الحجاج في شعر الصعاليك فـي العصـرين الجاهلي والامـوي
Author name:
جنان خالد ماهود الجواري
Supervisor name:
علاء جاسم جابر
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Literature
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Baghdad
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
01T4123 - p.pdf
Abstract:
The present research probes into the portrait of argumentation in AlSalik's poetry. The significance of this research derives from the crucial role played by argumentation in the active intellectual life. This research makes use of modern literary theories in examining AlSalik's poetry. Previous research has overlooked this issue examining other issues like the linguistic or rhetoric aspect of this kind of poetry. It is worth noted that most of AlSalik's poetry is full of argumentation, persuading attempts and submissiveness making it argumentative and far from being simple. This research has dedicated itself to the examination of this kind of poetry from the Pre - Islamic era to the end of Umayyad era. It is theoretical and applied research in nature falling into three chapters with an introduction. The introduction entitled "The Argumentation and its Development" tackles what is meant by argumentation and how it is evolved! Start with defining argumentation linguistically and technically, and following its historical development for westerners and easterners. Chapter one entitled" Elements of Argumentation" has three sections. Section one deals with the AlSaluk poet in the Pre - Islamic, Islamic and Umayyad eras and the reasons behind the emergence of such kind of poets like the poverty, the tribal system and self - conditions. Section two sheds light on the audience of the AlSalik's poetry such as the tribe and the people in the power position. And section three presents the subjects of AlSalik's poetry like adventures, elegies, praising, etc. Chapter two explains the different types of argumentation and arguments. It has two sections. Section one spots light on the various types of argumentation such as acting argumentation, interpreting argumentation and measuring argumentation. Section two deals with the two main types of argument based on Perelman's taxonomy. Chapter three, on the other hand, is divided into two sections. Section one lists the main mechanisms or techniques of argumentation adopted by these poets to persuade their audience including linguistic tools (such as lexical choices, argumentative conjunctions and some verbs), rhetoric tools (such as simile, metaphor and allegory) and metrics (such as antithesis, antonymy and metaphor). Section two is a detailed analysis of Alshanfri's poem shedding lights on his biography and the argumentative nature of his poem. It details the main techniques of argumentation used by the poet in persuading his audience. Finally, the research has been concluded with the main findings achieved highlighting that AlSalik's poetry is not naïve in its nature rather it is based on reasoning which affects the audience and their means.
