دور رئيس الدولة في النظم العربية الوراثية البرلمانية : دراسة مقارنة بين المغرب - الاردن - الكويت == The Role Of The Head Of The State In The Arabic Hereditary Parliamentary A Comparative Study Morocco, Jordan And Kuwait)
Author name:
ايهاب رزاق عبد الحسين
Supervisor name:
ناظم نواف ابراهيم الشمري
General topic:
Political Science
Specific topic:
Political Systems and Public Policies
Degree:
Master
University:
Mustansiriyah University - Faculty Of Political Science
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
14T654 - p.pdf
Abstract:
تناول موضوع الدراسة الموسومة(دور رئيس الدولة في النظم العربية الوراثية البرلمانية : دراسة مقارنة بين المغرب - الاردن - الكويت), الصلاحيات الدستورية لرئيس الدولة, نظرا لما يتميز به من صلاحيات دستورية واسعة, جعلت منه محورا للنظام السياسي, وصاحب الدور الفاعل و| Dealt with the subject of study entitled (the role of head of state in the genetic Arab systems Parliamentary : a comparative study between Morocco, Jordan and Kuwait), the constitutional powers of the king, because of the characteristic of the king in the parliamentary system of constitutional powers and wide, made him the focus of the political system, and his active and influential role on other institutions, official and semi - official both types, compared with the other parliamentary systems, this distinction enjoyed by the kings since the start of the treaties contract between the rulers and the authority of the pre - colonial independence, and then it was constitutionally entrench after independence. The study was divided into three quarters, introductory chapter first the genetic system in the Arab kingdoms, while the second quarter included the constitutional authority of the king in Morocco, Jordan, Kuwait, and the third quarter compared to ensure the King's role in the parliamentary system in the same countries. The study found a number of results, including the convergence of the constitutional powers of the King (Head of State) in the parliamentary system of these countries, we find that the constitutions gave the king a strong powers exercised in normal and exceptional circumstances, and these circumstances do not remember the nature but to leave the king discretion identified, and this what made him to exploit this aspect in consolidating his power and devoted constitutionally, and the liquidation of liabilities opponents to the authority of the monarchy, but after that the heads of these countries found recognition of all political parties to the primacy of the Royal institution and Her Highness, they give the largest space in the political practice of the various political forces in the country, with sufficiency framing the role of political action in the country, and to exercise the role of arbiter between the state institutions as long as the Royal institution enjoys superiority formal and objective. There is variation in the characteristics of each system, with characterize the role of the King from the other system also observes, In Morocco, the King granted the authority of Commander of the Faithful and the Supreme Representative in the country, which would make it tamper some constitutional provisions as strengthens the authority, and in Jordan is set to the Senate by the King, exercise the powers equal to the authority of the council elected directly by the people, and Kuwait's sovereign government and its ministries, the preserve of the royal family, it is not a vote of confidence by without the approval of the Prince.
