Share
استقلال القضاء الدستوري واثره في الرقابة على دستورية القوانين : دراسة مقارنة == The independence of the constitutional judiciary and its impact in controlling the constitutionality of laws : Comparative Study
Author name:
حیدر علي ضایف خطار الموزاني
Supervisor name:
ولید خشان زغیر الموسوي
General topic:
Law
Specific topic:
Constitutional Law
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Thi-Qar - Faculty Of Law - Department Of Public Law
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Dhi Qar
First pages:
13T1597 - p.pdf
Abstract:
Many states with different constitutional systems insist on the provident of legal guarantees which ensure the independence of the judiciary in to tally, because it is the apparatus which is responsible for the applying the laws andmaintaining the legal rights and freedoms, but this assistance of the independence of judiciary appears in large in the constitutional judiciary. Whether it is practicing by special courts, or by other kind or types of courts.Because the most important tasks of the constitutional judiciary is maintaining legacy and constitutional freedoms and rights. So, all constitutions in all different countries, which practice judiciary censorship on constitutionality of laws, concerning to establish the independence constitutional judiciary on rigid basis, and ensure the objectivity of constitutional agents to enable the judiciary to practice its roles correctly. The Constitutional Court is mandated to prevent the authorities from violating the provisions of the Constitution, to prevent the legislative authority from issuing laws that violate the provisions of the Constitution and to prevent the executive authority from issuing regulations and regulations that violate the Constitution. This role is exercised through constitutional supervision, It is imperative that the constitutional judiciary grant the independence necessary to exercise this role vis - a - vis the rest of the authorities. The legislative and executive authorities may try to influence the independence of the constitutional judiciary by limiting its role in monitoring through its intervention in its organization or its activities, Whist; therefore the constitutional independence ofthe judiciary is of no choice of it
