Show: 25 50 75 100 Results

Search results: 2 out of 2

الضرورة في الاجراءات الجزائية : دراسة مقارنة

Author name: مريم خليل ابراهيم جاسم
Supervisor name: محمد حميد عبد
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Principles of Criminal Trials
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:

سلطة القاضي الجزائي في قبول الدليل الالكتروني == the judge's authority in accepting the electronic evidence A comparative study

Author name: مروى عبد الواحد حسن
Supervisor name: بصائر علي محمد
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Principles of Criminal Trials
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:
Abstract: The evidence constitutes extreme significance in the field of penal proof as it is the means through which the crime can be detected and its attribution to its criminal with merging new techniques of felonies which are committed by electronic technologies that the traditional evidence may not be useful for such techniques beginning from being originated from electronic virtual media which requires evidence appropriate with such electronic technique and the virtual media from which it originates. Therefore, the judge's penal dealing with the e - evidence became necessity and sometimes vital; particularly, the modern criminality policy allowed to apply the state of art scientific advance requirements to show the fact. So, the judge is not bound with the legal facts but they have the right to have an access to everything leading to assist the judge to form any idea. Accordingly, we attempted to identify the extent of the judge's authority if accepting this evidence and whether such electronic evidence has the evidencing power and effectiveness in such a way to affect the judge's personal satisfaction for ordering their judgment.According to the trouble related with this issue, we divide this study into three chapters. Chapter one adopts the concept of the electronic evidence in three themes : the first one gives definition of the e - evidence and its characteristics and types. The second one shows the selfness through its distinction from the electronic document. The third theme considers the scope of the electronic evidence through studying the electronic felony as it is the electronic felony scene as well as the traditional one.It has been revealed to us that it has several characteristics which distinguish it from the traditional evidence so it needs to an expert to deal with. It is, also, clear that its role is not limited to prove the electronic felonies but it stretches to prove the traditional crimes.Chapter Two addresses the judge's authority in concluding the e - evidence; however, the evidence, in general, is a tool for attaining the fact which automatically appears and it requires to be extracted via lawfully restricted procedures. Since such procedures implies prejudice to the individuals' rights and freedoms. So, this Chapter includes three themes. The first one discusses the tangible procedures which are demonstrated in visual inspection. The second one considers theApersonal procedures where we consider the electronic testimony and then the electronic expertise as it has a role that might be decisive in such sort of evidence. We explain in the third theme how to extract the evidence by state of art technologies as they have key role in obtaining the electronic evidence and that is demonstrated partly in monitoring the electronic visual and audio communications and then the visual and audio monitoring on the persons.Chapter Three goes through the judge's authority in accepting the electronic evidence based on the concept of the judge's satisfaction and the limits of this principle. Then we explain the extent of the judge's satisfaction of the electronic evidence through showing the value of the electronic evidence and the extent of its effect on the judge's conscience in forming his/ her idea as the judge would have the freedom in assessment. Whatsoever the electronic evidence is credible, the e - evidence needs judicial sense which is realized only by the judge so the judge must have electronic technology knowledge so that he/ she can learn and how to deal with such situation.Through hereby study; we conclude that most penal legislations including Iraqi legislation do not explicitly stipulate the electronic evidence; however, it has been endeavored for accepting the electronic evidence before the judge and consider it just secondary link that shouls be supported abd backed by other proofs.