Author name:
عمر محمد جنداري
Supervisor name:
عبود حسن عبود المهنا
Abstract:
تمحورت الرسالة حول خطاب ميشيل فوكو وطروحاته الفكرية واهم المراحل التي مر بها هذا الفيلسوف في حياته, وابرز الشخصيات التي اثرت في فكره ومن ثم على نتاجاته التي تضمنت مفهوم الخطاب في مختلف المجالات, وما يتخلله ذلك الخطاب من طروحات ذات حقائق معرفية وسلطوية ماد | The current study dealt with Michel Foucault's discourse, his materialistic psychological propounds, the most important periods of his life and the most prominent characters which affected his thought and consequently affected his products including the concept of discourse and all its fields, and what that discourse contains as propounds characterized with epistemological authoritarian fact whether they were materialistic or psychological, then Finding approaches of Foucault's discourse in some works of a group of international directors reaching to the impact of this thought on a group of Iraqi dramatic shows and experiments. Therefore; the researcher divided the study into four chapters The first dealt with the methodological frame and the problem of the study embodied by the following question : How is the discourse of Michel Foucault represented in the Iraqi dramatic show ?The importance of the research is embedded in studying Foucault's philosophical discourse, as one of 20th century philosophers, and identify his thought and his product concerning discourse, the extent of the benefits that the Iraqi dramatic shows got from those theorizations. As for the need for the study; it is implied in providing advantages to students of Fine Arts colleges and Fine Arts institutions in devising the philosophical thoughts that are embedded in the dramatic show. The purpose of the study is represented in Identifying Michel Foucault discourse and its representations in the Iraqi dramatic shows.The Second chapter (the theoretical frame) included three sections; the first is concerned with the cultural philosophical conformation of Foucault's and his main writings, stages and transferences which he experienced during the period of his discourses theorizations, the most important philosophers, men of thoughts, men of literature, artists and the poets who affected his thought then his philosophical product and his own concept of discourse, then perusing the most important terms he worked on in his writings such as epistemology, Genealogy , archeology, panoptisme in addition to Marxism , structuralism reaching to College De France. In the Second section; the researcher shed light on Foucault's materialistic and psychological thoughts which are represented in various types of discourses to which he relates his propounds such as (the discourse of power, self - discourse, body - discourse, history discourse, epistemology discourse and madness discourse. These discourses took a critical way to show the relation between the total discourses on the one hand and power and epistemology on the other in order to find out the facts whether the matter is concerned with the materialistic visible image or with the invisible mental images. As for the third section; the researcher dealt with Foucault's discourse approaches in the dramatic show referring to some directors, such as(Arto , Erwin Pescator , Cantor , Jozef szajna , Peter Brook , Ariane Mnouchkine , Grotowski , Ojino Barba and Robert Wilson) as models whose products resulted in approaches on the theoretical and applying levels within the Foucault's discourse. Then the researcher talked about the indicators that are resulted from the theoretical frame to conform the tool by which the samples of the research were analyzed. Then the researcher ended the section with reviewing the previous studies. The Third chapter (the procedures of the study) which included the community of the study, that consists of sixty three plays. The researcher relied on the academic dramatic shows which were presented in the colleges of fine arts in Baghdad University, Babylon University and Mosul University from 2005 to 2010, from which the samples of the study were chosen. The samples of the study were analyzed by means of the tool of analysis, its validity, its stability and the approach of the research, choosing the intentional sample; then analyzing the sample that are represented in the following dramatic shows : 1. The Play "Mice and Presses"2. The Play "Either…Or"3. The Play "Ice"The Fourth chapter dealt with the findings which the researcher reached at : 1. The authoritarian discourse dominated the three shows; represented as a moral and materialistic authority as in "Ice", or the authority of power as in "Either…Or" and "Mice and Presses" in which the authorities varied between materialistic and psychological in the characters. 2. The three shows shed a light on the role of the marginalized person in the society and the loss of values which he suffered because of coercion and social injustice considering him, the neglected, as a (non - thought of) category.3. The shows of the two plays "Ice" and "Either… Or" presented the mechanisms of power sexuality and madness through disassembling their themes and relate them to epistemology. While "Mice and Presses" is built on the authoritarian conquer and presenting paste and senseless words to the minds of characters which misguided them in finding the truth.The chapter also included the conclusions and a group of recommendations and suggestions, followed by references and photos. The researcher ended the study with the English abstract.
