البحث — المستودع الرقمي العراقي

نتائج البحث: 4 من أصل 4

الحقوق السياسية للمراة : دراسة مقارنة == The Political Rights of Women

اسم المؤلف: رنا عصام عائد

اسم المشرف: حميد حنون خالد الساعدي

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2006

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الدستوري

الدرجة: ماجستير

الجامعة: جامعة الموصل - كلية الحقوق - قسم القانون العام

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: الموصل

الصفحات الاولى:

اعمال الدولة في ظل الاحتلال : دراسة في القانون الدولي == Acts Of State Under Occupation : AStudy in International Law

اسم المؤلف: خلف رمضان محمد بلال الجبوري

اسم المشرف: عامر عبد الفتاح الجومرد

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2006

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الدولي العام

الدرجة: دكتوراه

الجامعة: جامعة الموصل - كلية الحقوق - قسم القانون العام

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: الموصل

الصفحات الاولى:

نظرية المصلحة في الطعن الجنائي : دراسة مقارنة == The Theory Of Interest In The Criminal Challenge Comparison Study

اسم المؤلف: محمد عباس حمودي حسين الزبيدي

اسم المشرف: حسن عودة زعال حبيب الغانمي | عباس زبون عبيد العبودي

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2006

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الجنائي

الدرجة: دكتوراه

الجامعة: جامعة الموصل - كلية الحقوق - قسم القانون العام

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: الموصل

الصفحات الاولى:

المستخلص: لاريب ان اهمية المصلحة في الطعن الجنائي بوصفها مصلحة قانونية تمثل هدفا ساميا، جعلها تستحوذ على جانب كبير من عمل المشرع والفقيه، كما انها تمثل محورا تدور حوله اجراءات واسباب الطعن لكل من تظلم من قرار او حكم صدر ضد مصلحته او لم يستجب لطلباته على اقل تقدي | Undoubtedly, the importance of interest in criminal challenge, as a legal interest that represents a lofty aim, occupies a great aspect of legislator or jurist job. Also, it represents pivot of challenge procedures and reasons for anyone who complained of a decision or judgment pronounced against his interest or his demands have not been responded at least. On the other hand, the importance of interest in challenge becomes obvious when it relates to reasons of challenge that belong to a law mistake or procedures invalidity. This makes it relevant to both sections of criminal law. The Iraqi criminal legislator disregarded organizing and manifesting judgments that deal with interest in the criminal challenge, as well as he disregarded organizing a general theory for invalidity in the law of penal courts origins. In order to shed light on essence of interest in the criminal challenge and to determine its historical, legal, international and constitutional basis. In order to shed light on the role of legislation and criminal judiciary to incarnate the interest as an important principle in criminal challenge in legislations and legal applications compared in this study, Therfore the plan study responded to all this date & formation form tow parts. The First is : essence & base of interest in the criminal challenge. The second is : The legislative role of the interest in the criminal challenge theory & it's judicial applications. Part one collapse Tow Chapters, Chapter one deals with the essence of interest in the criminal challenge, concept and principles. Also deals with it's definition, it's conceptions, the basis of interest in criminal challenge, it's limiting, distinction between it & other similar subject. Whereas Chapter two deals with the basic of interest in the criminal challenge in ancient western &eastern legislations, Islamic law, international law and constitutions. Part Tow also contain tow chapters, in the first chapter we study the legislative role of interest in the criminal challenge in the field of substantive and procedural clauses throw the legislative policy of legislator the effect of criminal description of crime to the interest in the criminal challenge. In chapter Tow, the researcher reviewed the judicial applications in Iraq the judicial system of, France, Egypt, Syria, Jordan & Libya according to the comparative study. Finally There are many conclusions of this study which may explain the role & important of the interest in criminal challenge , there are many recommendations contain many suggestions adaptation some of article of Iraqi law of penal courts origins which have a relationship with the interest in the criminal challenge

حلف شمال الاطلسي وحفظ السلم والامن الدوليين : دراسة قانونية == Nato And Maintain International Peace And Security Legal Study

اسم المؤلف: عمر عبد الحميد عمر النعيمي

اسم المشرف: عامر عبد الفتاح الجومرد

الموضوع العام: القانون

السنة: 2006

الموضوع الدقيق: القانون الدولي العام

الدرجة: دكتوراه

الجامعة: جامعة الموصل - كلية الحقوق - قسم القانون العام

اللغة: العربية

مكان الجامعة: الموصل

الصفحات الاولى:

