مشاركة
استقلال القضاء الدستوري واثره في الرقابة على دستورية القوانين : دراسة مقارنة == The independence of the constitutional judiciary and its impact in controlling the constitutionality of laws : Comparative Study
اسم المؤلف:
حیدر علي ضایف خطار الموزاني
اسم المشرف:
ولید خشان زغیر الموسوي
الموضوع العام:
القانون
السنة:
2017
الموضوع الدقيق:
القانون الدستوري
الدرجة:
ماجستير
الجامعة:
جامعة ذي قار - كلية القانون - قسم القانون العام
اللغة:
العربية
مكان الجامعة:
ذي قار
الصفحات الاولى:
13T1597 - p.pdf
المستخلص:
Many states with different constitutional systems insist on the provident of legal guarantees which ensure the independence of the judiciary in to tally, because it is the apparatus which is responsible for the applying the laws andmaintaining the legal rights and freedoms, but this assistance of the independence of judiciary appears in large in the constitutional judiciary. Whether it is practicing by special courts, or by other kind or types of courts.Because the most important tasks of the constitutional judiciary is maintaining legacy and constitutional freedoms and rights. So, all constitutions in all different countries, which practice judiciary censorship on constitutionality of laws, concerning to establish the independence constitutional judiciary on rigid basis, and ensure the objectivity of constitutional agents to enable the judiciary to practice its roles correctly. The Constitutional Court is mandated to prevent the authorities from violating the provisions of the Constitution, to prevent the legislative authority from issuing laws that violate the provisions of the Constitution and to prevent the executive authority from issuing regulations and regulations that violate the Constitution. This role is exercised through constitutional supervision, It is imperative that the constitutional judiciary grant the independence necessary to exercise this role vis - a - vis the rest of the authorities. The legislative and executive authorities may try to influence the independence of the constitutional judiciary by limiting its role in monitoring through its intervention in its organization or its activities, Whist; therefore the constitutional independence ofthe judiciary is of no choice of it
