Share
ما فيه نظر في تاج العروس للزبيدي (ت١٢٠٥هـ) : تحليل وتقويم == What is Included in a Review of Taj Al-Arous by Al-Zubaidi (D. 1205 A.H) – Analysis and evaluation
Author name:
عقيد حسين مطر
Supervisor name:
حسن جعفر صادق
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Baghdad - Ibn Rushd College Of Education For Human Sciences - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
T86809 - p.pdf
Abstract:
Abstract This study sought to identify the places where it was described as looking at the crown (Taj Al-Arous) of the bride through analysis and evaluation, and it was tempted by two important things: The first: Theoretical, concerned with the circulation of the phrase (there is a view) in religious cognitive sciences, and its meaning in it, and then attracting it to the Arabic lexicon, and employing it as a critical judgment by the lexicon maker on the words about which suspicions are still hovering, or those that deviated from the characteristic of Arab speech the eloquent, trusted in their eloquence; Be polite with what he said. The context was sufficient to clarify the meaning of the phrase. Likewise, he was concerned with a statement of the main motives for consideration by the lexicographer, and the criteria that he invoked in the objection. To prove the validity of what he claimed. The second: Procedural, concerned with the selection of words and their meanings, which were the subject of consideration by the author of the lexicon, according to the determinants followed by the researcher, and reference was made to them in the preface, then the study headed towards analyzing words in an analysis consistent with what is required by academic scientific research. The issues of this section of the study have been divided into morphological and semantic issues, and issues related to lexical industry techniques such as control and interpretation, with an additional introduction to each of these phenomena. The nature of the scientific material required that the study be divided into three chapters. the first was entitled (what was considered in the exchange buildings), and included two sections, the first of which was marked: (what was considered in the buildings of the collection), which dealt with the collection of cracking. The second was entitled (what looked at the structures of vocabulary) and it included four things, the first concerned with the buildings of sources, and the second contract for exaggerated formulas, and dealt with in the third superfluous letters, and the fourth came in the masculine and feminine. The second chapter was entitled (what is in the significance of the view) has required the scientific article to be divided into two sections, the first of which was to talk about what questioned the significance of the words, and the second came in the criticism of semantic relations between words, and manifestations of semantic development, such as opposites, and general and particular. The third chapter has been held to criticize (control, interpretation) and was on two sections as well. The first of them was held for criticism (adjusting the structures of words), and it included three things: what was set depending on the drawing of the pen, what was set by the phrase, and what was set by the counterpart. The second section of the lexical interpretation . Finally, the study concluded with the most important results that the researcher reviewed briefly.
Summary:
f47142ff64.pdf
References:
6863570565.pdf
