The Effect of Using Three - Step Interview and Talking Chips Techniques on Iraqi EFL Learners' Speaking Ability
Author name:
عمار كريم عطية
Supervisor name:
شذى كاظم مفتن السعدي
General topic:
Educational Sciences
Specific topic:
Methods of Teaching English Language
Degree:
Master
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Basic Education - Department Of Teaching Methods
Language:
English
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
05T3087 - p.pdf
Abstract:
In countries such as Iraq where English is taught as a foreign language, it is common to notice that in spite of the years of English language education, most students are unable to speak in a proper way. This fact has been documented by several studies on speaking ability in Iraq. Therefore, the researcher tackled this issue as an attempt to remedy it through using two new techniques which are Three - Step Interview and Talking Chips. The population of the present study is made up of fourth scientific preparatory male students in Baghdad Governorate, the third Directorate General of Education in Al - Rusafa. The sample of the study, which is chosen randomly, consists of three sections of the fourth preparatory male students at Al - Shaheed Qassim Al - Mubarqa’ Preparatory School. The total number of the sample was 128. Two of them are experimental and the third is control. Three - Step Interview is applied on the first section, while Talking Chips is applied on the second one. The third section is taught by using the prescribed method. The experimental design of this study is Non - Randomized Control Group Pre - test Post - test Design, which is one of the quasi experimental designs. The experiment lasted for two months during the academic year 2016 - 2017. It started on the eleventh of March and ended on the eleventh of May. The researcher himself taught all the three groups. Both of the pretest and the posttest were constructed by the researcher and exposed to a jury of experts to verify their validity. The first version of the pretest was applied on the pilot sample of 67 male students to estimate their discrimination power and difficulty level. M Reliability was calculated by using 'Inter - rater reliability'. The researcher applied the test on the pilot sample and then gave the test to another scorer (a regular teacher of English.) The correlation between the two scores was calculated by Pearson correlation. The result was 0.73. This indicates that the test has a high reliability. Pair - Samples t - Test was used to analyze the results of the comparison between the pretest and the posttest. It showed that there are statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the three groups in favor of the posttest. ANOVA test is applied on the posttest scores. It showed that there are statistically significant differences among the three groups in favour of the TSI and TCs. And to compare the three groups according to each speaking area (grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency and pronunciation), ANOVA test is applied again. If there is any significant difference, the Scheffe test is used to demonstrate the technique which has the greatest effect on it. As a result, the TSI technique is a more appropriate technique in teaching speaking than the TCs technique and the prescribed one since it develops each of the vocabulary, comprehension, fluency and the pronunciation of the students with high scores, while the TCs develops only the vocabulary and the comprehension, but with low scores. prescribed method development weak lower scores. In the light of the study findings, a number of recommendations are stated and suggestions for further studies are put forward
