Share
تداولية الخطاب التفسيري في كشاف الزمخشري (ت538هـ) : السور المكية انموذجا == Pragmatics Of The Explicatory Discourse In Al - Zamakhshri?S Kashaaf : The Example Of Mecca?S Verses
Author name:
سارة عودة جابر
Supervisor name:
عامر عبد محسن السعد
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Master
University:
University Of Basrah - College Of Literature - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Basrah
First pages:
01T4450 - p.pdf
Abstract:
Praise be to Allah, who has been humiliated for his ability and caused merciful(kindness) reasons. The prayer on the messenger of the best religions. The honourable of the whole creation of God. Mohammed and his virtuous household family and companions. The pragmatics is accounted as one of linguistics branches. It appeared recently for the purpose of studying the semantic (meaning) and makes it more accurate in usage. And in its methodical described the whole complete and comprehensive curriculum in the studied language for teaching the speech in its positions and its different forms according to the intention of the speaker and the conditions of the audience who receive it. If the linguistics has focused(concentrated) on internal performance and levels in studying language and interested in both issues structural and traditional, so that the pragmatics is more accurate because it is interested in the poles of the communicative process to ensure communication. The importance of the topic dealt with the significance of the speech within the light of the context and the surrounding positions. Since the prospector(Alkashaaf) is an interpretation oration (speech). So that the curriculum pragmatics approach will allow that speech to track the language properties of interpretation at all levels especially the indication that is necessary to interact with the oration language thus the interpretation concentrate on semantic (meaning) since the meaning is the core of the communicative process in the pragmatics, so there are bridges between interpretation curriculum represented in (Alkashaaf) and the lingual approach represented in the pragmatics and this issue gives the research a great significance because it will end to a definite result that in our heritage (tradition) aspects (remarks) or theory of pragmatics.The researcher tries to answer on the following questions;1 - Why did Al - zamakhshri write his interpretation ?2 - Who is the beneficiary from the interpretation?3 - How could he influence the recipients?4 - How was the language of interpretation with him? The aim of the research is studying the interpretation completely ( comprehensively) far away from the silence of the text connecting it with the different positions and searching for both goals productive and untold (silent) with stating (expressing) the influence which happened on recipient himself. All this through approaching the traditional text with modern linguistics analysis to find common denominators between deliberative linguistics and our linguistics heritage especially the rhetorical lesson. In the nature of the research divided into preface and three chapters followed by a conclusion with the most important result.The preface includes determination the deliberative term and its relation with the religious oration (speech) especially interpretation.Chapter one applies (speech Acts in interpretation oration for Al - zamakhshri) and divided into two topics : The first in the direct speech Acts. And the second in the indirect speech Acts. Chapter two applies (Argumentation in interpretation speech for Al - zamakhshri) and divided into three topics : 1 - The concept of Argumentation 2 - The features of Argumentation curriculum.3 - The Argumentation scale and its devices.Chapter three is about Deixis and divided into three topics after an introduction about the concept of Deixis and their topics as the followings : 1 - Personal deictics.2 - Timeporal deictics.3 - spatial deictics. And finally we ask praise be to Allah, Lord of the world
