اسم المؤلف:
رقية ناصر سعيد
اسم المشرف:
باسل محمد محيي الدين
المستخلص:
This study of morphological system of Imam Jamal Aldeen Abu - Abdullah Muhammed Bin Malik (672AH) known as (Lamiya't Al - Af'aal - ) where he discussed a number of researches related to conjugation, sources and derivatives. Scholars took it upon themselves to elaborate it, hence they went through it in details, such as : BadirAldeenMuhammed Bin Muhammed Bin Abdullah, known as "Ibn Al - Nadhem" (686AH) in his paper (SharihLamiya't AL - Af'aal - ), and Muhammed Bin Yehya Al - Bujai' (744AH)his his paper (SharihLamiya't AL - Af'aal - ) and Buhroq Al - Yamani (930AH) in his paper (Fatih AL - Akfalwa Hal Al - Eshkal Be SharihLamiya't Al - Af'aal AL - MashoorBel - Sharh Al - Kabeer - ). My study talks about a single aspect of these elaborations : The Balance, which I entitled it as (Morphological research of elaborating (Lamiya't Al - Af'aal - ) of Ibn Al - Nadhem (686AH), Al - Bujai' (744AH), and Buhrq Al - Yamani (930AH); a study of balance). By looking at the title, you can tell that my paper aims at balancing the three scholars. The reason for choosing these scholars instead of others is due to their paper's significance and containing a vast morphological material in comparison to other papers, not mentioning its volume and details.After reviewing the elaborations and collecting morphological material, the topic is concluded in form of three elaborations/chapters and a conclusion; preceded by an introduction. The first chapter revolves around studying morphological curriculum of the scholars, in form of three sections : First, I explained the introductions of the three scholars and their methods in presenting their material; second, I explained the sources/references of morphological study; and third, I went through the scholars' point of view of formation, which consist of four demands : First, I explained 'hearing'; second, I explained 'measurement'; third, I explained causative morphology, and fourth, talks about consensus.Second chapter talks about morphological denotation of the scholars, which consist of three chapters : First, I went through the abstract and concrete morphological verbs structure; second, I elaborated on the abstract nouns structure; third, I explained the concrete nouns morphology. In this chapter, I started with morphological denotation prior to the study of nouns. That's due to Ibn Malik had explained his system starting with verbs before nouns.In chapter three I elaborated on the scholar's scientific personality, which is divided into three sections : First section talks about studying their response to Ibn Malik; the second section talks about studying their opinion of morphological disputation matters; and third one talks about studying their influence over scholars who came after them.I followed that with a conclusion which contains most significant results of this paper, among that : Ibn Malik system is considered as an educational system of Morphology, where he included matters connected to conjugation, derivation and sources as a primary method in studying morphology. Also, other elaborators followed in Ibn Malik's steps in sorting subjects in Lamiya't Al - Af'aal and didn't go off - topic in explaining it. In Al - Bujai' and Buhroq's elaborations you can find extra details and explanations in describing IbnNadhem's paper who strictly elaborated on his father's and didn't add much more. The conclusions of such elaborations of AL - Bujai' and Buhroq are seen in the form of additional examples of different types except of the Quranic one where Buhroq clearly exceeded at. We also cannot find a clear statement of the elaborators of affiliation to the two schools (Basra &Kuffa), Indeed, on some occasion, the Kuffa's school is favored by most opinions and responses being contrastive by those studying them. Scholars used a variety of sources in form of media and books, the scholars chose their morphological material among many of Arabic scholars who preceded them or their books. Ibn Malik's Lamyia't Al - Af'aal was characterized by lack of explanation which resulted in criticism; which in turn varied depending on the number of scholars. You can see it in more details in Buhroq explanation - taking into account he came after both of IbnNadhem and Al - Bujai'. Throughout my study of scholars influence of those who followed after, I came to realize that IbnNadhem was more fortunate than Buhroq and Al - Bujai', that is due to his explanation on AL - Lamiya' despite his small - figured body, and most of other scholars of the same system took it as a bases for their explanation. Al - Bujai' wasn't so lucky, as not many have taken his work as a base for theirs. Buhroq came after the two mentioned above, and some writings was done taking his work as a bases considering his time back then.
