المستخلص:
The study of the history issue Eastern studies interesting too, being a make researcher living in the midst of the real conflict between the countries of Europe, especially that he does not exclude any country of Europe in this conflict, although the basis of the conflict on this subject is always between Russia and the State The Ottoman Empire is that we see within the scene of France, Britain, Austria and spins in the orbit of these countries, so it is not easy when you talk about conflicts Ottoman Russian to ignore any of them, whether individually or collectively, and the selection of the position of any country of this conflict is in But researcher chose France's position precisely the depth of this position that dates back to 1526, as France was the first Christian country in the world that I thought of using the power of the Ottoman Empire in its favor from the road with access treaties guarantee French interests there, As a result of the magnitude of those interests that feel France that those interests are to compete or risk they immediately move either diplomatically or militarily backed by sending officers to train the Ottoman army or fortify their coastlines to ensure the continued presence there It is worth noting that France throughout previous centuries not directly intervene militarily in the Ottoman Empire, that is, they do not send their armies to there only in the period of the Napoleonic Wars, which was an exception in the history of France, but after it has avoided direct conflict only after the intervention of the European countries combined As is the case in the Greek revolution, so what happened to push France to exploit the crisis holy places to work in this rush to fabricate a major crisis inevitable outcome of the military confrontation? Why coincided with the receipt of Louis Napoleon to power in France? How did Napoleon III of making Britain the biggest enemy to his uncle Napoleon an ally in the war is somewhat similar to the Napoleonic wars? What to pay the rest of the organization of the Conference of European us to remain silent and to resort to diplomatic quirks throughout the war? It is where the confidence came to Napoleo The midst of such a war? Is the insistence of the French people to change as we know it is always the name of Napoleon to send the military spirit of the new? Or is it something going on in the veins of each Bonaparte? Is it true that France fought the Crimean War on behalf of Britain? All this leads us to the big question is why France chose to support the Ottoman Empire with all my strength while she was able to exploit the expansion of Russia in the east to expand is in the West? . It is worth noting that in spite of the significant role they play France in the Ottoman Empire, which covered the book of foreigners after the British position and Russian, had not received adequate attention from Arab writers, most Arabic books that dealt Date Eastern Question was focused on the Russian position first The British Second, and then Austrian, and French was mentioned during its reception in the events superficially does not give any picture of the fact that position despite his dating back to year 1526, as it was shown that the French position continued to Britain, while the reality on the contrary just that, and the proof of this is that a lot of foreign books written about nurse British Florence Nayatnjal while not mentioned one she was working as a nurse helping to French surgeon general Levy, so felt researcher to take Multi Crimean War, which is the last dose offered France to the Ottoman Empire before finally falling. These study in four chapters, the first chapter dealt to the beginnings of the French - Ottoman before the emergence of Russia as a major power, and before the start of British relations Ottoman evidence at a depth of strategic thinking of the kings of France, and the primacy of France in the presence inside the Ottoman Empire and the resulting access to privileges , to address the researcher then to conflicts Ottoman Russian from the seventeenth century the onset of Russian power, and until the mid - nineteenth century any receipt of Louis Napoleon to power, and the conciliator French than that, and the resulting period of conflicts Ottoman Russian was lead to military confrontation direct between the two parties and the resulting including the loss of the Ottoman Empire for some territory which leads to increased Russian influence there, which negatively affects French interests within the Ottoman Empire, which pays to take a certain position depending on the seriousness of the situation and depending on the strength French government then, and hints researcher throughout this period to differences in the ways of the French rulers in dealing with such circumstances. The second chapter highlighted the circumstances that prompted the French to choose the candidate Albonaberta, and the exploitation of Louis Napoleon to this confidence to declare himself Emperor of France, and the impact of this action on the French policy of State, and thus to make the French in direct confrontation with Russia, the force that defeated Napoleon Bonaparte and restricted France for four decades earlier, taking advantage of an argument Russia's attempt to get a symbol of the French presence in the Ottoman Empire of the holy places, and the consequent conflicts diplomacy began a mission position smartphone is far taken by France of that, and recognize Napoleon III and perhaps his insistence on the inevitability of confrontation, the confrontation that was difficult for France that waged without Britain, so it was a Napoleon III to follow methods bold and dangerous, but of Shem Al Bonaparte to drag Britain out of conviction to enter into its own in that war unknown results, concludes Chapter massacre Sinop which gave the green light for France and Britain to move towards the Black Sea fleets to start since this point teamwork between the two countries. The Aferdna separate chapter is Chapter III of the military operations within Crimea, whether ground operations or freedom, they did not focus studies and research on all operations but they follow the diplomatic and moves, so the researcher moves the French army in the Crimea in detail and which culminated finally dropping Sevastopol, touching During that to the number of troops and weapons, as well as the dead and wounded of all parties to the conflict. The fourth chapter has dealt with diplomatic attempts that was carried out by all parties, the purpose of which is to extend the period of the war more than to end them, and the role of French diplomats in, and their influence on the course of discussions, which were mostly in Vienna, and the entry of Sardinia to the war, and attempts to Napoleon III in closer of Britain, and the subsequent visit Prince William husband of Queen Victoria to France, as well as the desire of Napoleon III to go to the Crimea, and the death of the Russian Tsar and its impact on the course of events to an end, and convergence Franco - British, which culminated visits cross - ownership between the two countries, to end Chapter end of the war and the Paris Conference and the results and decisions that resulted in the impact on the arena of European, to the search ends conclusion dealt with the most prominent reached researcher from the results, and a simple comparison between policy Francois I and Napoleon Bonaparte, Napoleon III toward France and the Ottoman Empire, either supplements were a map visualize the expansion and retreat of the borders of the Ottoman Empire throughout the period spanning 1359 - 1856.n III
اسم المشرف:
عباس حسين مجيسر الجابري
اسم المؤلف:
ود حنون هارون الموسوي
