مقاييس اللغة لابن فارس (ت395هـ) والصحاح للجوهري (ت400هـ) : دراسة لغوية == Language Standards For Ibn Faris And Asahah For Jawhari : The Study Of Linguistic Balancing) Thesis Submitted By The Student A
Author name:
زهراء شهاب احمد
Supervisor name:
مجيد خير الله راهي الزاملي
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Master
University:
Wasit University - Faculty Of Education - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Wasit
First pages:
01T4157 - p.pdf
Abstract:
The research topic is the (language standards for Ibn Faris and Asahah for fundamental study of the linguistic balance), came this research at the forefront and to pave the four chapters and a conclusion, dealt with in the boot definition Son of Persia and substantial, growing up, their elders, their pupils, etc... The first chapter was titled ( Budget curriculum) came in four sections, Section I, on sources of Ibn Faris and essential, the second Order article, the third section topic on the right and the ailing of the Acts, the fourth section for the user, scrapers of words, Chapter II (the budget in the morphological issues), came in three Investigation (firstpart issues For banking that which they agreed, (second section) morphological issues that differed in, (Section III) morphological issues alone essential Bzla, Chapter III (witness and martyrdom), Section I (the Koran and the Hadith), second topic words Arabs (poetry and proverbs ), A The fourth chapter (phenomena Tag is linguistic : derivation, synonymy, antibodies, co - verbal, Sculpture, be followed and expressed) the conclusion stated where the most important findings. The ibn fairs his dictionary section (language standards) to books and buildings dependent Alphabetical order on the basis of the first letter, and the gawhari door and rely Chapter system, based on the last letter. Establish Ibn Faris wordy ailing and Almanmozh place in the contiguous or close to, but essential, he devoted the last door of his dictionary of words and ailing Almanmozh.Ibn Faris put wordy neglected, did not refer to it, as well as essential,We have adopted the well - known sources, including oral What of Alab, including reliance on linguistic reliable sources. In separate morphological issues, there are issues of banking, in which they agreed, and Hmak banking issues where they disagree, the delegation himself by mentioning some of the fundamental morphological A.lmsail which did not mention Ibn Faris. In the separation of the evidence, I have martyred the Holy Quran and the Hadith, as well as the language of the Arabs of the hair and sayings but the largest proportion of martyrdom Kdbulgt Hair rate, and least cite parablesIn the separation of significance, was the theory of Ibn Faris in the genesis of language, which says that Toukavih language of God has not been recognized in tandem linguistic phenomenon, but it has said is essential to the meaning of words Chbr to synonymy.For the adoption of standards Ibn Faris on the system, so it was considered the phenomenon of antibodies and followers, and expressed Zawah original meaning, but the meaning of sub - Ibn Faris expansion in the phenomenon of sculpture as many counting all the extra Alavaz three that she carved, or placed a situation, or increased, essential differs in that it referred to the sculpture linguistic phenomenon, but he did not elaborate on that.The dictionary language standards a practical application of the phenomenon of derivation younger, essential pointed her but did not fleshed as Ibn Faris.
