Share
صلاحيات السلطة التشريعية في العراق بين النظرية والتطبيق بعد 2005 == Jurisdictions Of LeGISlative Authority In Iraq Between Practice & Theory After 2005
Author name:
حنان عبد لوتي
Supervisor name:
مها عبد اللطيف حسن الحديثي
General topic:
Political Science
Specific topic:
Political Systems and Public Policies
Degree:
Master
University:
Al-Nahrain University - Faculty Of Political Science - Department Of Political Systems And Public Policies
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
14T698 - p.pdf
Abstract:
This thesis researches in the powers of the legislative authority in the Iraqi parliament in theory and practice. The thesis addressed at the outset the parliamentary system as one of the representative democratic regimes prevailing in the world today, where the political power is divided two between, the first bodies to be expressed in the legislature (parliament), which is directly elected by the people, while the second body, the Executive, is being emerged from the parliament. Many countries around the world has adopted Parliamentarism despite the difference of the internal environment, political, economic and cultural life of their societies. Iraq as well has adopted this system according to the Constitution of 2005. Which deserved research and analysis and comparison between the reality of this system and what should be the parliamentary system, in general, and compare it to the constitutional rules according to the Constitution of 2005, in particular, to identify the strengths and weaknesses, and the reasons for the weakness of the legislative authority in the exercise of their constitutional powers. The thesis has reached a set of conclusions, mainly : 1. The existence of many of the imbalances in the parliamentary practice in the Iraqi parliament, the most important of which was the failure of the House of Representatives in the representation of Iraq as a whole and to speak on behalf of the people as a whole.2. The absence of political opposition in the House of Representatives led to overcome the parliamentary procedures.3. The predominance of the executive authority of the parliament which led to the disruption of the rules of parliamentary oversight and the cooperation between the two authorities.4. The weakness of the political culture of parliamentarians and their ignorance of most of the parliamentary rules and procedures adopted by parliamentary systems.5. The weakness of parliamentary oversight.6. The existence of quota confessional that played a role in weakening the powers of the legislature and continued conflict among political blocks in the House of Representatives.7. The continued absence of Members of the House of Representatives and the lack of serious behavior during discussion on some sensitive issues which preclude holding more than half of the meetings because of lack of a quorum.
