الطبيعة القانونية لعلاقة مجلس الامن بالمحكمة الجنائية الدولية == The Legal Nature Of The Relationship Between The Security Council, And The International Criminal Court
Author name:
ياسين طاهر حسن ياسر الياسري
Supervisor name:
كامل عبد خلف العنكود
General topic:
Law
Specific topic:
Public International Law
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
Al-Nahrain University - Collage Of Law - Department Of Public Law
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
13T1550 - p.pdf
Abstract:
انشات المحكمة الجنائية الدولية بموجب نظام روما الاساسي لعام 1998، ودخلت حيز التنفيذ في الاول من تموزعام 2002، كهيئة قضائية دولية مستقلة دائمة، تمارس اختصاصها على الجرائم الدولية التي نصت عليها المادة (5) من نظام روما الاساسي، بهدف ترسيخ المسؤولية الجن | Security Council established as a political body under the UN Charter, which is a central authority executive responsible on maintenance of international peace and security, the Charter of the United Nations has delegated the Security Council ((by the name of the peoples of the United Nations)) to do on behalf of the (the main consequences in the maintenance of international peace and security). So, to implement such major consequences effectively and quickly, the Security Council gave totalitarian powers and discretionary powers, has also been provided with a wide procedural system of measures.Te Security Council grew on the ruins of the Charter of the League of Nations to overcome the weakness of the first international organization. The Security Council considers as the only organ of the United Nations which able to issue binding decisions based on the provisions of VII of the Charter.The Provisions of the Charter also show that the Security Council is the executive authority Holding sanctions and measures in the Charter in all its forms, as the international institutions and bodies provided in the regulations that the punitive measures taken by these institutions and international bodies towards the State party, must be through the Security Council.Despite the fact that the International Criminal Court is an international treaty and is not an organ of the United Nations, was established under the Rome Statute of 1998 in order to enhance the principle of individual criminal responsibility, and shall consider the four crimes contained system to achieve the dream of humanity, often giving a greater role for international criminal justice and activating principle reduction of immunity granted by the internal criminal laws for the leaders and officials who are accused of the most serious crimes..And that this development has made the image of contemporary international law is very different from what it was under conventional international law when it was the country's relations to its people of considered as a left issues to their saved specialization , where the contemporary international law was imposed directly obligations on individuals by considering some of the behaviors crimes raises responsibility, also the importance of the individual increased on an international scale and added to the rules of international law dealt directly with many affairs of the individual and provided the legal safeguards for the enjoyment of those rights.The International Criminal Court followed the example of international institutions and bodies to give the role of the Security Council in its work by give it the right to refer the case to the prosecutor where it seems that one or more of these crimes have been committed, acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations under Item (b) Article (13) of the Rome Statute of 1998, It also gave the authority of the Security Council to defer an investigation or prosecution by the court under item (16) of the system mentioned above. So here we are in front of a political body to interfere in the work of the judicial affairs. Is this political interference will lead to the obstruction of justice International Criminal..?Therefore, this thesis titled with (the legal nature of the relationship between the Security Council with International Criminal Court are looking at this issue for the purpose of shedding more light on this relationship because they are the most important issues and most dangerous of the consequences of this relationship from the direct impact on the judicial work of the court after that this relationship provoked a difference and considerable debate among scholars of law and the judiciary and numerous positions and different views about the role played by the criminal Security Council before the criminal court, including his decree powers under the Rome Statute of 1998When some supported the Security Council to grant such powers, others intercepted them, and beware towards them because they think that it is restriction on the powers of the International Criminal Court and their specializations. Although the relationship between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court with a legal basis Rome is not the only one who codified this relationship,But that the Charter of the United Nations and the negotiated agreement of the relationship between the United Nations and the International Criminal Court are other additional sources clarified that relationship also the Security Council involved with the International Criminal Court in the role assigned to them, and on the conservation of international peace and security. And modernity of this subject to some extent, and the generality of what written about it, we found it is important for ourselves that to go in the depths of this subject, and we will search in most important fraction in this part, which si the legal nature of the relationship between the Security Council with the International Criminal Court, hoping that we succeed in that, we get to the required scientific findings of the research.
