تقويم اسئلة كتب علم الاحياء للمرحلة الاعدادية وفقا لتصنيف جالاجر واشنر == Evaluation Of Biology Books Questions For Stage Junior High According To Gallager And Aschner Classification
Author name:
فاضل حمود جبر البيضاني
Supervisor name:
فاطمة عبد الامير عبد الرضا الفتلاوي
General topic:
Educational Sciences
Specific topic:
Methods of Teaching Life sciences
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Baghdad - Ibn Al-Haytham College Of Education For Pure Sciences - Department Of Educational And Psychological Sciences
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
05T2886 - p.pdf
Abstract:
هدف البحث الى تقويم اسئلة نهاية فصول كتب علم الاحياء للمرحلة الاعدادية في ضوء احد التصنيفات المعتمدة عالميا والمعروف بتصنيف جالاجر واشنر، ويمكن الافادة من نتائج البحث عن اعادة تنقيح او تاليف الكتب وخاصة اسئلة نهاية الفصول لادخال المستويات الاربعة للتص | Our research aims to evaluation the questions for the biology bookof the secondary school in the light of one of main classifications adopted universally known Gallagherand Aschner classification. The researcher believes that.this classification is very important for the following reasons : 1 - This is the first study in Iraq for the analysis of questions for the.Biology book of the seconday stagedue to the importance of this stage, which is a passport to universities and scientific life. 2 The search results can be used when a revision or re - writing books, especially the questionsat the end of chapters to introduce four levels of classification in future editions. 3 - To emphasize the importance of the questions and their effective role in the educational process, which is the cornerstone to understanding the scientific material between the covers of the book. 4 - Confirmation researcher on the comprehensiveness and credibility and objectivity of the questions through the results obtained to be taking in the future. The research frame Questions from the ends of chapters for biology books of the three levels in the Secondary stage. The research sample The research sample included three biology books of the preparatory stage. the number of key and subset questions is (615) distributed as follows : It was 161 key questions distributed as follows : 70 questions for the fourth year which new respnt 43% of the total number25 questions for the fifth scientificyearwhich is 16% and for the sixthscientific yearther are 66 questions which is 41%, while the total key questions, along with its subsidiaries were 615 questions distributed as follows : Fourth Scientific 141 question (23 %) as well as the for the fifth year the questions number is 140with percentage 23% finelly. for the sixth scientificyear the number of the questions is (334) with percent age(54%). Research tool The questions at the ends of the chapters wereclassified according to the four levels of Gallagher and Aschner classifcation (cognitive thinking, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, Evaluation thinking) The questions were classified according to the following : 1 - Determine the relative weight of the content areas of the three books in recent editions, which studied by the students for the academic year 2013 - 2014. 2 - determine the relative weight for Gallagher and Aschnerclassification. 3 - Extraction of objectivity and essay questions for each chapter of the book. 4 - Find the inclusion of questions of the goals and course material and content. 5 - Find the truth range of the content by comparing expected specifications table with theobserved specifications table. Research Results The researcher rcaches to the following results : 1 The average relative weights of the cognitive levels of Gallagher and Aschner classification for the biology books of for the preparatory level of thinking cognitive is (80%) and for the convergent thinking (19.18%), while the divergent thinking has reached (0.81%), we did not find any replicate of the level of eveluating thinking. This suggests that the High levels of thinking was not demoustvted in those books and that makes students where not familier on these types of questions. 2 - The repetition of objectivity questions was (330) paragraph (53.65%) while the repetition of essay questions was (285) paragraph (34.46%).The book that in to account the objectivity standard was takes book of the fifth grade.And then book of the sixth grade and finally the book of the fourth grade. 3 - The inclusion in the books for the Scientific Fourth and Fifth Grades has been very weak compared to the proportion of inclusiveness adopted the coverage proportion for the sixth yeam book was 84.3% The rate of the proportion of inclusiveness for all the three books was 87.68% 4 - The value of the coefficient of truthful content was very weak (0.446) when compared to what the experts think of the weights for each of the cognihve field of obsened specifications table. Recommendations In light of the research results.we necommendthe following recommendations : 1 An attention is needed for different levels of when preparing textbooks questions for the purpose of improvement and development. 2 The book questions should not be focus on the essay questions, as should include objective questions (multiple choice, matching fictures and the assertion and reason and others). 3 - The questions book should cover chapter headings in the textbooks. 4 - drafting additional questions at the end of each book of the three books take into account the standards of good questions according to the higher levels of thinking. 5 - need to adopt a specification table when preparing the questions and evaluate constantly. Proposals In light of this, the researcher suggested a number of proposals, including : 1 - conducting similar studies for the final and school exam questions for biology subject according to Gallagher and Aschner classification. 2 - conducting similar studies to the ends of chapters questions fro chemistry and physics for the secondery level. 3 - Conduct studies to show the difficulties that hinder the application of the upper levels of the evaluation like divergent thinking andevalute thinking for the exams in biology at the various stages of study
Summary:
05T2886 - A.pdf
References:
05T2886 - R.pdf
