Share
تقويم ادارة الخطر في المشروع على وفق المواصفة الدولية ISO31000 : 2009 في عينة من مشاريع شركة المنصور العامة للمقاولات الانشائية == Assessment The Risk Management In The Project According To International Standard (ISO31000 : 2009) In A Sample of Projects, Al - Mansour Contracting Construction
Author name:
حسنين حميد شاكر الزبيدي
Supervisor name:
ايثار عبد الهادي ال فيحان المعموري
General topic:
Administration and Economics
Specific topic:
Industrial Management
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Baghdad - Faculty Of Administration And Economics
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
07T3543 - p.pdf
Abstract:
تضمنت الدراسة الحالية (تقويم ادارة الخطر في المشروع على وفق المواصفة الدولية (ISO31000 : 2009) في عينة من مشاريع شركة المنصور العامة للمقاولات الانشائية)، اذ يعد موضوع انجاز المشاريع على وفق الميزانية والجدولة الزمنية وضمن متطلبات الجهة المستفيدة ومستوى ال | The study examined the current "Assessment the risk management in the project according to international standard (ISO31000 : 2009) in a sample of projects, Al - Mansour Contracting construction" , as is the subject of complete projects on budget and Scheduling and within the requirements of the beneficiary and the level of quality corresponding to the specifications of important topics that have a significant impact on the lack of lag and the slowdown in the completion of these projects. The essence of risk management in the project to anticipate needs and identify uncertainty which would threaten the process of achieving the objectives of the project from delays in delivery dates and cost overruns which causes the failure of the project itself and the lack of confidence in the project manager.We have embodied the problem of the study in the weakness of the adoption of the community studied and appointed researched to the trends of risk management of modern, including the International Standard (ISO 31000 : 2009) and Standard Australian / New Zealand (AS / NZS 4360 : 2004) may encounter a project many of the risks in the exercise of its activities, and vary the ability of projects to bear this risks according to their nature.The aim of the study to detect the level of risk management in the study population, and for this purpose, a questionnaire was used according to the Standard Australian / New Zealand (AS/NSZ4360 : 2004) for the diagnosis of risk management at the level of Al - Mansour Contracting Construction (study population). And have been adapted according to the ISO standard )ISO31000 : 2009) and the Iraqi environment, as applied to a sample of managers of the company's departments and the total of the sample (11) individual data were collected by questionnaire and field visits, interviews and used a number of statistical methods for data processing of the middle mean and the percentage, standard deviation and the severity of the answer for the purpose of description answers to the sample, with respect to construction three projects (study sample), has used a checklist to according to the terms of ISO standard (ISO31000 : 2009) in each of the (building project the province of Baghdad, and the project of establishing corridors of Ibn AL - Bitar hospital, and the project of establishing the role of judges / Karkh) and use the arithmetic mean weighted and the percentage of the extent of conformity for the diagnosis of the gap compared to reality, the actual implementation and documentation of requirements of international standard (ISO31000 : 2009), also used the matrix of probability and impact in order to determine the level of threats to the three projects (sample study) and prioritize those risks using technology Failure Mode & Effect Analysis.Was reached to a set of conclusions, including : 1. does not company's includes an independent function and specialized risk management essential role that the company faced in the implementation of their projects, and that the president is the executive sponsor for the management of risk and limited role in providing advice, support and increase awareness of the benefits of risk management.2. take the organizational culture in the company's position of neutrality in the desire to take risk or not to deal with him.3. weakness company's training on risk management and policy with regard to practices and procedures for management and afford, in spite of their need to understand the company's technical skills in the management of risk.The study concluded, among the most important recommendations : 1. the need to develop a new section entitled (risk management) is the primary activity of the various risks in an efficient and better able to anticipate fluctuations and rapid changes in the surrounding environment.2. requires the application of risk management actors need to instill a culture of risk management in the values and habits of members of the company and the willingness and ability to withstand various conditions to address them.3. The company must consider risks is an opportunity through which to achieve their goals and support creativity in achieving those goals.
