المصطلح النحوي في دراسات المحدثين == Grammatical Term In Modernizers'S Studie
Author name:
احمد خليل حبيب زنكنه
Supervisor name:
مكي نومان مظلوم الدليمي
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Diyala - College Of Education For Human Sciences - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Diyala
First pages:
01T4039 - p.pdf
Abstract:
There is no doubt that the terms that distinguish a section of science is an important matter without which concepts will be confused and become hard to be separated. This doesn't mean that these concepts should spin in the circle of terms but they must be linked with their semantics in the context. If we suppose that terms are the keys to the doors of the house, this means that the builder finish building that house. Resident has to either keep that building or divide it again. He might extend its limits or make it narrower. He might put other doors which will make different issues. Or, he might keep the doors but change the keys. The material of this study is found in books theses as well as researches especially those dealt with grammatical terms. Those researchers study these terms after deep searching. So, one can say that these studies are comprehensive. They depend on scientists'opinions and they search in such books as Al - Kitab, Al - Muktathab, Asul Al - Naho, Shareh Ibn Yaesh, Al - Rathi and others. This study doesn't care with all those who study the grammatical terms but it deals with those who study themseparately. And since there is a large number of sources so the researcher passed time factor and he doesn't restrict himself to a certain era in his study. Also, this study doesn't care with following up the industry of dictionaries of terms as they are too much. This might be a subject to independent thesis. The researcher chooses this titlefor two reasons : First, the grammatical term is a key to understand the texts and a door to enter science. Thus, searchingthese terms means reading all the grammatical subjects and then knowing the opinion of the early grammarians as well as the modern grammarians who study this subject.Second, it was the researcher's supervisor's Dr.MakiNaumanMathloom suggestion that this is a subject which isn't studied before and one that is worth studying. This study depends on many procedures starting with the historical one in documenting the researchers' thoughts and their study of grammatical terms of the early grammarians. It is done according to their historical series. This doesn't mean that our study will not concentrate on the study of grammatical terms of modern grammarians but,it deals with Grammar heritage such as Arabic dictionaries as well as the old sources. The second procedure is the criticism and analysis of these terms through the way of thinking of those scholars. Also, to highlighting the procedures of this study and through it the researcher presents and criticizes the opinion of those scholars under study. The study is divided into four chapters with an introduction and a conclusion. Those chapters are as follows : Chapter one : Rooting the Grammatical Terms. This chapter is divided into two sections,Section one : Rooting the Grammatical Terms in Al - Basriin's view, represented by,1. circumstantial phrases, predicate, adjective and adverbial object.2. sentence.3. the predicate of 'La' of negating gender.4. indeclinable for the object. 5. article and letter.Section two : Rooting the Grammatical Terms in Al - Kofiin's view, represented by,1. metonymy and surnamed.2.dogmatization.3.arrangement.Chapter two studies the correspondent terms in Al - Basriin and Al - Kofiinview and it is divided into three sectionsSectionone : Grammatical terms in AlBasriin's view.Section two : Grammatical terms in Al - Kofiin's view.Section three : the correspondent terms between Al Basriin and Al - Kofiin.In this chapter, the grammatical terms of AlBasriin and Al - Kofiinas well as the correspondent terms that are different in names but similar in concepts are studied. The opinions of the scholars their analysis of these terms are also studied.Chapter three presents the terms mentioned by scholars in form of books or researches that show the value of these terms. Chapter four, on the other hand, deals with the relationship between the grammatical terms and their semantics. Early grammarians pay attention to the semantics of terms. This chapter is also divided into three sections. The first one synonymous Grammatical Terms in Grammarians' view. This is done by mentioning grammatical termsfound by scholars while dealing with these terms. It seems that there are more than a term that has one concept and one meaning. That is called ''synonymity of grammatical terms''. The second section studies the shared grammatical terms between grammarians. Scholars follow up the nature of the terms and their effect on developing thegrammar lesson. The results is the multiplicity of meanings of the same term. The third section studies scholars' modern grammatical terms. The researchers borrow for these terms what scientists always tell ''terminology is indisputable''. They consider the idea of reformatting some terms according to the feature of universality of some early grammarians.Finally, the conclusion summarizes what the researcher reaches at and it is as follows : 1. It seems that some modern scholars found a confusion while studying some grammatical terms such as ''dogmatization'' and ''circumstantial phrases''.2. It seems that universality and particularity phenomena predominate the grammatical terms ( sentence, speech ) , ( article and letter) and others. 3. It seems that' synonymity of grammatical terms comes from modesty and agreement that terminology process aiming at in the nature of labels and titles. Synonymity of terminology hadn't been given a suitable account in this study. 4. Some scholars call for reviewing the titles and the concepts of the grammatical terms because of the overlapping among some terms.
