Share
الفروق الدلالية في الاسلوب القراني
Author name:
حسين عودة هاشم
Supervisor name:
فاخر هاشم سعد الياسري
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University Of Basrah - Faculty Of Education - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Basrah
First pages:
01T4537 - p.pdf
Abstract:
The Quranic text is characterized by its brilliant composition and precise choice of words. It has its own manner by which it challenges what the Arabs were exellent in. Since then up to now, the Quranic style has been for a considerable study and meditation when the jurist, these jurisprudent, and the linguist have tend tn irrigate themselves from its sweetness in an attempt to contemplate 011 the distingnishcd connotations of its various manner. The linguists have been reflecting on the iilimitability and rhetoric nature of Holy Quran through using accurate vocabulary items or excellent formation of its installation in an endeavour to justify the intended significance of these marvelous points in spite of their efforts to get the semantic purpose but there was barely an uuanimous concept to happen among the schlars of the Qunrnic text not to reach to an access of the peremptory Quranic text and the real secrets behind using certain structure rather than the other or select an item instead of the other, so this study is bascdon the views of the former semantic meanings of the items and tl1eir occurrence in the context attempting to offer an opinion or to render an idea concerning the the idea of the Quranic Rhetoric through chosing a procedure based on semantic differentiation rising from thevarious Quranic style in a certain context rather than the other considering all Iinguistiv tendencies beginning from Al - Sufy to Al - Mu'jamy and this what distinguish this study from the previous ones. It comprises four sections : section one deals with the semantic discriminativity on the phonetic level through two ways; the first studies sound inside the item structure and the other investigates the comma differences because of its different places.In section two, studies the semantic differences on the level of Morphology through studying the aspect and its divergences such as replacement, suffires, elision, and the study of masculine and feminine forms. Section three is about the semantic distinction on the structured level concerning sertences ellipsis, mentioning , structured deviation, and the contertual ~'.~~~~~ally, section four deals with this aspect or semantics on t~e li~fof·.··d1.~ ·.'.i··t· ~ •. m. si~ficance in the Qnranic text divided into two parts : nomm3[,ablvrrbal a.n~#'arc followed by the results of the study.
