Share
النحو الوظيفي بين المعاصرة وتراث الاصوليين == The Functional Grammar Between Contemporaries And Fundamentalists' Heritage
Author name:
فوزية فهد صخي
Supervisor name:
زينب عبد الحسين بلال السلطاني
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Baghdad
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
01T4203 - p.pdf
Abstract:
The contemporary functional grammar theory could be sought in linguistic Arabic topics without resorting to or linguistic heritage including fundamental heritage which is the subject of our research. The study of both make us more justice for the efforts of fundamentalists from one side and updating our cognition from other side. The research falls into three chapters The first chapter : It deals with functional grammar and its method and that includes three units , the 1st unit : theory of verbal verbs. This theory has been established by the philosopher ( Austen) who was affected by the philosophy of (Fatgh Nishtien) in his theory (the linguistic bases) that being ensued from the philosophy of ( normal language). The most important aspect of this theory is the intend meaning, on other word ,it should know the intention of the speaker in order to know the meaning of speech. After that, (Siral) developed the theory of ( Austen) to classify the verbal actions s to actual actions either be direct or indirect. The second unit is the theory of (Ghutlub Furayjah), he investigated into Nouns in his book (( Use of accounting),the fundamentalists study main structure of word. The third unit is the context and intention , the linguistic event in the contemporary studies has been considered as a basis for that. The third chapter's 1st unit refers to the phrase and its function in structure , the rank , the omission.The change in the phrase components arrangement is for consistency, the subject might come in advance for the purpose of attracting attention or Mubtadaa might come first in the noun phrase for the same purpose. The fundamentalists were aware that the sentences' verbalizations might be conformed, but be different in meanings as to express speaker intention. Some of contemporary figures saw that expression is to uncover contextual relations ,the fundamentalists paid more attention to sentence analysis since the latter occupies high prestige, besides , the fundamentalists concerned with omission which is considered as a fallen element as that being imposed for the safety of sentence structure. The second unit is the predicting and composition sentence. Austen had distinguished between the descriptive and accomplished sentence. The fundamentalists had also distinguished between the predicating and composition sentences. The third unit assigned for an Order.The third chapter falls into two units , the 1st unit assigned for dialogue necessity and this related to the favor of the philosopher of the language (Ghryaz). The latter discovered the difference between (what is said and what is to be accomplished). The fundamentalists considered the dialogue necessity as conception through differentiating between the spoken and concept and the context has a big role to realize the meaning in the phrase. The other unit in the third chapter is the interpretation ,having a large role in tightening the text. It could be noted the similarity and difference between the contemporary and fundamentalist research, sometimes the latter surpasses the former due to its richness , but the contemporary characterized with accuracy despite the need to be investigated asto develop it.
