Share
النظام القانوني لانقضاء الدعوى الادارية من دون الحكم بالموضوع : دراسة مقارنة == The Legal system for the Lapse of the administrative case Without judging the subject case Comparative Study
Author name:
محمود عبد علي حميد الزبيدي
Supervisor name:
اسماعيل صعصاع غيدان البديري | هادي حسين عبد علي الكعبي
General topic:
Law
Specific topic:
Administrative Law
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Babylon - Faculty Of Law - Department Of Public Law
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Babylon
First pages:
13T1676 - p.pdf
Abstract:
هناك فكرة اساسية مبنية على التمييز بين فكرة الدعوى القضائية والخصومة القضائية من جهة وبين الدعوى القضائية وموضعها من جهة اخرى ، فالدعوى القضائية وان كانت تتمثل في حق يمنح للفرد مكنة الالتجاء الى القضاء بقصد الحصول على حكم في موضوع النزاع ، فان الخصومة تتمثل في مجموعة الاجراءات التي اتخذت في تلك الدعوى اثناء مباشرتها ، اذ يبدو هذا التمييز في انقضاء الخصومة قد لايترتب عليه انقضاء مكنة الدعوى القضائية ، اي انه قد تنقضي الخصومة لاحد اسباب انقضائها ، والتي يجمعها السقوط او البطلان ، ومع ذلك يظل حق الدعوى قائما يستطيع صاحبها ان يقيمها مرة اخرى متى كان مدة اقامتها لايزال مفتوحا ويتم التمييز بين الدعوى كوسيلة لحماية الحقوق والمراكز القانونية او اقرارها حين يعتدى عليها ، وبين موضوعها وهو الحق اوالمركز القانوني المطلوب حمايته او اقراره ، لان كلاهما ، حقيقه قانونية متميزة عن الاخرى ، اذ يستتبع ذلك ان انقضاء الدعوى لايستلزم حتما الحكم في موضوع الدعوى . فوجود الحق اوالمركز القانوني ليست سوى مسالة موضوع لايتعرض له القاضي ، بالحكم فيه الا بعد ان يفرغ من بحث مسائل تتعلق بالدعوى ذاتها ، كالاختصاص بنظرها وقبولها، وتاسيسا على ذلك، تعد الدعوى وهي سلطة الالتجاء الى القضاء ، شيئا متميزا عن المطالبة القضائية وعن باقي اجراءات الخصومة القضائية . واذا كان الدفع بمعناه العام يمثل جميع وسائل الدفاع التي يجوز للخصم ان يستعين بها فقد يتمثل بالدفع بعدم الاختصاص ، ام قد تتوجه هذه الوسائل الى انكار سلطة الخصم في استعمال الدعوى فقد يتوجه الى شرط من الشروط العامة يجب ان تتوافر لقبول الدعوى ، ومن ثم فان الحكم بعدم اختصاص المحكمة بنظرالدعوى والحكم بعدم قبوم الدعوى لايترتب عليها انقضاء الحق في الدعوى فيمكن لصاحب الحق اقامة الدعوى مرة اخرى امام المحكة المختصة . واذا كانت مدة اقامة الدعوى الادارية يتمثل في الاجل الذي يحدده القانون لاقامة دعوى الالغاء خلاله ، اذ يترتب على انقضاء هذا الاجل انقضاء الحق في اقامة الدعوى لان مدة الطعن بالالغاء تتميزبقصرها مقارنة مع المدد المحددة للطعن بالدعاوى الادارية الاخرى ، ومن ثم فهي مدة سقوط وليس مدة تقادم لان فوات مدة الطعن يؤدي الى سقوط حقه بالطعن وترد الدعوى الادارية لاقامتها بعد انقضاء مدة الطعن ، وقد ينقضي الحق في اقامة الدعوى لسبق الحكم بموضوعها والذي يدفع به في دعوى قائمة ، بقصد انكاراحقية المدعي في اقامة دعواه ، لسبق الحكم فيها ، قاصدا في ذلك منع المحكمة عن نظرالدعوى متمسكا في ذلك بمبدا حجية الشئ المحكوم فيه ، قد تكون حجية مطلق على الكافة اوحجية نسبيه بين اطراف الدعوى ، وقد تنقضي الدعوى الادارية من دون الحكم في موضوعها بالتنازل والترك والصلح وان هذه الاسباب يجمعها قاسم مشترك يتمثل بالتنازل . | The talk of trials jurisprudence is base on the basic thought of distinguishing between the idea of the legal case and the legal procedures from the one side and between the legal case and its subject from the other, where the legal case and despite it is represent in a right that gives the individual the chance to seek courts in the intention of getting judgment in the subject of the conflict, the procedures are represented in the group of the steps which were taken in that case during its intiating, where this distinguishing in the lapse of the procedures may not necessitate the lapse of the possibility of the legal case, i.e. the procedures may lapse for their lapsing causes, which are non suit or nullity, and the right of raising lawsuit is still there where the plaintiff can make the case again as the time is not expired. In addition to the previous distinguishing, between the case and the procedures, there is in the range of the suit case there is a distinguishing between the case as mean to protect the right of the legal posts or their affirmation when they are violated, and between its subject which is the right or the legal post to be protected or affirming it, as they are described as two distinguished legal facts, and that lead to that the lapse of the