Author name:
خالد عبد الله محمد عامر
Supervisor name:
امين عباس نذير
Abstract:
The Message dealt with the subject (of coalition governments of Turkey) within a specified period (1961 - 1980) and what happened on the levels of development (economic, social and political) during the rule of the coalition governments of the developments in a positive or both negative.This letter was distributed to the four seasons, as well as the introduction and conclusion, highlighted in the first chapter (multi - party and its impact on domestic politics and the growing coalition trends in Turkey's path (1946 - 1960), as included this chapter : multi - party system and analyze the political dimension in Turkey and the policy of the Democratic party and the coalition formation introductions in Turkey (1950 - 1960).The second chapter : it ensures the formation of coalition governments in Turkey under the military Enterprise Manager (1961 - 1965), as this chapter includes three sections : The first talks about the Turkish parliamentary elections under the new Constitution (1961), while the second section : they occur all coalition governments of Turkey in terms of composition and political program within the period (1961 - 1965), and the third section : they arise from the Turkish regional and international for those governments foreign policy and the position of those governments from 1964 to the Cyprus issue, as well as Turkey's relationship with the common European market.The third chapter, which includes coalition governments of Turkey (1972 - 1980), which includes three sections : The first talks about the elections and the results of the path, and the second : talks about the structure of the coalition governments of Turkey (1972 - 1980), and is divided into three periods of judgment : the first included the coalition governments under the military enterprise Manager (1972 - 1973), while the second period Vtdment : coalition governments (1973 - 1977), then followed by the third period of coalition governments (1977 - 1980), and the third section of this chapter contains : coalition governments and processors economic and social situation in Turkey.The fourth chapter and the last of this message : coalition governments and Turkish Foreign Policy (1972 - 1980), which contains three sections : The first coalition governments ensure strategic foreign policy in terms of : achieving national security, economic development and achieve a balance in international relations to Turkey, and the second : Talking the vision of the Turkish coalition governments in dealing with the Cyprus problem and its impact on the Turkish - Greek relations, and the third talks about coalition governments and regional and international relations, including with the common European market countries.And finally came to the conclusion provides a summary of what reached the letter of the conclusions of the coalition governments of Turkey within a limited period (1961 - 1980).The letter also reached a number of conclusions, I will mention in the following lines : A democratic system is basically in the nature of governance, bringing economic and religious factor, they are the basis of the electoral propaganda among the political parties and platforms, so it appeared the so - called invitations to adopt a market economy and openness to the world and allow the flow of foreign capital, and therefore that policy has become an approach consistent political parties and governments that emerged from all those democratic practices, as laid ambitious plans to upgrade its goals in the Turkish economy dependent on policy and encourage sectors (agricultural - industrial - commercial).Turkey exposed to chronic economic problems as a result of errors of economic policy practiced by the Turkish government during the fifties of the last century, to materialize as a fact and realistic eluded coalition governments that received the reins of power in (the sixties and seventies) of the last century to develop solutions to them, marked by non - qualitative balance and quantitative between population size and natural resources, low labor productivity, scarcity of scientific and technological personnel that contribute to the manufacture, modernization and urbanization of society, high unemployment, rising prices and low wages, and the deterioration of investment rates, low per capita and the scarcity of economic resources income and the inability to invest rate Voshm it all the prevalence of cases of grumbling and dissatisfaction, in pushing political forces and movements to exploit the situation, came the phenomenon of political violence and assassinations as one of the most prominent results of that crisis.Was the issue of Cyprus great influence on Turkish policy towards Greece, as Turkey stood up to the Greek policy to include Cyprus in the framework of unity with them, and at a time when it seeks to bring the full island was Turkey accepted the idea of partition, it was reassuring somewhat on the future of the island taking advantage of the British position who was standing deduced from the position of Greece, and because of the perception both of them not being able to achieve its goals imbedded compelled to conduct negotiations led to the independence of Cyprus, however, the issue of Cyprus after independence was the main problem, in the framework of relations between Turkey and Greece, and reflected significantly on policy Turkish, and if we take into consideration international interests and the interests of the United States, which conflicted with the Turkish position, prompting the Turkish policy to escalate the situation with Greece and the occupation of the island in 1974.Those political parties that were able to engage in the political process to get the power, or at least a public office, what are the only parties express the personality and self - serving to strengthen the influence of its founders, and does not have any faith, and not only in Turkey, but it applies to the states, which claimed apply all the democratic system.Therefore, those parties that participated in the formation of coalition governments in Turkey was weak and unable to achieve its goals for the future of Turkey.
