron (d. 656 AH), and Abu Hussein Yahya bin Hamza al - Husseini (v 749 e). - mn the most prominent morphological issues which were over the research, namely : the sources, derivatives, and multitudes, and the meanings of the formulas whipped. - kadd was the choice of these issues, they occupy more space than other issues scattered here and there in Alhrahin, where scientists talked about other issues, but it was unilaterally, and did not take them, we do not check the budget Morphological. - The emphasis on the common texts among the participants, and they talked about, was a joint construction, Derivative or plural or meanings of formulas. - The thesis was based on an introduction, a preface, four chapters, and a conclusion. The introduction contained a detail that included the efforts of scientists and researchers who spoke about issues related to derivatives, masses, and the passive in the approach of rhetoric.B - - - The preface contains a brief summary of the life of the narrators, their writings, the sources to which the narrator returned, and the manner in which Sharhan used to present the morphological material. As for the first chapter, it was in the sources, and we have shown the sources in the common texts dealt with by the narrator, and we have shown the increase that came Husseini, and was separated in some matters of morphine sources, and added to the That Ibn Abi al - Hadid had elaborated on some issues in the sources, we find that Husseini summarizes the speech in it. As for the second chapter, it was in the derivatives, from the name of the actor, the name of the verb, and the formulas of exaggeration, knowing that the derivatives were not presented to all of them, because the developers did not talk about all the derivatives, but talked about some of them in common texts. We have seen the trace of the impact of al - Husayni to Ibn Abi al - Hadid, either by literal follow - up, or by an increase on Ibn Abi al - Hadid. As for the third chapter, it was in the masses, and filled a large area of the message, where the issues were common between them greater than the rest of the other issues, and the crowds to gather Salem male, and the collection of Salem women, and cracking groups, and the fracture masses of the most common in which t As for the fourth chapter, - C - it was in the meanings of the formulas added, and these formulas did not talk about all of them, but talked about some of them, and we have shown the views of ancient scientists and modernists in the meanings of formulas, as well as the link between the old and modern issues of morphology, On every issue, and try to root issues by reference to the mothers of books and what the ancients, as well as what the modern references on this issue or that. The conclusion, however, highlighted the most important results that came either from an agreement between the participants, or from a difference between them in the matter of verbatim, or by increasing one of the candidates to the other in a statement of a matter.The reliance in the letter on the explanations of the approach of rhetoric, namely the explanation of the approach of the rhetoric of Ibn Abi Hadid, and Debug al - Wudi in the disclosure of the secrets of the words of the guardian of Yahya bin Hamza al - Husseini. - We ask God to help us to serve the language library, and to make in our work this benefit to scholars who come from after us, and God reconcile

ظاهرة المحال في النحو العربي The Phenomenon of Impossible in Arabic Grammar

اسم المؤلف: سهاد محمد جواد عبد الحسين الحسناوي
اسم المشرف: اسيل عبد الحسين حميدي الخفاجي
الموضوع العام: اللغة العربية وادابها
السنة: 2018
الموضوع الدقيق: اللغة
الدرجة: ماجستير
اللغة: العربية
مكان الجامعة: بابل
الصفحات الاولى:
المستخلص: Praise belongs to God, the lord of all being. Blessings and peace be upon the most noble of Messengers, the Prophet Mohammad and on his kinsman and disciples.The one who contemplates Arabic speech finds a high level of diction, rhetoric and eloquence. It truly was the speaker's identification and tongue expressing his desires and feelings to reach the level that every Arabian speaker aspires to reach to.This speech was glorified and honored when God made it the language of the Holy Quran. So, our scholars were keen to keep it away from the non - Arab tongue in order to preserve the holy words of God from mistakes and solecism and show its meanings. There is no doubt that when our scholars made the rules of Arabic language, they have established rules and principles that govern the grammatical theory, from which there could be no derogation, by our scholars such as AL - HADHRAMI (died in 117 H.), ESSA BIN OMAR (Died in 149 H), ABI AMRO BIN AL - ALAA (Died in 154 H.), AL - KHALEEL BIN AHMED AL - FARAHIDI (Died in 175 H.) and SIBAWAIH (Died in 180 H.) who could write a grammar book.The importance of this study is lied in the fact that it reveals one of the terms discussed