البحث — المستودع الرقمي العراقي

نتائج البحث: 2 من أصل 127

قلق الحرب وعلاقته باستراتيجيات المواجهة لدى طلبة الجامعة == War Anxiety And Its Relationship With Coping Strategies Among Students Of Baghdad University

اسم المؤلف: اسماء عبد المجيد ولي الصالحي

اسم المشرف: ناجي محمود ناجي النواب

الموضوع العام: علم النفس

السنة: 2016

الموضوع الدقيق: علم النفس التربوي

الدرجة: ماجستير

الجامعة: جامعة بغداد - كلية التربية ابن الهيثم للعلوم الصرفة - قسم العلوم التربوية والنفسية

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: بغداد

الصفحات الاولى:

المستخلص: يهدف البحث الحالي التعرف على : • قلق الحرب لدى طلبة الجامعة.• الفروق في قلق الحرب على وفق المتغيرات (الجنس، المرحلة، التخصص).• استراتيجيات المواجهة (الاستراتيجية المركزة على المشكلة والاستراتيجية المركزة على الانفعال) لدى طلبة الجامعة.• الفروق في استرا | The current research objective is to identify war Anxiety among the students of the university and Also identify the differences in war Anxiety according to variables (gender, stage and major).and Identify the strategy of confrontation (strategy focused upon the problem, strategy focused upon passivity of the students of the university according to the variables (gender, stage and major). Correlation between Anxiety about war and confrontation strategies within the students of the universities the degree of contribution of focused confrontation strategy upon the problem and focused confrontation stategy upon passivity because of the Anxiety about war.The Sample of the research Consisted at (500) five hundred students (both male & female) from the second and fourth stages. The instruments which are used in this research were the measurement of war Anxiety of (Othman 1993). The researcher has extracted psychometric characteristics such as discrimination, validity both kinds; Face and empirical with an approach of the studying the relation of the degree of paragraph with total degree. regarding firmness, I extracted internal harmony in both approaches, retail midterm and alfa - Cronbach.The Second measurement; the measure of confrontation strategies of Lazarus & Volkmann - 1984. The researcher extracted psychometric characteristics of distinguishing and validity, apparent and empirical, besides firmness and internal harmony. Statistical tools that are used for the sconed test of single sample, two samples, analyzing of analysis of variance Regression Equation besides person Correlation confficient.After computing and anylizing data statistically, we have got the following results : Anxiety about war at the students of the universities was lessthan the average community. Confrontation strategies were higher at the students due to the society they belong. The relation of the Anxiety of war regarding strategy focused upon the problem and the strategy focused upon passivity were positive with moral indication. Regarding the possibility of prediction the Anxiety of War in both strategy focused upon the problem and the strategy focused upon passivity were possibility with indication upon prediction of Anxiety about war of both above strategies

الملخص:

المصادر:

اساليب التفكير وعلاقتها بالاتجاهات التعصبية عند طلبة الجامعة == Thinking Styles And Its Relation With Prejudice Attitudes Of University Students

اسم المؤلف: احمد محمد مرزوك

اسم المشرف: فاضل جبار جودة الربيعي

الموضوع العام: علم النفس

السنة: 2016

الموضوع الدقيق: علم النفس التربوي

الدرجة: ماجستير

الجامعة: جامعة بغداد - كلية التربية ابن الهيثم للعلوم الصرفة - قسم العلوم التربوية والنفسية

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: بغداد

الصفحات الاولى:

المستخلص: يستهدف البحث الحالي تعرف : • اساليب التفكير لدى طلبة الجامعة (اسلوب التفكير التركيبي، اسلوب التفكير المثالي، اسلوب التفكير الواقعي، اسلوب التفكير التحليلي، اسلوب التفكير العملي).• الفروق في اساليب التفكير لدى طلبة الجامعة وفق المتغيرات (الجنس، المرحلة، ال | The present research aims to know thinking styles of university students (Synthetic style, idealistic style, pragmatic style, analytic style, realistic style). Also identify the differences thinking styles according to variables (gender, stage, specialty). identify prejudice attitudes among university students. Also Differences in prejudice attitudes according variables (gender, stage, specialty). And The relationship between thinking styles and prejudice attitudes of university students and the extent of the contribution of each thinking style in forming prejudice attitudes.Sample of the research is composed of (400) students (both male and female) from the second and fourth stages and humanity and scientific colleges of Baghdad University The researcher used two scales, the first one is thinking style Scale for Jumaily (2013), and the second one to measure prejudice attitudes for Raheem (2006) and the researcher has extracted psychometric feature for both scales such as distinguishing, validity both kinds, face and empirical by using the studying the relation of the degree of item with total degree, and extracted internal harmony in both approaches, retail midterm and alfa - Cronbach for both scales in the research. The statistical methods that were used are (t - test for the two independent samples Pearson correlation coefficient, alpha Cronbach's equation, binary analysis of variance).After dealing with the data statistically, we got the following results : All thinking styles among university students is higher than the average of community thinking styles to which they belong, either which dealing with the differences did not Synthetic style and analytic style show significant differences according to the variables (gender, stage, specialty), while the idealistic thinking style and practical function and in favor of specialization humanitarian results show no significant differences with regard to gender and stage, either with the differences realistic style it was a function results in favor of specialization and humanitarian fourth stage and is a function for the raceAs for prejudice attitudes had men of the sample is less than that of the community to which they belong, while prejudice attitudes showed significant differences according to the variables gender and stage. The relationship between thinking styles and prejudice attitudes is not statistically significant.

الملخص:

المصادر: