Share
رواية عزازيل ليوسف زيدان : دراسة تاويلية == Novel Azazel Youssef Zeidan Interpretive study
Author name:
هبة محمد رحيم حسن
Supervisor name:
جاسم حميد جودة
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Babylon - College Of Education For Human Sciences - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Babylon
First pages:
01T4893 - p.pdf
Abstract:
وقد نتج عن هذين الخطين مقاربتين منهجيتين للنص هما : مقاربة (ايزر) التي حافظت على المقولة المركزية للظاهراتية (الانطلاق من الاشياء ذاتها), وتعد هذه المقاربة قد استوفت ما طرحته فلسفة هوسرل, اذ انها حاولت مزج القارئ والنص في منطقة واحدة مغايرة للنص وللقارئ, وسميت هذه المقاربة بنظرية (الاثر)، اما المقاربة الثانية فقد وجدت في خارج النص موجها مهما في معرفة معاني النص، وانتهت هذه المقاربة الى نظرية (التلقي) التي يتزعمها الناقد الالماني (ياوس).وقد تبنت الدراسة في قراءتها لرواية عزازيل مقاربة الاثر, وعليه قسمت الدراسة على فصلين مسبوقين بتمهيد سلط الضوء على الاصل الفلسفي للتاويل وفق عدد من العنوانات تضمنت : النشاة والدلالة والتشكل المعرفي, وتناول الفصل الاول : (القارئ الضمني وبناء المخطط) : المستوى الاول من مستويات النظرية, ونظرنا فيه الى القارئ الضمني، بانه ذات انتقائية وبنائية، وانه يمارس هاتين الوظيفتين في لحظة واحدة, وقد تمثل هذا الدور في ترتيب الذخيرة النصية بشكل متدرج في بناء المعنى وصولا الى البنية الادراكية، باعادة صياغة الثيمة المركزية في الرواية, وتوزيعها على مجموعة عنوانات تمثل الخط البياني الاول للصعود الى المعنى, وقد سبق التحليل بمدخل نظري للفيلسوف (رومان انجاردن) ورائد النظرية (ايزر). اما الفصل الثاني : (الفجوة والتاويل المتسق) : فقد تناول المستوى الثاني للنظرية عبر خطوتين : الاولى كشف منظور الرواية، والثانية تمثلت في تفريد المناظير كل على حدة، وقد حاولت الدراسة توزيع الثيمة المركزية على هاتين الخطوتين، ومن ثم كشف مسار الثيمة المركزية ومتابعة بناها لكل منظور، ومدى علاقة المناظير الفردية بالبنية الادراكية الكلية.تمثل هذه النظرية لحظة قرائية واحدة، والفصل في هذه اللحظة فصل منهجي, فقد وجد البحث ان نظرية (ايزر) قامت على تشريح هذه اللحظة القرائية الى ثلاثة مستويات : وهي ذاتها المستويات التي تحقق عملية الفهم, المستوى الاول : (بناء المخطط) وهو مستوى ترتيب المعطيات الحسية, اما المستوى الثاني : (الفجوات) تمثل بكشف الفجوات عبر رصد مناظير الرواية, وانشاء الترابطات القصدية بينها, اما المستوى الثالث : (التاويل المتسق), وفيه تكشف الثيمات الاعمق التي ركدت في قاع الرواية وحركت معانيها الظاهرة, وبسبب التقارب بين المستوى الثاني والثالث(الفجوة والتاويل المتسق) دمجتا في فصل واحد, وانتهت الدراسة الى مجموعة من النتائج تم تثبيتها في اخر الرسالة.وتعد جدة التناول من اهم الصعوبات التي واجهت الباحثة, فالنظرية تتطلب تناول النص بطريقة مغايرة عن المقاربات التحليلية للنص, مما سبب ندرة في وجود دراسات استوفت المستويات الثلاثة للنظرية, تساعد الباحثة وترشدها في التحليل. وفي الختام اتقدم بخالص الشكر وعميق الامتنان لاستاذي الدكتور جاسم حميد جودة على ما منحني من حسن الرعاية ولطف المعاملة، فاليه يعزى الفضل في انجاز هذه الدراسة، واشكره على تحمل مشاق متابعة البحث عبر مراحله وحرصه الشديد على ان ينال البحث اهدافه المرجوة، فقد تابعني خطوة بخطوة حتى اكتمل. اسال الله تعالى ان يجزيه عني خير الجزاء. | Praise be to Allah and peace and blessings on Muhammad, the Seal senders and The God of the good and virtuous and companions Almentajabin later.Gives the interpretation space of dialogue between the text and the recipient is not found in other monetary approaches, and this talk made him leave the unilateral vision that accompanied approaches the other in the vision of the text, as are cash and other approaches to the idea of congruence between the text and its origin, whether the origin Mata or a pattern or context, Valtooal underlines the difference between the text and reference, and acknowledges that the text must be sponsored by an independent entity and to listen to him even open to the deep meanings.Interpretive appeared in German culture exclusively, has resulted in two lines Velsvian : focused, one of the historical and psychological dimension, and promised them two dimensions rear Asogan structural and semantic structure, so that the text is on the horizon of history myself, and accordingly determine the interpretation to be technically focused on detecting the relationship between the text and the back Vdhaih (mental / historical), in ways that put Chelormakhar and Wilhelm Dilthey, which is a major Winding down in time to do the reading, but the two have not graduated from the idea of congruence and commonality that prevailed in cultural thought of that era, because there is a letter and there outside the text (of my mind, historic), text derives its existence and strength by approaching towards the outside (mental / historical), so they signed this hermeneutical line under the argument (to understand the text as understood by its producer) The process of interpretation was confirmed proportion of the text of the author.The other line has appeared with the German philosopher (Husserl), the founder of phenomenology philosophy, have tried (Husserl) create a synthesis between science and philosophy, and held out the ambition to achieve a scientific philosophy described as the science of essences, and the profile is systematic of this philosophy is located under the argument (starting of the same things).Tried (Husserl) his philosophy that a marriage is held between (the mind and the world) / (subject and object) in a single unit, in a region that does not belong to the mind and to the world called it (the feeling), and thus dissolved the lines philosophical (physical / ideal), and Sarhama unit one has established a philosophy as a result of this intermingling entity cognitively different from the two parties, an independent identity from them called (awareness), phenomenon is when Husserl equal awareness which is starting to look a philosophical has a point, and this perception differs from the vision of the philosophies of the concept of phenomenon as this picture of the phenomenon that entails She refused an autopsy or increase.This has resulted in the two lines two approaches methodological text : the approach (WISER), which maintained the central argument of the phenomenology (starting from the same things), and the longer this approach has satisfied what expounded the philosophy of Husserl, as it tried blending the reader and the text in one area differently of the text and the reader, and called this approach the theory (impact), while the second approach has been found in the outside of the text directed important to know the meanings of the text, and ended with this approach to the theory of (receiving), led by the German critic (Iyawas).The study adopted in the reading of the novel Azazel impact approach, and therefore the study was divided into two classes unprecedented boot shed light on the origin of philosophical interpretation according to the number of Anwanat included : Growing significance and conformation cognitive,The first chapter discusses : (implicit reader and the construction of the planned) : the first level of theoretical levels, and we have considered the implicit reader, that selective and building construction, and it is practiced these two functions one moment, may represent a role in arranging text ammunition in a gradual build meaning up to the cognitive structure, re - drafting of the Central by him in the novel and distributed to Anoanat represents the first line chart the rise of a group sense, it was preceded by an introduction to the theory of the analysis of the philosopher (Roman Angardn) and a leading theory (WISER).The second chapter : (gap and consistent interpretation) : it has dealt with the second level of the theory through the first two steps revealed the perspective of the novel, and the second was to individualize perspectives separately, have attempted to study the distribution of the Central by him on these two steps, and then revealed by him track Central and follow - up built for each perspective, and how individual perspectives relationship structure cognitive faculty.This theory represents a moment of literacy and one, the separation at this moment systematically separated, the research found that the theory (WISER) built on the anatomy of these literacy moment into three levels : They are the same standards that achieve the first understanding of the process : (building plan) an arrangement that level data sensual, while the second level (gaps) represent disclose gaps across monitoring perspectives of the novel, and the establishment of linkages intentionality among them, while the third level : (interpretation consistent), and it reveals the deeper themes, which stagnated in the novel floor and moved their meanings phenomenon, due to the convergence between the second and third level (the gap and consistent interpretation) merged in a single season, and ended the study to a group of results was installed in another message.Jeddah is the approach of the major difficulties faced by the researcher, the theory requires eating text differently for analytical approaches to the text, causing a scarcity in the presence of studies met the three levels of theory researcher and help guide it in the analysis.
