Share
فاعلية برنامج ليبمان لفلسفة الاطفال في تعليم التفكير عند تلاميذ المرحلة الابتدائية == Effecthvenes Program Lipman Of Teaching Thinking Skilles For Primary School Students
Author name:
ميعاد غافل حمادي الهاشمي
Supervisor name:
وحيدة حسين علي الركابي
General topic:
Psychology
Specific topic:
Educational Psychology
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Education
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
04T1578 - p.pdf
Abstract:
يفرض القرن الحادي والعشرين متغيرات جديدة وعالم سريع التغير تغزو فيه المعرفة والتكنلوجيا مفاصل الحياة العامة وتطورات كبيرة في المجالات جميعها، وهذه التطورات ينبغي مواكبتها اسوة بالمجتمعات الغربية التي سبقتنا في مجالات التطور، الامر الذي دعا الى التركيز حول | The twenty first century imposes new changes and a rapidly changing world in which knowledge and technology covered all aspects of public life as well as giant developments in all fields. These developments must be coped with as it had been done by western societies who had preceded us in progress spheres, the thing that urged to focus on the ways of the thinking teaching. All this laid on education further essential and important burdens. Therefore, educational institutions must not only provide information but they also teach the ways of teaching to deal with various fields of life, and they must not turn the minds of learners into stores of knowledge, but they have to provide them with the keys to those stores and teach them how to utilize these information when needed.Reasoning thinking is considered as one of the advanced methods of thinking, and it is regarded one of the bases of knowledge development and intellectual progress. Logical processes help the individual to reach new conclusions of knowledge. When mind operates the reasoning process, it passes through steps similar to those of the scientific approach till reaching theories and laws. In reasoning, the individual gets the characteristics of the attitude depending on his previous experiences.This research aims at : Knowing the validity of a teaching - learning program lipman of teaching thinking skills for primary school students. The research sample consisted of (30) forth - primary - year students from the secand general directorate of education of Baghdad - Russafa (for the academic year 2014 - 2015). They were divided into an experimental and control groups after checking the variables of (intelligence, age, academic level of both father and mother, the marks obtained by the students and their general level). The researcher applied the test of the thinking skills which contien (16) queshins and for skills its (classifcayes,concolosun,comparative and askeds) ,to developed thiking skills of primary school student (forth class) and the psychometric characteristics were obtained for both of them. Then, the test and the program were applied successively on the research sample.The research tried to verify the following hypotheses1 - There are differences of statistical indication at the level (0.05) in thinking skills between the pre and post texts of the control group.2 - There are differences of statistical indication between the pre and post tests at the level (0.05) in thinking skills of the experimental group.3 - There are differences of statistical indication at the level (0.05) in thinking skills of the per and post test for both the experimental and control groups.4 - There are differences of statistical indication at the level (0.05) in thinking skills of the per and the reprived tests for the experimental group in the test of thinking.In order to verify the results of the research non - parametric statistical methods were used, and the outcomes showed that there were statistically indicating differences between the experimental and control groups and in favor of the experimental group and as follows : 1 - Accepting the zero hypothesis and rejecting the alternative hypothesis as the counted value was (3,432) and it was more than the (25) table value.2 - Rejecting the zero hypothesis and accepting the alternative hypothesis as the counted was (36) and it was less than the (25) table value.3 - Rejecting the zero hypyhesis and accepting the alternative hypothesis as the counted value reached (0) which was less than the table value that reached (56).4 - Rejecting the zero hypothesis and accepting the alternative hypothesis as the counted value reached (0,83) which was more than the criterion value of (0,60).In the light of the results, the researcher submitted a number of recommendations and suggestions
Summary:
04T1578 - A.pdf
References:
04T1578 - R.pdf
