البحث — المستودع الرقمي العراقي

المستخلص: The rules of criminal law have been found as to protect the rights and benefits as needed by any society and the violation of such rights considered the violation of the society security and its stability. This could be done through the rules of criminalization and punishment that could specifies the project through banned behaviors that should be taken into consideration by the society. This could be known as a tasking within these rules and specifying the part that should be applied against the person who violates that behavior. This part is considered as an essential element by which the rules are completed . The state should not apply such element , even though he acknowledges the crime , it ( the state ) should do that through the lawsuit that could be determined by the specialized authority until the issuance of a judgment and that is organized by the penalties procedural rules through which it could search for the availability of terms of such tasking in rules of criminalization and punishment and to show to what extent it could apply the penalty . It is the means by which the rules are to be applied . The rules of law and punishment remain still without the interference of the penalties procedural rules , its goal is to get to the truth for the state 's requirements in the punishment without violating the rights of individuals and their freedoms . It aims to fulfill the balance between the two oppositions, the first one is for the benefit of the society to know the reality and to punish the one who violates the security by committing the crime and the other one is for the benefit of the individuals in their freedoms . This could be carried out by specifying guarantees imposed on the state ; If the punishment be applied on an innocent person , then the effect will be larger on the society than the felon person . The violation of the penalties procedural rules is considered as a violation for the principle of the procedural rules.The law includes rules of penalty procedural bases , these rules are of different types, some of them are specified by the boards and devicesBundertaking the practicing of activities that control the crimes and the devices practicing the activities undertake the formation of these boards and to determine its specializations, this could be called as " Judicial organization" . Of these rules , are means that control the work of the boards and having the authority to take procedures and to show the main elements as to take permitted procedures, taking into consideration the search for the criminals and to collect evidences to investigate with the accused. This could be known as strict penalty procedural rules.As a result of the strict penalty procedural rules included by the law of penalty trials rules , the rules have been known in the light of its goals and they are considered as rules that place sufficient procedures to uncover the reality , to fulfill the criminal justice and to determine the judicial bodies specializing into applying these rules .The procedural rules are to organize the means of the social reaction before the crime and its committers through a set of procedures carried out by the specialized bodies . The rules are to follow up the crime committing and continuing until the issuance of judgment for that. Despite that, the criminal procedures start before the crime take place and they ( procedures) are surrounded with legal guarantees owing to the discovery of crime evidences and to place the person under accusation and permitted to take investigation procedures to confront him ( the accused).Thus , this subject has been taken into consideration for uncovering the philosophical bases of penalty procedural bases and to indicate its rules for securing these different benefits. This could be one by shedding the light on the procedural legal texts concerning with this subject and to indicate to the weak and strong points , then to explain things that impede these texts , entailing the Iraqi judiciary stance and jurisprudence opinions over unsettled matters with scientific legal method within the law of Iraqi penalty trails rules , No. 23 for the year 1971 and comparative procedural laws.Despite of what has been written about the penalty procedural rules , but they ( the rules ) have not sufficiently taken into consideration by the jurisprudence , legislation and judiciary in Iraq. .CFor these reasons, I have found myself to be motivated to write about this subject and I wish that this study will brings benefit to all.By analyzing the texts of penalty trails rules law , we have found that there are many defects in the procedural rules , thus it is necessitated to analyze the procedural rules and its bases and it should address the defects through indicating to the bases that should be taken into consideration within these rules .In our research , we focus on the general philosophical bases of penalty procedural rules and to know the total rules without discussing in details its subject matter , its procedural rules . In have depended on the comparative method for explaining the legal connection with the procedural rules. This could be carried out by comparing of what has been mentioned in the laws and jurisprudent writings , along with the stance of Iraqi judiciary from that ,as to indicate to the weak and strong points in the law of Iraqi penalty procedural rules , using analytical method in the legal texts and judiciary decisions.I have found that to get all sides of this subject , it should divide this research into two researches , the first one is about the penalty procedural rules that includes two chapters , the first one carries the title ( what is the penalty procedural rules ? and the second chapter will be under the title " The analysis of penalty procedural rules", while the second research comes with the title " The legal construction of penalty procedural base" that includes two chapters , the first one is under the title " The reverent benefit in the penalty procedural base, while the second chapter is about " the legal formation for the penalty procedural Rule"

نظرية العلم بالتجريم

اسم المؤلف: عقيل عزيز عودة

اسم المشرف: جمال ابراهيم عبد الحسين الحيدري

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2007

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الجنائي

الدرجة: دكتوراه

الجامعة: جامعة بغداد - كلية القانون

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: بغداد

الصفحات الاولى:

الجرائم الماسة بحرية التعبير عن الفكر

اسم المؤلف: نوال طارق ابراهيم العبيدي

اسم المشرف: جمال ابراهيم عبد الحسين الحيدري

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2007

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الجنائي

الدرجة: دكتوراه

الجامعة: جامعة بغداد - كلية القانون

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: بغداد

الصفحات الاولى:

دور الارادة في المسؤولية الجزائية == The Role of Will In Penal Resposibility

اسم المؤلف: معاذ جاسم محمد العسافي

اسم المشرف: جمال ابراهيم عبد الحسين الحيدري

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2007

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الجنائي

الدرجة: دكتوراه

الجامعة: جامعة بغداد - كلية القانون

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: بغداد

الصفحات الاولى:

جريمة استعمال المحرارت المزورة في قانون العقوبات == The Crime of Using Forged Documents In The Penal Code

اسم المؤلف: دريد قحطان محمد القره داغي

اسم المشرف: عبد الستار سالم الكبيسي

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2007

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الجنائي

الدرجة: ماجستير

الجامعة: جامعة بغداد - كلية القانون

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: بغداد

الصفحات الاولى: