الخلاف النحوي في كتاب المحصول في شرح الفصول لـ(ابن اياز البغدادي) (ت 681 هـ)
Author name:
احمد قاسم محمد الزاملي
Supervisor name:
عبد الحسن جدوع عبد العبودي
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language - Grammar
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Al-Qadisiyah - College Of Literature - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
Full text from the source:
https://qu.edu.iq/repository/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/%D8%A7%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%84%D9%8A.pdf
University location:
Qadisiyah
First pages:
01T4266 - p.pdf
Abstract:
After this long travel with the son of lbn Ayaz , and after the study and analysis of some of the issues of contention in the book ( chapters to explain the crop ) , came out a set of search results can be summarized as follows : 1)This study showed that the son of lbn Ayaz senior scientist in his art , and style developed in the light of the issued workshops teaching at the school Mustansiriya which was far - fetched , but on his knowledge of the credible and informed II ; and the quality of his works in the field of third language.2)Approved son lbn Ayaz many of the views espoused by son donor, and the exclusion of some of them depending on the strength of evidence.3)Approved son lbn Ayaz Alkoviin in seven issues including : providing excellence on the worker , and to provide the news is not it, and the rule of conscience fact, after Lula , leaving the exchange Nasrv , and the conscience of the chapter or baptism , and the worker in the name after F. Lord, and the work order , not likely an opinion on in the last two issues : conflict at work, and if the rule of Excluded Excluded mediate between him and described , visual and approved in other matters. 4)I found out from this study that the dispute between the Alkoviin very few if Macarnah issues of disagreement between the visual themselves , and perhaps the main reason for this is that Alkoviin did not have after Alexaii fur of scientists from his ability to develop towards Alkoviin , and this led to the survival of the case on what it says Alexaii fur , on the contrary doctrine Albesrien who were able to develop at them , and add to it a lot of explanations , and Altakrijat , so it seemed an integrated , and was probably the reason for this lack of what came to us from books Alkoviin , as the more views and reached us Using visual books , but this was more the views attributed to Alkoviin lacked accuracy and objectivity in some cases. 5)It is reached from the results of research and there are many opinions grammatical attributed to the later Mottagdma grammar, research proved reversible.6)indicated this study was to many of the works that the transfer of her son lbn Ayaz article grammatical and the names of the owners , and that most missing , but did not mention in more biographies and statements (such as explanation of explanation of Abdi , and explanation Aoun , a book coots to the son of paint , and the succession to the son reap ) , and others.7)proved this study that the son of lbn Ayaz action - oriented visual in more positions dispute while retaining his personality characteristic in the analysis, deduction , and the launch of the provisions , and the chapter on the differences , and this is evident in the light of the views of scientific , but it might take the view Alkoviin.8)shows the validity of the statements he attributes to Qa?lleha , but they are in some of them , were attributed inaccurate.9)that the dispute about ( God forbid ) a disagreement between grammarians not between the two schools - visual and keffiyeh - ie between grammarians whether or Besrien Kovyin , as well as the research found that ( God forbid ) and the characters are given a name and deed.10)This study showed that the son of lbn Ayaz They may say that by Sibawayh see know that science knowledge , as well as the proportion saying that I'm going to the OS that I know the name of the knowledge , while They suggest that knowledge of conscience know.12)This study revealed that the dispute over the conscience of the Chapter and General does not belong to its express , but the dispute is located in the renamed only , Valbesrion call it a chapter , and if so, it is not his place to express , and Alkovion call staking , and if so, it is also not replace him of expression , that is, when Gen. Alkoviin offset term visual separation when that's all there is to it , the dispute is not on the label.12)confirmed that the search waw called (b F. Lord ) is a special character has a unique use of it, there is the letter of sympathy , as seen Albesrion , and deputy of the Lord , as seen Alkovion.13)Search found that the question of the origin and the branch was Grammarians they work when they were consistent with the rules , but they do not work out if they do not agree , as stated in the 14)The question of yes and evil has disrupted the consensus , they were latecomers Gel by saying Basmitha to Alkoviin , and what exists in their books violates Mansp them.
