Share
الاجماع وخرقه في الدرس النحوي == The breaking Grammatial Consensus
Author name:
علاء حسين خضير ظاهر المنصوري
Supervisor name:
صباح عطيوي عبود الزبيدي
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Babylon - College Of Education For Human Sciences - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Babylon
First pages:
01T4907 - p.pdf
Abstract:
Out of the grammarians' sayings , it has become clear that the consensus is an argument , which is the same as the consensus in other scientific realm , such as the jurisprudence or the foundationalists or in any other science of the Islamic civilization . It is secondary in relation to the origins of grammatology ; and the one who breaks it is to be considered definitely erroneous and , consequently , his saying is not to be relied on . The researcher has seen that most of the grammarians' sayings which have been disseminated throughout their books suggesting a consensus on certain grammatical judgements , were not far away from the break done by more than one grammarian ; therefore , it is often too hard to claim a consensus on certain grammatical judgements , as they occur in the realm of Al - Mo'rabat or in that of Al - Mebniyat , which approximately represent the whole Arabic grammarian , because there is no doubt , after closely looking into the grammarians ' classifieds, you find someone who has broken this or that consensus. It has become evident that most of those who had broken the consensus , hadn't done so without relying on an evidence but they relied on arguments quoted from poetry or prose they had heard from the Arabs , or on the basis of certain texts taken from the Qur'an or the prophet's sayings , or from the Semitic languages or by measuring in accordance to some other grammatical judgement , to enhance a breaker's doctrine within whose frame the breaking has taken place . In some other cases , a breaker relies on the speaker's intention , or on his own linguistic knowledge and independent opinions , in addition to his own craft as a grammarian . Some grammarians announce the consensus breaker's . But in some other cases , they don't mention his name , making us look for the name in their grammatical books . Some of them may mention the title of the book where the grammarian has broken the consensus , but when we turn to it , we don't find the place where the breaking has occurred , instead we find it in another book of the same author . The grammatical consensus had been broken by the heads of Al - Basriya school and Al - Kufiya school as well ; and by some other ancient grammarians . It has been broken , too , by modernist grammarian figures , as it is affirmed in most issues treated by this thesis
