الجواز والمنع في كتاب الاصول في النحو لابن السراج (ت 316 هـ) == Permission And Prevention In Al - Usulfi Al.Naho For Ibn Al - Siraj (D. 3L6 A.H.)
Author name:
صادق فوزي دباس النجادي
Supervisor name:
عبد الكاظم محسن كاظم الياسري
General topic:
Arabic Language and Literature
Specific topic:
Language
Degree:
Doctorate
University:
University of Kufa - College Of Literature - Department Of Arabic Language
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Najaf
First pages:
01T4297 - p.pdf
Abstract:
The student of Arabic Language becomes acquainted with many of the linguistic phenomena of the four types : phonetics, syntax, semantics and declension through which he can establish a solid linguistic thought. Of these phenomena are the linguistic rules whichhave a great role in many aspects where the linguists and grammarians, who were interested in the sound speech, correct the speakers of the Quran's language.Of these rules I discussed the rules of prevention and permission which I studied depending on (Al - Osul fi Al - Nahu) by Ibn seraj (died in 316 A.H) for its scientific value and for containing the approach of both schools Al - Basrah and Al - Kufa.The nature of this research involved to be devided into two parts, each of which dealt with one of the mentioned rules. The first chapter is dedicated to permission which came in three chapters. As for the first one, it dealt with phonetic permission which included substitute, assimilation, inflections and el - imala.The second chapter is about the inflectional permission which included pluralizing, duatling femining forms and diminutive.The third chapter is grammatical permission which includes uninflectioning and inflectioning.The inflectioning included the nominatives, genitives accusatives, adverbs and adjectives, while the un - inflectioning included nouns, verbs and articles.The second part is about prevention which also included three chapters, first of which is phonetic prevention including substitution, assimilation and el - imala.The second is diptote declension which included the same themes included in diptote prevention.The third chapter is grammatical prevention which included the inflections and uninflections and all their contents. These parts are preceded by a preface in which I mensioned prevention and permission and their concet in the language and the reason they emerged. A conclusion following the two parts included the most significant results which the researcher reached depending on old and modern references those results are : - 1) Ibn Siraj used many ways of permission and prevention, this is aproof that the Arabic language is very comprehensive.2) Many of the linguistic and grammatical rules could be based on the Quran alone because it is obvious and it needs no discussion or argument but they depended on their standards related to the grammatical issues and they do not quote from the HolyQuran because it is very obvious. Even if they do not depend on it, they build the grammatical base on Quran and they provide examples from Quran to enhance their rules and whenever something in the Quran is against what they believe they try tointerpret it in a way that suits them. As for me I demand rewriting the grammar rules according to what cam in the Quran. I advise my colleagues of researchers to overcome the dispute among the grammatical schools because it is only a dispute over the rule written by the grammarian, if we only take a closer look we will see that there is dispute even among the grammarians of the same school and the same era, so it is better to study the difference and similarity of the same school
