Share
التفرد وعلاقته بالتفكير الاخلاقي والمسؤولية الاجتماعية لدى المرشدات التربويات == Individuality And Its Relation With Moral Reasoning And Social Responsibility Of Female Educational Counselors
Author name:
هدى عبد الرزاق محمد الجنديل
Supervisor name:
ازهار عبود حسون الجواري
General topic:
Psychology
Specific topic:
Psychological Counseling and Educational Guidance
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Education
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
04T1591 - p.pdf
Abstract:
يعد دور المرشدة التربوية دورا فاعلا للقيام بمهام عملها الارشادي في المدرسة وهي المسؤولة الاولى عن تخطيط وتنفيذ البرامج الارشادية ومتابعتها , وتعمل المرشدة من خلال العلاقة الارشادية على فهم المسترشدة ومساعدتها على فهم نفسها، واختيار افضل البدائل المتاحة له | Educational female counselor plays a vital role in performing her counseling task in a school. She is firstly responsible on planning, performing and following the counseling programs. The counselor works throughout the counseling relationship to understanding the client, assisting her to understand herself and choosing the best available alternatives according to her awareness and assessment of the social environment requirements. Individuality represents the individual awareness of his abilities, possibilities and aptitudes in addition to self - confidence, distinctiveness, independency and self - control. Where the person knows his job requirements and its success conditions. The female educational counselor individuality represents her distinctiveness in achievement and is obvious in the context of her personal interaction with other female counselors. The present research aims at measuring individuality, moral reasoning and social responsibility of female educational counselors and knowing how ethical reasoning , social responsibility, years of service and academic specialization contribute in individuality. To achieve these aims the researcher has prepared individuality scale depending on Gilligan theory which determine it with four behavioral components : self - conscious increasing, understanding others without following them, pure and good memory and the considerably constant experience. (36) items have been formulated by using reported statements where each item has five ranked alternatives for answering : (always, frequently, sometimes, seldom and never) given them when correcting (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) ,respectively for items formulated towards individuality and the correcting is reversed for items formulated away from individuality. The researcher has ascertained from the discriminatory power of the items and the coefficient of their validity by applying the scale on (400) female counselors chosen randomly categorical. As a result the final form of the scale consist of (33) items for measuring individuality. The researcher has ascertained from the validity of the scale by using face validity through exposing it along with a questionnaire on (12) in psychological sciences and psychometric and also by the indicators of constructing validity through factorial validity and the relation between the item grade with the total grade, also the relation of the item grade with the behavioral component that it belongs to and by the internal relations array among the grades of components. The reliability of the scale has been ascertained by using Alpha - Cronbach formula where it is (0.72) when applying the scale on (50) female counselors. As for the concept of moral reasoning , the researcher has prepared a scaledepending on Gilligan theory which determine it with three behavioral components : expressing emotions, taking care of others feelings and transparency. (30) itemshave been formulated by using the style of verbal situation, for each situation there are threeanswers : the first (selfishness), the second (standards) and the third represents (moral thinking) when correcting they are given grades (1, 2, 3) respectively. The researcher has ascertained from the discriminatory power of the scale items and the coefficient of their validity by applying the scale on (400) female counselors. As a result the final form of the scale consists of (25) items for measuring the ethical thinking. The researcher has ascertained from the validity of the scale by using face validity through exposing it along with a questionnaire on (12) in psychological sciences and psychometric and also by the indicators of constructing validity through factorial validity and the relation between the item grade with the total grade, also the relation of the item grade with the behavioral component that it belongs to and by the internal relations array among the grades of components. The reliability of the scale has been ascertained by using Alpha - Cronbach formula where it is (0.74) when applying the scale on (50) female counselors. As far as the concept of social responsibility is concerned, the researcher has preparedthe social responsibility scale depending on Gilligan theory which determine it with five behavioral components : moral silence, moral emotions, deeply thinking with moral problems, ethical and cognitive association and anti - violence and harmony. (45) items have been formulated by using reported statements where each item has five ranked alternatives for answering : (always, frequently, sometimes, seldom and never) given them when correcting (5, 4, 3, 2, 1) respectively for items formulated towards social responsibility and the correcting is reversed for items formulated against social responsibility. The researcher has ascertained from the discriminatory power of the items and the coefficient of their validity by applying the scale on (400) female counselors chosen randomly categorical. As a result the final form of the scale consist of (39) items for measuring social responsibility. The researcher has ascertained from the validity of the scale by using face validity through exposing it along with a questionnaire on (12) in psychological sciences and psychometric and also by the indicators of constructing validity through factorial validity and the relation between the item grade with the total grade, also the relation of the item grade with the behavioral component that it belongs to and by the internal relations array among the grades of components. The reliability of the scale has been ascertained by using Alpha - Cronbach formula where it is (0.79) when applying the scale on (50) female counselors. After ascertaining from the psychometric properties of the research scale and their items, they are applied on the major sample of the research which consists of (300) female counselors randomly categorical chosen according to the variables of academic specialization and years of service. The data of the present research have been analysed by using the statistical package of social sciences (SPSS) and the results show the following : 1 - Female counselors are characterized by individuality, moral reasoning and social responsibility.2 - Both of social responsibility and the academic specialization contribute in predicting of individuality whereas moral reasoning and years of service do not contribute in predicting individuality. Accordingly, the researcher has recommended a number of recommendations such as the necessity of enhancing the care of female counselors with their individuality because it considers from the important positive aspects of their personalities. The researcher has suggested to conduct future studies like conducting the same variables on male counselors and then comparing its results with the results of the present research.
Summary:
04T1591 - A.pdf
References:
04T1591 - R.pdf
