انتخاب مجلس النواب في دستور (2005) العراقي : دراسة مقارنة == Parliamentary Election In The Year (2005) Comparative Study
Author name:
نعيم زوير محيسن الساعدي
Supervisor name:
كاظم علي عباس الجنابي
General topic:
Law
Specific topic:
Constitutional Law
Degree:
Master
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Law - Department Of Public Law
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
13T1514 - p.pdf
Abstract:
There are differences between the citizens ,that came from their ethnic or classical societies or their parties , as well as their cultures or their thought or their psychological formatting and their advantages. Those advantages will be one unit and associated in one society , that the man has desire to belong to society to live , that he is social creative , His advantage to establish sustainable society and this needs authority to save those advantages. thus the authority must be established by the democracy and the definition of democracy Is the people rule themselves and the democracy had definite in the 17th century in Europe The democracy has three shapes * Directed Democracy , which is the people ruled themselves directly * The semi Directed Democracy , that be find representation boards to represent the people and the ruling by those boards.which return to the people when making decision * Representative democracy , which is establish on idea that this representative board making decision be hand the people. The democracy can be acted by election and choosing the Candidates to be representative to act the people in the parliament And the people can ask and rule the representatives Therefore , the democracy can keep the rights of the people specially the political rights. This regime gives grantee to the citizen to elect freely , and this right can't be done unless the freedom be grantee to all the people in general.The significance of this thesis The election operation must be formatted by three elements First : Voter , elector , is the most important one of them , that he is the reason for reaching the candidate to the parliament. Second : candidate , who has subjective conditions as the Egyptian or French legislators legislate. Third : the authority of the elections this authority must control the operation of the election. The problem of the thesis The operation of the election is not ideal on all levels and is not going by easy way in realty , because conflicted the interesting as to be collected the members who will make decisions and establish the main law of the state regime. Research MethodologyAs the election in Iraq is started in 2005 and associated with it some problems , we used the analytical method to write this thesis. and we compered it with Egypt and France and I give some results and comments. I will divided the study in the three chapters and after those I give Introductory chapter that talked about the political rights and it's kinds and the laws which ruled them. In the first chapter I had talked about the conditions of the voters and candidatesWhile the second chapter I talked the election operation and it's laws and the rules which organized it. In the third chapter I explained the appeal cases which are done in the special courts of the election included the election and Protest about the membership of the parliament also I had talked about the important results and the commend
