Show: 25 50 75 100 Results

Search results: 9 out of 84

التفسير الغائي للنصوص الدستورية : دراسة مقارنة == Purposive interpretation of constitutional texts

Author name: رسول جمعة خلف علي
Supervisor name: حسين حبر حسين الشويلي
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Public Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:

القصد الخاص في جريمة ابادة الجنس البشري == Special intent in the crime of genocide

Author name: حسين علي خضير
Supervisor name: بصائر علي محمد
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Public Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:

جريمة الاتجار بالاطفال في القانون العراقي == The crime of trafficking in children in Iraqi law

Author name: كريم حمود فحل الجبوري
Supervisor name: بصائر علي محمد
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Public Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:

الدفع بالنظام العام في الدعوى المدنية

Author name: سلام حسين سعود
Supervisor name: علي حميد كاظم
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Private Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:

اليات الامتثال في تنفيذ الاتفاقيات البيئية متعددة الاطراف == Compliance Mechanisms in The Implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements

Author name: مهند عجب جنديل الدهامي
Supervisor name: صلاح عبد الرحمن الحديثي
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Public Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:

حدود اختصاص القضاء الدستوري == The Idea of self Restrictions in Judicial Review - A comparative Study -

Author name: احمد عبد السلام عبد الدائم
Supervisor name: حسين جبر حسين الشويلي
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Constitutional Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:
Abstract: تناول الباحث دراسة حدود اختصاص القضاء الدستوري ـــــ دراسة مقارنة ـــــ لكل من الولايات المتحدة الامريكية ومصر والعراق، لما لهذه الدراسة من اهمية بما تتضمنه من ضوابط تؤدي الى نجاح القضاء الدستوري وازدهاره، حيث يتقيد الاخير بهذه الضوابط عند مباشرة اختصاصه في الرقابة على دستورية القوانين، وذلك ضمانا لعدم احتكاكه بالسلطات العامة سواء السلطة التشريعية ام السلطة التنفيذية، ولمنع الدخول مع اي منها في معركة غير متكافئة، ومن اجل ان تبقى هذه الضمانة ضمن اطارها الفني القانوني دون الدخول في الملائمات التشريعية التي يختص بها المشرع، حيث ان دراسة حدود اختصاص القضاء الدستوري يعتمد اساسا على مبدا الفصل بين السلطات، والذي يقوم على اساس وجود السلطات العامة الثلاث التشريعية والتنفيذية والقضائية، والتي حدد الدستور لكل منها حدود اختصاصهوارسم لها طرق عملها، فلا يجوز لاي منها ان يتعدى هذه الحدود، والا اتسم عملها بعدم الدستورية. | The researcher addressed the study of the limits of the jurisdiction of the constitutional judiciary A comparative study of the United States of America, Egypt and Iraq, because of the importance of this study, which includes the controls that lead to the success and prosperity of the constitutional judiciary, where the latter adheres to constitutionality of these controls when the exercise of its competence in censorship The laws, so as to ensure that it does not engage with the public authorities, either the legislature or the executive branch, and to prevent entry with any of them in an unequal battle, and to keep this guarantee within their legal technical framework without entering into the legislative acts of the legislator, since The study of the jurisdictional limits of the constitutional jurisdiction depends mainly on the principle of the separation of powers, which is based on the existence of the three legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, each of which defines the limits of its jurisdiction and its methods of work, none of which may exceed these limits,or its functioning of unconstitutionality

سلطة القاضي الجزائي في قبول الدليل الالكتروني == the judge's authority in accepting the electronic evidence A comparative study

Author name: مروى عبد الواحد حسن
Supervisor name: بصائر علي محمد
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Principles of Criminal Trials
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:
Abstract: The evidence constitutes extreme significance in the field of penal proof as it is the means through which the crime can be detected and its attribution to its criminal with merging new techniques of felonies which are committed by electronic technologies that the traditional evidence may not be useful for such techniques beginning from being originated from electronic virtual media which requires evidence appropriate with such electronic technique and the virtual media from which it originates. Therefore, the judge's penal dealing with the e - evidence became necessity and sometimes vital; particularly, the modern criminality policy allowed to apply the state of art scientific advance requirements to show the fact. So, the judge is not bound with the legal facts but they have the right to have an access to everything leading to assist the judge to form any idea. Accordingly, we attempted to identify the extent of the judge's authority if accepting this evidence and whether such electronic evidence has the evidencing power and effectiveness in such a way to affect the judge's personal satisfaction for ordering their judgment.According to the trouble related with this issue, we divide this study into three chapters. Chapter one adopts the concept of the electronic evidence in three themes : the first one gives definition of the e - evidence and its characteristics and types. The second one shows the selfness through its distinction from the electronic document. The third theme considers the scope of the electronic evidence through studying the electronic felony as it is the electronic felony scene as well as the traditional one.It has been revealed to us that it has several characteristics which distinguish it from the traditional evidence so it needs to an expert to deal with. It is, also, clear that its role is not limited to prove the electronic felonies but it stretches to prove the traditional crimes.Chapter Two addresses the judge's authority in concluding the e - evidence; however, the evidence, in general, is a tool for attaining the fact which automatically appears and it requires to be extracted via lawfully restricted procedures. Since such procedures implies prejudice to the individuals' rights and freedoms. So, this Chapter includes three themes. The first one discusses the tangible procedures which are demonstrated in visual inspection. The second one considers theApersonal procedures where we consider the electronic testimony and then the electronic expertise as it has a role that might be decisive in such sort of evidence. We explain in the third theme how to extract the evidence by state of art technologies as they have key role in obtaining the electronic evidence and that is demonstrated partly in monitoring the electronic visual and audio communications and then the visual and audio monitoring on the persons.Chapter Three goes through the judge's authority in accepting the electronic evidence based on the concept of the judge's satisfaction and the limits of this principle. Then we explain the extent of the judge's satisfaction of the electronic evidence through showing the value of the electronic evidence and the extent of its effect on the judge's conscience in forming his/ her idea as the judge would have the freedom in assessment. Whatsoever the electronic evidence is credible, the e - evidence needs judicial sense which is realized only by the judge so the judge must have electronic technology knowledge so that he/ she can learn and how to deal with such situation.Through hereby study; we conclude that most penal legislations including Iraqi legislation do not explicitly stipulate the electronic evidence; however, it has been endeavored for accepting the electronic evidence before the judge and consider it just secondary link that shouls be supported abd backed by other proofs.

