Author name:
انتصار سامي ابراهيم
Supervisor name:
ضياء محمد محمود المشهداني
Abstract:
Has appeared to me by searching the following results : * The son of Hafez Hajar al - Astalahath its own in the book bring civility, such as "acceptable", "truthful matter" and other expressions of the other. * disagrees with some of the terms mentioned in the introduction to his book, "rounding" particularly unacceptable, and the unknown, and others. * use of some phrases are not clear significance, which requires consideration of the conditions of narrators who fired them, and explore the reports make to find out what they really are. * non - compliance with the methodology Altzmha in its terminology, in a number of translations of the book, it puts its terms is defined by, and contrary to its approach in some of the narrators, particularly with regard to the "acceptable" and conditions in it. * is located to Hafiz Ibn Hajar illusion and forget, he missed many things taken into consideration when judging the narrator had been mentioned in the discipline which is the origin of rounding or in Fath al - Bari was required for him to be more accurate to those who have been sentenced to Palmqpaulin and have a novel in the "correct" or one of them, especially that some of these and Thaghm in Fath al - Baari, as are the symbols that symbol of the narrators in this book. * notes in terms of being acceptable to him a little talk, and did not make the term in the few officers known to be relied upon to identify the few and the many. * notes that the terms of Hafiz Ibn Hajar achieved in more narrators, but they are not the people of this place, because the PSP including inaccurate, has taken into account when considering the conditions verify conditions in the acceptable, without considering the words of critics in some of them, and who go out to them. * observed in most of the narrators who described the word "unacceptable" a few reports from them not only tells about one or Raoyen Rao, which means entry of these two sections in the case of ambiguity, and this obscured Hafiz Askalani (may God have mercy on him), and was followed by nothing. * can be ascertained that the term "acceptable" is the term special Balhafez O Muslim view of its requirements which, though other leaders of this matter may use this word, they want him to accept the obligation of documentation, and often Bivunha to another word such as "chief" acceptable " Okay novel "acceptable" modern "and these words were removed by Hafiz in the balance much, but it does not mean by this place, but intended to authentication, and used it in the widely used special rounding. * The result of these studies because I accepted where there has been keeper of the conditions for acceptable in most of the narrators, and departed with regard to the fact their condition and sentenced according to the wound and controls the amendment. * Most of the narrators are admitted Almkulain to talk, it is not their only modern and modern, but Roya one is "Yahya bin Qzaap muezzin" Sheikh al - Bukhaari in his Saheeh, out of twenty - six recently. * fully several narrators of the men admitted to one thousand five hundred and thirty - five Roya distributed in different layers, and most of the narrators of the third layer, while the least understanding of the narrators of the second class years at the Ibn Hajar al. * found narrators admitted who said Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) that took out their sheikhs, they are not the narrators of the correct Vzkrthm I referred to this issue for more interest, and not to Istdrick that I overlooked this issue, Vtnolthm something from the shortcut because they are not the subject of my studies. * found more than a narrator and confident keeper'Asqallaani in "Fath" frankly should have been alert to this and make provision for them in sentencing the word "acceptable", which is the right thing in their situation, and they are seven narrators : Abdullah bin Abdul Rahman Al Tamimi Siddiqi, Omar bin Abdullah bin tab, brave polite ibn al - Walid, Yazid ibn Abi Kabshah Alskski, Abdullah ibn Umar ibn Ishaq many civil sire superfluous, and James the son of Asim bin tab. In conclusion, I recommend that researchers and seekers of knowledge workers in this field that, look at each part of the molecules of this art, I mean the art criticism of men and find out the correct morbid, this knowledge can not be addressed by anyone who wants, but his men, specialists, the results will be sharper and deeper, It is in judging the impact of the narrators, especially to correct the narrators of these books are of particular merit for Muslims, and because the appeal which is challenged in the Sunnah, which is the second source of Islamic legislation. I also invite researchers to pull up their sleeves and plunge in this science, without letting the gap come from before Islam and its people, especially the symbols of science who had just handed us this wealth and sustained her to us on a few numbers, how has evolved science and easy means of study and research, what the researcher However, the true faith, after depending on God, and keep away from everything that is ugly about scientific research intolerance and extremism, and all that would weaken the sober and solid scientific research, and the last prayer to thank God.
