دراسة زاوية تعشق العدة في عمليات التفريز == Studying Tool Engagement Angle In Milling Process
Author name:
ليث فاضل شاكر
Supervisor name:
ليث عبد الله محمد
General topic:
Production engineering metallurgy and materials
Specific topic:
Production Engineering
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Technology
Language:
English
University location:
Baghdad
First pages:
50T188 - p.pdf
Abstract:
هذه الاطروحة تعنى بدراسة تاثير زاوية تعشيق العدة بالمشغولة على ستراتيجيات ونتائج عمليات التفريز بالعدد ذات النهايات المسطحة. تم تصميم نموذجين (CAD model) باستخدام برنامج (Solid work 2013) الاول على شكل كونتور خارجي والاخر على شكل بوكيت داخلي وبعد ذلك تم | This work focuses on the effect of controlling tool engagement angle (TEA) on the milling process planning and the results of end milling operations. Two CAD models has been designed by using Solid Work 2013 software, then G - code have been generated and simulated by using Surfcam V5 software with (Fanuc post processing). AL7075 - T6 alloy has been used for its high machinability, dry machining (no coolant) has been done on 3 - axes milling machine (C - tek) available in the University of Technology Training and Workshop Center.Feeds, speeds and other machining parameters (axial and redial depth of cut) have been selected according to machining handbooks recommendations. Machining of workpieces has been accomplished by using two techniques (two types of tool - path), first one was conventional tool - path machining (contour parallel tool - path), and the second was by using TRUEMILL technique (true engagement controlled tool - path) by Surfcam V5. Thirty experiment have been designed, four of them have been failed, ten have been accomplished and the others neglected for reasonable causes as it will be discussed. Finally a comparison between the two techniques has been made focusing on machining time, material removal rate, cutting temperature and surface roughness. The results confirm that TEA control leads to reduce machining time, we have a time reduction in about (80%) for contour machining and (57%) for pocket machining. Cutting heat was under control though the feeds and the axial depths of cut went higher, also by controlling tool engagement angle we skipped the cause of failure of some experiment in conventional tool - path machining. Surface roughness was not that affected by controlling tool engagement angle, the minimum surface roughness in hand is (0.43 µm), it is higher than the best result of a previous work for the same material by 50%.