الرقابة القضائية على تقدير العقوبة الانضباطية : دراسة مقارنة == The Judicial control over the assessment of disciplinary punishment A comparative study

Author name: اسد موفق جلاب
Supervisor name: نجيب خلف احمد الجبوري
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Administrative Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:
Abstract: تعد سلطة تقدير العقوبة الانضباطية احدى السلطات التي تباشرها الادارة في مجال الوظيفة العامة ، وهي تعني منح الادارة حرية في اختيار العقوبة التي تتناسب مع المخالفة المرتكبة من الموظف نتيجة اخلاله بواجباته الوظيفية ، وتختلف السلطات الانضباطية التي تتولى توقيع العقوبة في الدول المقارنة حسب النظام الوظيفي لكل دولة ، فمنها من اخذ بالنظام الرئاسي ومن اخذ بالنظام القضائي ، وان منح الادارة حرية التقدير للعقوبة يستند الى تخويل المشرع لهذه السلطة على وفق رؤيته بان الادارة هي الاقدر على ممارسة هذه السلطة في مواجهة ظروف العمل الاداري ومستجداته ، وكذلك هي الاقدر على تحديد الاخطاء التي تشكل مخالفة في مجال الوظيفة العامة ، وفي مقابل منح الادارة سلطة التقدير للعقوبة فان المشرع احاطها بضمانات لا بد من مراعاتها عند ممارستها لسلطة التقدير ، منها مراعاة مبدا شرعية العقوبة ، حيث ان المشرع اورد العقوبات على سبيل الحصر ويجب ان تكون العقوبة الموقعة من ضمن العقوبات التي حددها المشرع ، وكذلك لا بد من مراعاتها لمبدا التناسب الذي بموجبه يقتضي ضرورة توقيع عقوبة تتناسب مع المخالفة المرتكبة ، وياتي دور القضاء الاداري لاستكمال دور المشرع في ضرورة تحقيق هذه الضمانات من خلال رقابته على الوجود المادي للواقعة ومراقبته للتكييف القانوني من خلال صحة الوصف القانوني للواقعة وكذلك مراقبته اهمية الواقعة ، فاذا ما خرجت سلطة الادارة عن مسارها الذي وضعه المشرع لها فان القضاء يواجهها من خلال السلطات التي يمتلكها ، فيعمل على الغاء العقوبة اذواقعت على الموظف وكانت مشوبة بعيب من عيوب القرار الاداري التي تجعله محلا للالغاء ، او يخفض العقوبة اذا كانت لا تتناسب مع حجم المخالفة ، او يصادق على العقوبة او يحكم بالتعويض ان كان له مقتضى . | The discretionary punitive authority is one of the powers exercised by the public administration in the public service. It grants the administration the freedom to choose the right penalty that suit the violation committed by the employee as a result of breach his or her duties, the disciplinary authorities that impose sanctions in other comparative countries are differ according to the government employment system of each country. Some of them use the presidential system and other countries uses the judicial system. Granting the power of discretion authority to the administration by the legislator is based on an authorization by the legislator to the administration according to his vision that the administration will do its best to serve the public interest and it will be able to exercise this authority in the best interest of the institution. The administration is also knows how to find and deduct its mistakes when they happen based on their discretionary power, including the principle of the legality of the sentence, since the legislator listed the penalties exclusively, also the penalty imposed shall be one of the penalties specified by the legislator, and the proportionality principle must be taken into consideration. It is necessary to impose a penalty that suit the violation. The judiciary role of the administrative is to complete the legislator's role in the necessity of achieving these guarantees, And monitoring the legal adaptation through the validity of the legal description of the incident as well as its role of controlling the important incidents. If the administrative authority departs from the path that has been set by the legislator, the judiciary faces it by its authorities. The administrative court can abolish the penalty if it does not suit the violation committed by the employee, endorses the penalty or award compensation to one of the parties if needed.

