Share
الارتباط في اجراءات التقاضي : دراسة مقارنة == Link in litigation proceedings Comparative Study
Author name:
مروى عبد الجليل شنابة حميد
Supervisor name:
هادي حسين الكعبي
General topic:
Law
Specific topic:
Civil Procedure Law
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Babylon - Faculty Of Law - Department Of Private Law
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Babylon
First pages:
13T1727 - p.pdf
Abstract:
The idea of a link between procedural work has a significant role and can not be underestimated within the procedural structures of the various civil law systems, reflecting the full effectiveness of the various procedural tools in those systems. The procedural work is thus linked to the legislator's objective of granting objective, Legal persons. By establishing the link between procedural action and its valuation, a dispute resolution before the court can be settled within the principle of the economy of proceedings in terms of time or expenditure or through which it is possible to put an end to conflicting provisions that are not easily enforceable in resolving the dispute before the Court in a comprehensive manner from all its elements , As if the link had broadened the scope of the litigation against the competent court to accept new applications or to include other related claims; in other words, the link between the procedural proceedings would bring justice to the proceedings. Accordingly, the work of the association is defined as a procedural concept in the field of litigation, defined as any positive course that is part of the proceedings may relate to its initiation, participation in or termination of its liability, direct procedural effect, and an indirect objective effect of legal protection of the rights to be protected. However, what is worth mentioning is that these procedures differ in terms of their content, form and people. Some are issued by the judge, such as judicial decisions and judgments, and others are initiated by his assistants such as the judicial assistant, informants or experts. The other part of the proceedings is carried out by the litigants or their. agents or third parties, Each of these procedural actions has a specific objective that the legislator seeks to achieve by organizing each litigation procedure. However, some of these actions can only be achieved by linking it with another procedural action or by establishing a link between more than one procedural action. Since the legislator aims at the unity of the existing case or the simplification of its procedures, we find it in certain subjects that necessitates the link between procedural action and another or between more than procedural work and other topics we find that opponents or judges or even others sometimes activate the idea of the link between procedural actions, The legislator aims at simplifying the formality of procedures by simplifying the formality of procedures, thus simplifying the performance of its work and thus reducing the severity of this formality, in such a way as to minimize the cases of procedural waste and to summarize the cases and related claims. In other words, engagement can only be achieved through legal rules that must be allowed or allowed to be realized between procedural actions in accordance with the legislator's philosophy of how to achieve the objectives they have addressed in judicial proceedings. It is therefore possible to define it as a legal idea created by the procedural law to indicate the link between a procedure and another of the proceedings between different procedural systems or in a single procedural system and can be achieved even within a framework of procedural action; Conflicting or difficult to implement and thus achieve the proper functioning of justice in the proceedings. The correlation between procedural actions reflects the controls on which litigation is based, both in terms of the economics of the proceedings, in terms of time and expenses, or in terms of preventing contradictory or difficult provisions, and thus ensuring the proper functioning of justice in the proceedings. Through the organization of the rules of the Code of Civil Procedure, under which the substantive rules are put into practice, justice is also the objective that the judge must achieve by performing his function by applying the law procedural or substantive to the dispute.
