Share
رقابة الرئيس الاداري على اعمال مرؤوسيه : دراسة مقارنة == Chief Administrative Oversight To The Work Of His Subordinates Comparative Study
Author name:
بيداء جبار احمد
Supervisor name:
علي احمد حسن اللهيبي
General topic:
Law
Specific topic:
Administrative Law
Degree:
Master
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Law - Department Of Public Law
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
13T1464 - p.pdf
Abstract:
تناولت هذة الدراسة رقابة الرئيس الاداري على اعمال مرؤوسيه، بوصفها من الوسائل الايجابية الفعالة اذا مامورست بكفاءة سواء كانت سابقة ام لاحقة، فالرقابة السابقة تؤدي الى تبصرة المرؤوسين في تادية اعمالهم على نحو امثل وذلك عن طريق توجيه الاوامر الرئاسية، اما | This study controlled the administrative head of the acts of his subordinates, as a means of positive effective if Mamorst efficiently whether an earlier or later, surveillance is the former lead to enlightenment subordinates in carrying out their work optimally, by directing orders presidential, either post - audit, they lead to make sure that private business subordinates carried out in accordance with the laws and orders directed to them, as well as the detection of irregularities and deficiencies in the work of subordinates and evaluating through to comment on the work of subordinates. It is recognized that the control exercised by the administrative head the acts of his subordinates are not confined to monitor the respect for the principle of legality not violating any laws and regulations only, but extends to determine the suitability of the administrative work. However, the control exercised by the administrative head of a border must be held on the appropriate laws and regulations, if the head of the administrative ordering presidential subordinates, and the commitment of subordinates to undergo her obedience, the obedience is not absolute, but differ as to whether legitimate or illegitimate. If the head of the administrative control of the subsequent acts of his subordinates and manifestations and authentication solutions, modify, cancel and withdraw the decisions of his subordinates, but the authority to modify and cancel and withdraw the decisions of his subordinates are not absolute, but rather has its limits differ as to whether those decisions organizational or individual legitimate or illegitimate. The study concluded that the most important conclusion we explained the results and proposals.