الدور الرقابي لمكتب المفتش العام في العراق

Author name: شعيب صفاء الدين شاكر
Supervisor name: عيسى تركي خلف الجبوري
General topic: Law
Specific topic: Constitutional Law
Degree: Master
University: Aliraqia University - Faculty Of Law And Political Science - Department Of Public Law
Language: Arabic
University location: Baghdad
First pages:
Abstract: يعد مكتب المفتش العام في العراق مظهرا جديدا من مظاهر رقابة الادارة على نفسها فقد استحدث بموجب الامر (57) لسنة 2004 والصادر عن سلطة الائتلاف ( المؤقتة المنحلة ) ليكون عين السلطة التنفيذية وذراعها في تصحيح اعمال الوزارات , الا ان ارادة المشرع قد ذهبت الى ان يكون هذا الجهاز هو جهاز يجمع بين الرقابة الادارية الخارجية والرقابة الادارية الداخلية , من حيث منحه بعض الاستقلال المالي والاداري تجاه الادارة في ممارسة اعماله مع منحه مهام وسلطات تظهر فيها الادارة بمظهر الخاضع له وذلك بشمولية رقابته عليها , بالاضافة الى اسناده للبرلمان في ممارسة دوره الرقابي الذي منحه اياه الدستور على اعمال السلطة التنفيذية . وبالمقابل نجد ان مكتب المفتش العام مرتبط بالادارة تنظيميا فهو احد التشكيلات التي تتكون منها الوزارة حيث يعد اعلى جهة رقابية متخصصة تابعة لها , ويتبين من ذلك ان مكتب المفتش العام بسماته هذه يعد جهازا رقابيا اداريا يدعم الرقابة السياسية فعن طريق رفع تقاريره الى البرلمان يستطيع تحريك المسؤولية السياسية ضد الوزير المخالف , وكذلك يستطيع رفع شان الوزارة لان ما يقدمه من تقارير الى الجهات المعنية لا تتضمن فقط الجانب السلبي من نشاط الوزارة بل يتضمن الايجابيات والسلبيات لعمل الوزارات ايضا . ويسعى مكتب المفتش العام من خلال ممارسة رقابته الى تحقيق اهداف معينة يمكن ان نجعلها الغاية التي دفعت المشرع لتاسيس هكذراقابة الواهي مكافحة الفساد الاداري والوقاية منه , فضلا عن اصلاح المنظومة الادارية في الدولة , ولتحقيق هذه الاهداف يمارس جملة من المهام الوقائية والعلاجية وذلك بتطبيق مختلف انواع الرقابة , والتي نجد لها اثارا في جانب القانون الاداري وكذلك الجنائي . ولكي يسلط الباحث الضوء على الدور الرقابي الذي يقوم به مكتب المفتش العام في العراق فقد تم تقسيم البحث على ثلاثة فصول تناول في الفصل الاول منه مفهوم المفتش العام , اما الفصل الثاني فقد تناول تنظيم الرقابة التي يمارسها مكتب المفتش العام , اما الفصل الثالث والاخير فقد خصص لبيان المهام الرقابية لمكتب المفتش العام والنتائج التي تفرزها هذه الرقابة على القوانين الاخرى | The Office of the Inspector - General in Iraq is a new manifestation of the administration's surveillance of itself. It was created under CPA Order 57 of 2004 to appoint the executive branch and its arm to correct the actions of the ministries. but, the legislator's will has tended to be This system combines administrative external control and internal administrative control, in terms of granting him some financial and administrative independence towards the administration in the exercise of his work, as well as the functions and powers in which the administration appear in appearance of the yield and the Comprehensive control of it, In addition to his support for parliament in In the practice of its oversight role, who grant by the Constitution on the actions of the executive branch.On the other hand, the Office of the Inspector - General is linked to the organizational administration, which is one of the formations that comprise the ministry and its supreme Specialized control . The Office of the Inspector - General in this capacity is an administrative supervisory body of a political nature, by submitting his reports to Parliament and making them available to the media and the public, he can move political responsibility against the offending minister .The Office of the Inspector - General seeks through the exercise of its control to achieve certain objectives that can be considered as the purpose that prompted the legislator to establish such control, namely ,anti - administrative corruption and prevention, As well as the reform of the dilapidated administrative system in the State. In order to achieve these objectives, the Office exercises several preventive and therapeutic tasks by applying various types of censorship, Whose results we seek in terms of administrative, and criminal law.To clarify the oversight role of the Iraq Inspector General's Office, the research was divided into three chapters. In chapter I, we discussed the concept of Inspector General. Chapter II deals with oversight organization in the Office of the Inspector - General, The third and final chapter is devoted to the Control functions of the Office of the Inspector - General and the results it reflect in other laws .
1 2