Share
التسويف الاكاديمي وعلاقته باساليب التفكير لدى طلبة الجامعة == Academic Procrastination And Relationship To Thinking Styles Of Undergraduates
Author name:
رحاب نوري لفتة العبادي
Supervisor name:
زينب حياوي بديوي
General topic:
Psychology
Specific topic:
Educational Psychology
Degree:
Master
University:
University Of Basrah - College Of Education For Human Sciences - Department Of Educational And Psychological Sciences
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Basrah
First pages:
04T1602 - p.pdf
Abstract:
يهدف البحث الحالي الى التعرف على : - التسويف الاكاديمي لدى طلبة الجامعة. - الفروق ذات الدلالة الاحصائية في التسويف الاكاديمي لدى طلبة الجامعة حسب المتغيرات ( النوع - التخصص). - اساليب التفكير لدى طلبة الجامعة. - الفروق ذات الدلالة الاحصائية في اساليب التفكي | Title : (Academic Procrastination and Relationship to Thinking Styles of Undergraduates)Current research aims at : - Identifying academic procrastination of undergraduates. - Identifying differences in academic procrastination of undergraduates according to variables (gender and specialization). - Identifying the common thinking styles of undergraduates. - Identifying differences in common thinking styles of undergraduates according to variables (gender and specialization). - Identifying the relationship between academic procrastination level and common thinking styles of undergraduates. Research was conducted to a sample of Al Basra University undergraduates (males and females) according to specialization (i.e. scientific - human) for the academic year 2015 - 2016. For theoretical framework, it concentrated on the following two themes : 1 - Academic procrastination : concept, causing factors, and theories. 2 - Thinking styles : concept, kinds, and theories. Descriptive relational methodology was used to explore the relationship between academic procrastination and common thinking stylesacademic procrastination, and the development of thinking styles through including thinking skills in curricula. As complementary to research, suggestions were concluded for future study such as performing a similar study on a sample of undergraduates with low and high achievement levels. 1 - here were statistically significant differences at (0.05) between mean degrees of the sample according to gender, in favor of males. 2 - There were statistically significant differences at (0.05) between mean degrees of the sample according to specialization. 3 - There was an interaction between gender and specialization related to effects on academic procrastination. Other findings included : 1 - Research sample had more than hypothetical level of common thinking styles. 2 - There were statistically significant differences (at 0.05) between degrees of the sample according to gender in favor of males. 3 - There were no statistically significant differences (at 0.05) between degrees of the sample according to specialization. 4 - There was an interaction between gender and specialization in effects on the four common thinking styles.Moreover, it was found a significant correlation between academic procrastination and common think styles. Results are interpreted and discussed according to the adopted theory of each variable (academic procrastination and thinking styles). Additionally, the results were discussed in relation to literature. The researcher concluded some recommendations included : holding seminars and conferences to decrease academic procrastination and show its passive effects on undergraduates and all levels of society. Moreover, there should beFor procedures, the research was conducted to 800 undergraduates (i.e. 400 respondents as treatment and 400 undergraduates as control group), selected by random stratified method of University faculties.To achieve the goals, Academic Procrastination Scale (63 - items scale divided to behavioral, cognitive and emotional fields) was used; in addition to the translation and using Gregorc's Thinking Styles Scale (15 situations, with four choices per each situation; each respondents are free to choose 2 situations distributed to four fields : concrete sequential, concrete random, abstract random, and abstract sequential. External validity, structure validity indicators and discriminatory validity were considered for the Academic Procrastination Scale. As for Thinking Styles; external validity, translation validity and discriminatory validity were considered. In addition, stability of scales was confirmed through test - retest and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. To verify research procedures and results, the following statistical methodologies were used : (One - sample t - test, two independent samples t - test, two - way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's test for multiple comparisons, relative weight, standard error equation, and Pearson relation coefficient). Research concluded the following findings : 1 - The sample scored higher than hypothesis level in academic procrastination.
Summary:
04T1602 - A.pdf
References:
04T1602 - R.pdf