case does not necessitate the judging in the subject of the case. Where the existence of the right or the legal post are not but subject issue that the judge does not make decision in it until the finish of searching in the issues related to the case itself, like specialty and acceptance, where the prevailed definition of the case in jurisprudence and in judging represent the authority or the possibility of seeking judgment, by which the individuals can seek judgment to protect their violated right or for affirming these rights or make compensations for harms.And this possibility can not be maxed with the judicial demand which is the actual seeking for judgment, where we must differentiate between the authority of doing some action, and between the actions done in use of this authority. Basing on this logical distinguishing between the power and the actual use for it, we can consider the case which is the power of seeking judgment, is different from the legal demand and the other forms of the legal procedures, And if the plea in its general meaning represent all the pleading means which the defendant may use to defend himself, in the intention of avoiding the issue of decision in the benefit of the plaintiff whether these means were directed to the rightness of the claim procedures without tackling the right in the subject of the case which the plaintiff claim so he may avoid temporary the judging against himself by what the plaintiff claim like non specialty, or these means may be directed to the deny the plaintiff power in using the claim where he may seek the mean by which the owner of the right may use to protect his right and if the mean may be permitted to be used, or the condition of using is not permitted for the unavailability of one of the general conditions for accepting the claim, so judging by non specialty of the court and not accepting the claim do not mean the lapse of the right of the claim where owner of the right can make another claim again before the specialized courts. And if the time of making an administrative lawsuit is represented by the time interval which is limited by law to make the abolish claim during it, where it is arranged on this lapse of time the lapse of the right of making claim because the stab period for the abolish is characterized by its shortness in comparisons with the times of the stab in the other administrative cases, and as a result it is nonsuit period and not expire period because passing the period of stabbing lead to the failure of the right of stab and the case is null for passing of the stab period, and the right may be lost in making lawsuit for previous judgment in its subject which is plead in an on going claim, in intention of denying the right of the plaintiff in making lawsuit, for the reason of similar previous cases which were judged before between the parties, intending the preventing of the court from looking the case stiking to the concept of the judged cases, and this may be something absolute on the all for the issued judgment with the abolish and may be relative between the parties of the claim by the issued judgment in the complete judgment cases, and that the administrative case may be lapsed by not judging by concession, leaving, and making peace and these causes gathered commonly in making the reason to lapse the case in subject for the lapse of the conflict and these reasons despite their differences, they are gathered by the concession of one party or it may be counter concessionThe administrative judgment in Iraq took some of the reasons of the lapsing for the administrative claim prior to judge their subject, but it did not tackle all the causes of the lapse which go ahead with the nature of the administrative conflicts as it tackled by the comparative administrative law and for the absence of a law that organize the administrative procedures in Iraq and for the existence of many restrictions which obstacle the specialty of the administrative law in Iraq and for the shortage of the studies that tackled this subject and for not been tackled by the administrative jurisprudence in comparison to other legal subject we choose this subject.
