الدولة البيزنطية : دراسة تاريخية في ضوء كتاب التاريخ السري لبروكوبيوس (500 - 565م) == The Byzantine State A HistoricaI Study in the Light of the Secret Book of the Procopius History ( 500_565 AD
Author name:
فرح عباس عياد كاظم
Supervisor name:
اسامة كاظم عمران الطائي
General topic:
History
Specific topic:
Islamic History
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Babylon - College Of Education For Human Sciences - Department Of History
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Babylon
First pages:
11T3340 - p.pdf
Abstract:
تعد الدولة البيزنطية التي تاسست في النصف الاول من القرن الرابع الميلادي ، واستمرارها في النصف الثاني من القرن الخامس عشر الميلادي ، امتدادا تاريخيا لاحد عشر قرنا , وكانت وريثة الامبراطورية الرومانية , وتعد فترة الامبراطور جوستنيان (Justinian) هي فترة تاريخية مهمة مشحونة بالاحداث والتطورات الداخلية والخارجية ، ونظرا لتاريخ الدولة البيزنطية , ونلاحظ اهتمام المؤرخين في ذكر الجانب السياسي والعسكري والعمراني تاركين وراءهم فجوة تاريخية لمعالجة الجانب الشخصي لحياة الامبراطور جوستنيان وزوجته ثيودورا (Theodora) وحاشية قصر الامبراطور التي كان لها اثر مهم في رسم الخارطة السياسية للدولة انذاك . لذا سنحاول دراسة المجال الشخصي او الامور السرية التي حدثت في بلاط الامبراطور بالاعتماد على مصدر كلاسيكي معاصر لاحداث القرن السادس الميلادي الا وهو بروكوبيوس (Procopius) فهو يعد المؤرخ الاول لعهد الامبراطور جوستنيان (527 - 565م) وكذلك المؤرخ العظيم لاعمال القائد العسكري بليساريوس(Belisarius) ومستشاره ، وبالنظر الى قرب بروكوبيوس للامبراطور والقائد بليساريوس كتب بروكوبيوس كتابا بحق هذين الاثنين وبحياتهم الشخصية وهو التاريخ السري (The Secret History) . كان كتاب التاريخ السري لمؤلفة بروكوبيوس عينة انطلقنا من خلالها لفهم مجريات التاريخ البيزنطي بوصفه شاهد عيان للاحداث ومعاصرا مع الامبراطور جوستنيان وملامسا لابرز شخوص امبراطورتيه, وعليه اتسمت كتاباته بانها مدونه بموجب مشاهداته الواقعية التي لا يمكن القول باطلاق انها كانت جميعها موضوعية ودقيقة الا انها محققة لتكوين صورة عن ماهية الواقع البيزنطي لاسيما الداخلي انذاك. بنيت الدراسة الكيفية التي مكنت جوستنيان لارتقائه العرش الامبراطوري بموجب صفات كان لها الاثر البالغ في تدعيم نفوذه وتثبيت دعائم دولته , التي كان لزوجته ثيودورا العامل المهم في توجيه جوستنيان الاداري وحتى العسكري بغض النظر عن انعكاسات هذا السلوك المتاثر بمحيطه الخارجي والمدعوم من زوجته في نكوص الاحداث التاريخية لحكمه الى درجة ان دون بروكوبيوس تلك الجرائم والاخطاء التي ارتكبها مقربو الامبراطور تجاه المؤسسات الادارية او عامة الشعب. | The Establishment of the Byzantine state in the first half of the fourth century AD, and its continuation in the second half of the fifteenth century AD, represented a historical extension of eleven centuries. It was the heir to the Roman Empire, and the Emperor Justinian's period is an important historical period fraught with events and developments. Internal and external, and given the history of the Byzantine state we note the interest of historians to mention their political, military and urban, leaving a gap and historical gap to address the personal side of the lives of Emperor Justinian and his wife Theodora and the foot of the Emperor's palace, which had An important impact in the drawing of the political map of the state at the time. Thus, we will try to study the personal sphere or the secret things that happened in the court of the emperor based on a classic contemporary source of the events of the sixth century AD (Procopius), which is the first historian of the reign of Emperor Justinian (527 - 565 AD), as well as the great historian of the work of the military commander Blessarios and his adviser, Prokopius wrote to Procopius the Emperor and the Commander of the Blessarios. Prokopius wrote a book about these two men and their personal life, the Secret History. This book was the basis of our study entitled "The Byzantine State : Historical Studies in the History of Procopius' Secret History" 500 - 565m). The study devoted attent to the academic scientific research, which is related to classical archeology, which is the most important historical tributaries in historical studies based on temporal theory and its proximity to events. The book of the secret history of Perkopius was a sample from which we began to understand the history of Byzantium as an eyewitness to the events and And his writing was characterized as a code by his realistic observations that can not be said by saying that they were all objective and accurate, but it is achieved to form a picture of what the reality of Byzantium Especially the internal level at the time. The study produced a number of conclusions that can be included in the following points : We did not find a direct and accurate account of the life of the author Berkopius at the social and family level. We have not found any texts that are indicative of his ethnicity, his family origin, and his influence in the intellectual formation, which became evident by the scientific achievement he left to the reader. Of the historical importance of them : The Book of Wars, which falls on eight parts, varied in its fields of study, Byzantium, Persia, Goths and Vandal. The book of buildings important in the diagnosis of the physical facilities left by Justinian of churches, hospitals and others embodied the place presented in Byzantium during the reign of the latter, which represented in this book a contradiction between his book and the other subject of study (secret history), which in its general nature turned and turned in the course Prakobius' pen, as a critic and bitter interpreter of the history of the ruling power, pointing to their shameful deeds and bad history. The study was designed to enable Justinian to elevate the imperial throne by virtue of qualities that had the profound effect of bolstering and consolidating the foundations of his state. His wife, Theodora, was the important factor in guiding Justinian, even military, regardless of the implications of this behavior, In the reversal of the historical events of his rule to such an extent that Percopius did not commit such crimes and errors committed by the emperor's associates towards the administrative institutions or the general public
