اساليب التفكير وعلاقتها بالاتجاهات التعصبية عند طلبة الجامعة == Thinking Styles And Its Relation With Prejudice Attitudes Of University Students
Author name:
احمد محمد مرزوك
Supervisor name:
فاضل جبار جودة الربيعي
General topic:
Psychology
Specific topic:
Educational Psychology
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Baghdad - Ibn Al-Haytham College Of Education For Pure Sciences - Department Of Educational And Psychological Sciences
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
04T1493 - p.pdf
Abstract:
يستهدف البحث الحالي تعرف : • اساليب التفكير لدى طلبة الجامعة (اسلوب التفكير التركيبي، اسلوب التفكير المثالي، اسلوب التفكير الواقعي، اسلوب التفكير التحليلي، اسلوب التفكير العملي).• الفروق في اساليب التفكير لدى طلبة الجامعة وفق المتغيرات (الجنس، المرحلة، ال | The present research aims to know thinking styles of university students (Synthetic style, idealistic style, pragmatic style, analytic style, realistic style). Also identify the differences thinking styles according to variables (gender, stage, specialty). identify prejudice attitudes among university students. Also Differences in prejudice attitudes according variables (gender, stage, specialty). And The relationship between thinking styles and prejudice attitudes of university students and the extent of the contribution of each thinking style in forming prejudice attitudes.Sample of the research is composed of (400) students (both male and female) from the second and fourth stages and humanity and scientific colleges of Baghdad University The researcher used two scales, the first one is thinking style Scale for Jumaily (2013), and the second one to measure prejudice attitudes for Raheem (2006) and the researcher has extracted psychometric feature for both scales such as distinguishing, validity both kinds, face and empirical by using the studying the relation of the degree of item with total degree, and extracted internal harmony in both approaches, retail midterm and alfa - Cronbach for both scales in the research. The statistical methods that were used are (t - test for the two independent samples Pearson correlation coefficient, alpha Cronbach's equation, binary analysis of variance).After dealing with the data statistically, we got the following results : All thinking styles among university students is higher than the average of community thinking styles to which they belong, either which dealing with the differences did not Synthetic style and analytic style show significant differences according to the variables (gender, stage, specialty), while the idealistic thinking style and practical function and in favor of specialization humanitarian results show no significant differences with regard to gender and stage, either with the differences realistic style it was a function results in favor of specialization and humanitarian fourth stage and is a function for the raceAs for prejudice attitudes had men of the sample is less than that of the community to which they belong, while prejudice attitudes showed significant differences according to the variables gender and stage. The relationship between thinking styles and prejudice attitudes is not statistically significant.
Summary:
04T1493 - A.pdf
References:
04T1493 - R.pdf
