Share
معايير التقويم المنهجي لبحوث الاعلام : دراسة في بناء انموذج تقويمي == Critera Evaluative Methodical In Media Research - A Study In Constructing A Model Evaluation
Author name:
وداد نجم عبود الدوغجي
Supervisor name:
احمد عبد المجيد
General topic:
Media
Specific topic:
The Press
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Baghdad - College Of Media
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
15T498 - p.pdf
Abstract:
تشكل البحوث الاعلامية احد انواع النتاجات العلمية والتي يستوجب اخضاعها للبحث والتحليل ؛ اذ تقتضي الضرورة البحثية فحص النتاج العلمي بين المدة والاخرى بهدف معرفة توجهات تلك البحوث وتحديد جوانب القصور والقوة وتقويم الانحرافات التي لا تلحظ الا بوجود دراسة تقو | Media Research is one of the types of scientific outputs, which necessitates be subject of research and analysis; the research was necessary to examine the scientific productions between the duration and the other in order to identify trends that research and identify shortcomings and strengths and correct distortions that are not noticed, but the existence evaluative study so the offspring and see how compliance with the standards adopted, it lies the importance of the orthodontic research to give indications of quality and efficiency level, and contribute to development of calendar standards to measure the quality of the content and its conformity with the approved scientific standards to ensure the safety of the methodological procedures detailed all dimensions and to contribute to improve and improve media research level, discusses the search criteria Evaluative methodology methodology media research levels. All of research and diploma thesis master's and doctorate dissertations of the sections of the Faculty of Information, University of Baghdad and providing a specimen scientific simplified shows Tratibih evaluation criteria adopted by the evaluators Alamein when their calendar methodological and procedural elements, and follow the survey method to reach the goals of the research, of the following : 1. statement deviation indicators of whether or not on the type and content of media research and Identify ways to identify and formulate and employ methodological and procedural elements of the Media Research2. find the strength and weaknesses indicators to evaluate the construction of methodological and procedural elements of the Media Research.3. Determine the quality standards of the elements of the methodology and procedural and performance indicators from the perspective of evaluators based on the discussion and the arbitration of media research.4. determine the degree of quality Altqoamh criteria to determine the researcher and his research and the appointment of the degree of originality and creativity of media research capabilities.5. Check the extent of the type and direction of the correlation between standards of methodological and procedural elements and between quality and originality, creativity and vulnerability criteria and Find calendar model to identify and formulate methodology and procedural elements of the Media Research.To achieve those goals included thesis theoretical study, which represented the second and third chapters; the second chapter discussed the planning and formulation of methodological and procedural elements, while the third chapter included the standard to evaluate media research methodology typical standards, either Applied study has represented the fourth and fifth chapters, since the fourth quarter contained the study analytical and included spammers methodological and procedural media research, which were represented by following style stratified sample analysis, which consisted of (139) Single and researcher followed the style of content analysis to conduct the analysis process. while the fifth chapter included with it a field study of the scale of scientific arbitration in the evaluation of media research and determine the level of quality, and the tastiest distributed to professors in the Faculty of Information, University of Baghdad involved in arbitration media research's (66) using a method of mass survey, consisted of two parts. first demographic data of respondents and the second basic data on paragraphs measure five key was the number of questions stood in this section ( 17) a question, in order to provide the study of scientific specimen. Results of analytical study that level runner - up is the level most prominent user to formulate a media research problems which appear in the published level of descriptive questions compared to using standard assumptions, as well as the presence of the ebb and recorded in the drafting of the importance of media research and palaces in determining the limits of search element and the statement of the scoping study measures , and the element determining statistical methods, focused research information on the practical side more than on the theoretical side with the typical presence in the statement motives view the previous studies, also showed a tendency media research to lines of narrative information when drafting the previous studies component, and the lack of diversity in the study of media phenomena in terms of the method used, but that there is diversity in the use of research tools to reach the objectives of the research, and the commitment of media research formulate and identify the elements of the problem, objectives, statement style select a sample search and methods employ theoretical theory - oriented search criteria, compared to non - compliance to identify previous studies standards and limits of research and a statement of society properties respondent and statistical methods and its use of type. The field study showed that there is a positive relationship between the calendar media researcher capabilities and criteria for evaluating the quality of the methodological and procedural elements level; and the standard of evaluating the quality of media research and criteria for evaluating the quality of the methodological and procedural elements of the level of the level, but that there is a reverse correlation Negative between respondents' characteristics and standard vulnerability when evaluating researcher and calendar his research and included thesis (136) and a table (23) form, and then wrapped up research to provide a set of conclusions and recommendations were revenue (5) supplements describes the research community and appointed by the two forms of analysis and scale.