المستخلص: يعد حلف شمال الاطلسي من اهم الاحلاف العسكرية في القرن المنصرم وابرزها، لاسباب عدة منها على سبيل المثال وليس الحصر، دوره في فرض الامن في منطقة ستراتجية مهمة الا وهي شمال الاطلسي، ولانه يضم اكثر دول العالم تقدما تقنيا وتكنولوجيا، فضلا عن ذلك فان لديه ا | NATO is considered one of the most important and international military pacts which had been established doing the last century, and this due to several certain reasons. for example the main target of this organization is to impose security over an important and strategic area. Further more, this organization has many legalistic and military capacities. Hence, after the collapse of Warship pacts and the break up of it involved in security conflicts which means uncovering of eastern front of the pact towards various and serious risks either ethnic or religious and this due to the weakness of the economic structure of the republic and most of then don't applied the concepts of democracy. In addition to that most of these republic have weapon of mass destruction.NATO became an aimless one, as we knew each pact has a specific aim i.e. a specified enemy. especially after the collapse of both warsho pact and Soviet Union, NATO became an aimless organization, so it stroly searched for a certain issue which would be appropriable with its role and fifth expectations for the next period. consequently. for these above mentioned reasons and for other unknown one the organization put a certain basic aim for it which is the expansion towards the east so as to join many measure and bilateral treaties. Expansion here doesn't contain the membership of those states only but it included the military from work which is due to the widening of geographical field of the pact. Therefore this also contained the targets and the tasks of this pact, which is the most important point, NATO has determined the scope of its geographical action in the north Atlantic are in accordance with its charter so as to maintain international peace and security throughout this area. Consequently, after its expansion throughout its specific aims and tasks the area of the Northern Atlantic become as a conventional one of the pact. Further more another extents were determined so as to enable the pact to take effective measures and give attention to its basic issues, which first of them is to face the threatens of the security of its area and the main economic interest. Therefore the pact under various stipulations can intervene even far from the extents of its traditional action. In addition to that, there is a explicit legal contradiction within the situation as a wrole, hence, the pact has been able to play a semi - inter nation role in the concerning its relationship with the UN, as we know that the NATO has adopted all the purpose and the special principles provided in the UN charter and it make them as legal rules which can help it to do its tasks. It is worth mentioning, the charter of the pact don't contain any legal measure which may be used to deal with the oranges of the UN especially, with the security council, its main aim is to maintain international peace and security.Security council should be in formed about any actions that the pact may take in the case of collective defense. Then, the problem here is that the legislator of the pact didn't discuss the relationship between the pact and the security council, this means there is deliberate ambiguity by the pact legislators in order to make the above mention relationship an unclear and observe one, so as to give the pact more freedom to do its military operations. After the expansion of the pact, this operation resulted some effects which nay affair the previous explanation. So these effects didn't explain for with what international organ it was? But the operation was mentioned in Washington and Rome conferences so as to attach the NATO to the UN. Generally speaking, and without determine which is the organ that the pact is connected? and the legal problem which is resulted after the expansion of the pact is the capability of the pact to intervene in although, there is an arrived attack, and this what actually happened in (Yugoslavia) and the security Council decided that there was threatens to international peace and security, but there is no aggression or an armed attack event may be considered an explicit contradiction with what Article 61 of the UN Charter provides Moreover the above mentioned Article is the main base for the pact to do its actions. A/v these justification and another criticism for the expansion operation i.e. the criticisms of pecistimitics, the socialists or the expansion operation made these criticisms the legality of NATO more weakened. As we knew there is no contradiction between the military pacts and the UN charter although that the league has some stipulations. It's worth mentioning, the important topic about the NATO is the nature of its actions. Practically, there was a lawful problem that at the time, of Warsho pact and the Sovit Union, this pact must be a member in the security council. add to that the charter of NATO encourage the operation of armaments but it mentioned it tacitly, and it expressed its expansion its tasks limited with the question of the legality of the pact more and more, from the other hand its wide intervenes and many actions which may make the UN as the legal rule for its actions, the pact sometimes stand against the UN or may compete with it. In spite of what above mentioned NATO has been achieved a kind of stability in its traditional area, actually NATO can face any probable dangers and this is considered as an essential aim that most of the military pacts aim to attain it.