الابعاد التداولية في شروح نهج البلاغة == Pragmatics in the Interpretations of Nahj Al - Balagha (Rhetoric Approach)
Author name:
محمد مهدي حسين
Supervisor name:
عبد الحسين علك المبارك
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University Of Basrah - College Of Literature - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Basrah
First pages:
01T5019 - p.pdf
Abstract:
Al - Balagha has been of great importance in the Islamic and humanitarian system since it was written by Al - Sharif Al - Ridia (rh) to the present day. This is due to its preoccupation with various aspects of life on the one hand, and for its author's great reputation from the other hand. Studies and research about this book has been still working. Many of the different achievements in the knowledge sectors come at the forefront of this approach (the interpretations of Nahj Al - Balagha) have represented a great cognitive treasure in various fields and research; linguistic, rhetorical, religious, and historical. Time has kept a number of those interpretations. In spite of the large number of studies and research that have been developed in the interpretations of the approach, most of them have been in the fields of (grammar, rhetoric, or signifier), as well as many of them limited to a specific explanation. The researcher has not noticed a study aims to interpret contemporary pragmatics; therefore, he has decided to write about (Pragmatics in the interpretations of Nahj Al - Balagha). The study concentrates on applying contemporary pragmatics automatically to the code of annotations, and to interpret what the scholars presented through their analytical model of the deliberative nature of the upper discourse. Due to many studies have been made in pragmatics, the study has left it to avoid repetition. Consequently, Introduction has focused on ( Changes in the Pragmatic approach in the Interpretaions of Al - Balagha). It discusses two significant points : text writing (Nahj Al - Balagha) and the chronological divergence between Al - Nahj and interpretations with reference to the difference in reading Al - Nahj by interpreters based on the deliberative approximations they adopted. The first chapter of the study is concerned with the descriptive dimension in the interpretations of Nahj Al - Balagha. It is divided into two sections. The first one deals with the interpretive methods and the interpretative practice based on the interpretive methods of the narrators (deletion, submission, delay, and referral). The second one (the intention between the statement and the hint) explains how interpreters addressed the purposes of discourses of the upper discourse based on the graphical aspect of eloquence (metaphor, simile, imagery, and symbolism). The second chapter explores the communicative dimension in the interpretations of Nahj Al - Balagha which is also divided into two sections. In the first section (communication variables and competencies), the researcher has presented the variables of the communication process between the discourse of the approach and the participants through the Jacobson plan, as well as as the deliberative competencies of the participants (linguistics and encyclopedias). While the second section focuses on (communication strategies) in the interpretations. It studied three strategies (implicit, guiding, and solidarity). The third chapter is devoted to analyzing the evidence dimension in the interpretations of Nahj Al - Balagha. It falls into two sections. Section one (the evidence indicators) demonstrates the issueof the imamate by the interpreters through the discourse of approach and their emphasis on the most important mechanisms of this evidence ((kinship, allegiance, text, knowledge, and courage). As for section two, it analyzes evidence and mechanisms of opposition dialogue) which is the debate and the evidence and the narration of the evidence. The thesis ends with conclusion sums up the findings of this study
