Share
فلسفة نظام الحكم في العراق القديم بين النظام اللامركزي والنظام المركزي : دراسة تاريخية == Phylosohpy Of Reign System In Iraq Between The Decentralized And Centralized System (A Historical Study
Author name:
علي احمد عبد الكريم الجبوري
Supervisor name:
مزهر محسن الخفاجي
General topic:
History
Specific topic:
Ancient History
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Baghdad - Ibn Rushd College Of Education For Human Sciences
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
11T2838 - p.pdf
Abstract:
Now and after we had finished our thesis writing, we reached to a set of conclusions, can be concluded in the following : First : The emerge of the state in Mesopotamia and whatever the contrariety was in determine its history and whatever the variousness of its nominations whether it was a civil state, a civil kingdom, or a civil town state; the emerge of this state was a natural result of gathering its trinity strategy represented by in developing its political boarders, developing the economy of its society and completing its political and administrative institutions. The rivalry and struggle between town states had rushed in emerging this state since early dynasties period (3200B.C.), and what had accompanied that rivalry and struggle of overwhelming one on another to end that matter by emerging one distance per state in the time of the leader Lugal Zage - Si. Second : The concept of intellectual, religious and political coexistence, interaction and integration between the local clans (Sumerians) and the expatriated clans (AL - Jazreen), had reflected a historical formation of a greatest civilized unit in the history. Also what had those people inherited from their ancestors and their success in uniting their state whether by coalition , peaceful uniting ,or annexation through military transgression had led those people to succeed later in build their decentralized state. Third : As soon as the matter prepared to Sargon of Akkad (2367 - 2316B.C.) , and his control on the political matters in the country ,he declared his strong state demanding a shifting process from political and administrative decentralization in rule to declare his strong centralized state and stating himself a king on the whole geographic territory of Mesopotamia and declaring himself a king on Summer and Akkad until the political , economic and military principals accomplished in his time who succeeded in them to start establishing a civilized , historical and political unit of a new kind where were the strong will and the political wisdom essences for the king and his ancestors the great rule in continuing their centralized state. Forth : The return of the Sumerian rule in the reign of the third Ur kingdom (260 - 1995B.C.), and changing the ruling essence didn’t witness a lax in the centralized reign but it witnessed a development and a new establishment of the strong Akkadian political centralized rule system. So through a deep and accurate sight to what had don each of Ur - Nammu, Shuaiki, and his sons shall give us an ambition presented in the will of this state and its kings to continue the style of the centralized reign were the kings in the Third Ur Dynasty gather between the religious, political, administrative and executive authorities; in other word we can say they tried to gather between the worldly and religious authorities in their centralized ruling system. The third kingdom of Ur didn’t continue Long because two pressures the first ; internal ,presented by the pressure of the Amorite migrations and the second ; is external , presented by Elamite plotting and inciting the Loubi clans in the north ;so both pressures had exhausted the Third Ur State politically and economically to last by Gutian occupation to Mesopotamia. Fifth : The system of the Amorite town states rule didn’t last for a long time (2006 - 1792B.C.), where one of the strong Amorite leaders and by that we mean the king Hammurabi (1792 - 1752B.C.), controlled the state and succeeded in uniting the country and started in inauguration of a united civil centralized state. This matter is what made its king endeavor to establish a centralized style reign after he melt the town states system in one connected with one center and uniting its legislative system through submitting all its kingdoms and regions related to it , to one constitution (one legislation), and also uniting its religious theology in one centralized religion and uniting its military institutes and connecting them with the king and enlarging its army by applying conscription which prepared its rulers politically and militarily ,so the reign of Hammurabi achieved the trinity of the civil state that is after accomplishing its judicial, executive , legislative and even the military authorities
Summary:
11T2838 - A.pdf
References:
11T2838 - R.pdf
