الخلاف الفقهي في احكام الاطعمة والاشربة : دراسة موازنة == Jurisprudence Dispute In Food And Drinks Provisions
Author name:
زينب هادي جابر مهدي اسد
Supervisor name:
عقيل رزاق نعمان الموسوي
General topic:
Islamic Sciences
Specific topic:
Quran Sciences
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Baghdad - Ibn Rushd College Of Education For Human Sciences
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
00T1508 - p.pdf
Abstract:
It is known that the Islamic Jurisprudence science is one the most important Sharia sciences, as we reach the knowledge of Sharia laws by it, and one of the its most important parts, is what aims at food and drinks provisions, for the significance it holds in a person's life.Allah said in Quraish Surrah "Let them adore the Lord of this House, Who provides them with food against hunger, and with security against fear (of danger)" Quarish (4 - 3), as he placed food in an preceding position over security for the importance it has in any given time or place, and as the role of jurisprudence is renewed one, so for every happening a Sharia law is available.Out of those facts is the subject who was introduced late of the Sharia scripts age, due to the development of the current age and its means, which helped create a new types of foods and drinks, differs by the culture of the peoples.Treatise Parts : - A preliminary chapter to explain the meaning of the treatise words, and three chapters more with a conclusion.The preliminary chapter is then separated into two parts; the first described the jurisprudence dispute in concept and causes, while the second talked about the concept of foods and drinks with the jurisprudence laws and its importance.The first chapter however, dealt with the dispute in (hunting and slaughtering animals laws), which had three parts, the first about the jurisprudence dispute in hunting laws, the second is the jurisprudence dispute in slaughtering laws, and the final is the jurisprudence dispute in invented problems.The second chapter took the subject of (dispute in foods laws), and was separated into three parts too, the first talked about the dispute of animal foods, the second is about the jurisprudence dispute of non - animal foods (frozen), while the third discussed the (dispute in drinks laws), which is also separated into two parts, the first is about forbidden and allowed drinks, while the second dealt with the dispute in innovated drinks.The conclusion is then presented after the end of chapters, which I used to demonstrate the results I have reached.So and after this brief trip through the highlights of the treatise, it's time for some of the most standing results reached : • The laws regarding the slaughtering of animals suggest that our religion has taken the animal rights into consideration, by looking into the available evidence.• Islam has approbated the interdict of some food types, as the frog for an example.• Most of the jurisprudence dispute in foods and drinks laws, is not a direct result to the nature of those foods and drinks, but a more relative to its means, such as the machine used in the hunt, or the hunter itself, besides the adding or removing of something that will affect the interdict or not
Summary:
00T1508 - A.pdf
References:
00T1508 - R.pdf