by the scholars to describe what was incorrect grammatically so that it would reflect on meaning negatively. Therefore, I have preferred to be familiar with the speech that is impossible to be uttered by the Arabs as it is incorrect in terms of structure and meaning. I wanted to state the impossible speech against the possible one. The study was limited to the grammatical level and semantic level. As the old scholars' linguistic term means syntax and semantics, the thesisCis titled "the phenomenon of impossible speech in Arabic Grammar".I have faced a lot of difficulties during writing this research representing in the concept itself and how to find references as it has not been tackled by most of grammarians, it does not include all grammar items and the vocable "impossible" has many meanings; some mentioned it as impossible and others may mention it as refrained or corrupted, or sometimes not allowed as well as the vocable "impossible" that was developed by grammarians was not justified in some places so that it becomes a burden on the researcher, but I have done my best to be acquainted with it through getting information from AL - KHALEEL and all the way to Dr. FADHIL AL - SAMARRAEE. Previous related studies are : the phenomenon of prohibition in Arabic Grammar (a Master thesis) written by MAZIN ABDULRASOOL and supervised by Prof. Dr. KHADEEJA AL - HADEETHI, prejudice in the linguistic lesson (a PhD. Thesis) written by NAJLAA HAMEED MAJEED and supervised by Prof. Dr. RAHEEM AL - HASNAWI and " SIBAWAIH'S Concept of impossibility : its dimensions and controls for Dr. LATEEFA IBRAHIM AL - NAJJAR".The research includes an introduction, a preface, four chapters and a conclusion.In the introduction, I have dealt with "the concept of impossible" linguistically and idiomatically and I have stated its evolution. Moreover, I have put the lights on who had the lead in referring to it and stating it as well as its synonyms.The first chapter is under the title of : "impossible in the predicate" which includes two topics : the first one is theDimpossible in the nominal structure and the second topic is the impossible in verbal structure. I have discussed, In both topics, the impossible in the subject and predicate, verb and subject , operator, infinitive and Present participle.The second chapter is "the impossible in the non - predicate elements (redundancy)", where it contains two topics : the first one is "the impossible in objects" and the second one is "the impossible in semi - objects". In both topics, I have dealt with the grammatical questions in which the impossible was mentioned in the section of "the object, adverbs, vocative and exception.The third chapter is "the impossible in prepositions"", where it contains three topics : the first one is "prepositions of single letters" such as ف , ك , ل and others; the second one is "prepositions of double letters " such as اذ , ان , لا. The third one is " prepositions of triple letters" such as اذا , وان , واي and others.The fourth chapter is "the impossible in styles and other issues" which is in two topics : the first one is divided into two sections . The first one is "the impossible in styles" such as the interrogation, conditionals, exclamation and superlatives. The second one is "Effects of the speech structure" in terms of fronting and backing, indication and deletion. The second topic is " impossible in miscellaneous issues" such as relative pronouns and clauses, the agreement of two different requests on the infinitive in one case, combine two definite nouns and others.After those chapters, there is a conclusion including the most important results reached by the researcher which are the following : E1. The research has indicated that AL - KHALEEL IBN AHMED AL - FARAHIDI is the first one who refers to the impossible in his book "AL - AIN", then his student SIBAWAIH has given details about the impossible in his book. And IBN JINI in the chapter "impossible and its characteristics".2. It was clear for the researcher that the impossible is a term named by old grammarians to describe the incorrectness, it has not been called by the name impossible but refrained, corrupted, groundless, not possible and not allowed. i.e. every impossible is not allowed but not every not allowed is impossible.3. The research proved that there are impossible due to structure (composition) and impossible due to meaning because the speech is for a meaning and a benefit and if it was out of benefit, it would be impossible according to the grammarians' view.The researcher has taken her information from many references such as Al - Kitab for SIBAWAIH, Al - Muqtadhab for AL - MUBRAD, Al - Usool in Al - Nahoo for IBN SIRAJ, Al - Eidhah for ABI ALI ALFARISI, Al - Nahoo Al - Wafi for ABBAS HASAN as well as Maani Al - Nahoo for FADHIL AL - SAMMARAEE and others.After all that, I pastorate myself to Allah for helping me to complete this work.