Share
دور الحكومة في النظم البرلمانية : دراسة مقارنة ==The Role Of The Government In The Parliamentary System A ( Comparative Study ) == The Role Of The Government In The Parliamentary System A ( Comparative Study )
Author name:
محمد عباس هاشم الفرطوسي
Supervisor name:
احمد عبد القادر مخلص القيسي
General topic:
Political Science
Specific topic:
Political Systems and Public Policies
Degree:
Master
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Political Science
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
14T659 - p.pdf
Abstract:
انطلقت الدراسة الموسومة ( دور الحكومة في النظم البرلمانية "دراسة مقارنة" ) من فرضية مفادها, ان اختلاف دور الحكومة في النظم البرلمانية على وجه العموم وفي النظم المقارنة على وجه الخصوص راجع الى التباين في اليات تشكيلها والصلاحيات الدستورية التي تمارسها, فضل | Our study titled under the name (The role of Government in the Parliamentary Systems : a Comparative Study). It relies on a hypothesis that the different role of government in parliamentary systems is due to the variation in the mechanisms of formation and constitutional powers exercised, as well as the nature of the relationship between the constitutional institutions. The study examined the mechanism of formation the government's constitutional powers in both Iraq and India, as well as other models. Due to the advantage of the government in terms of its broad powers, it becomes a core of the executive branch and the most influential power in parliamentary systems, compared with other contemporary political systems. The study has been divided into three chapters, in addition to introduction and conclusion. The first chapter is the theoretical and conceptual framework for the study, and was divided into two sections, the first section gave an integrated view of the government, including the concept and the mechanism of formation and powers exercised by it, while the second chapter we dealt with the structure and powers of the government in a public parliamentary models, including monarchical and republican models. This chapter was divided into two sections, the first one in which we dealt with the structure and powers of government in the United Kingdom, Kuwait, and the second we dealt with the structural and functional framework for the government of Germany and Italy, while the third has been allocated to stand on comparison of governmental structures in political systems of Iraq and India, and was divided into three sections, the first shed light on the government's role in the Iraqi political system, and the second topic was about the impact of the government in the Indian political system, while the third section devoted to the similarities and differences between the structures of governments in both systems. The study found a number of results, such as the disparity in the formation mechanism of the government and the powers exercised by the parliamentary systems in general, and a typical comparison in particular. the Indian government has practiced broader powers granted by the constitution of government powers, and this disparity in powers and the mechanism of formation has delivered a unique status in terms of the role and the nature of its relationship with the rest of the state institutions in both Iraq and India. In other words, they allowed the Indian government to practice wider role in comparison to the Iraqi government. Obviously, in spite of this variation in the terms of powers in these governments, we can say that the government in both Iraq and India possess broader powers than their counterparts in the mixed systems
