اثر التعريفات في تنقيح القاعدة الاصولية
Author name:
هبة محمد شنان كاظم
Supervisor name:
ضرغام كريم كاظم الموسوي
General topic:
Islamic Sciences
Specific topic:
Islamic Sciences
Degree:
Master
University:
University of Kerbala - College Of Islamic Sciences
Language:
Arabic
University location:
Karbala
First pages:
00T1634 - p.pdf
Abstract:
sciences, in the multiplicity of their topics, lacks the knowledge of the fundamentals, especially the religious one, in the field of legal provisions. Usul al - fiqh science has a very great significance in the development of islamic jurisprudence science . Without this science, one can says that the principle of islamic jurisprudence won’t be settled and it won’t be as this good tree that gives its fruits all the time. In Usul alfiqh science ,there is is alot of differences in its particles and their implications , and this research focused on the effect of these differences in definition ,as it is a clarification of the thing to be revealed , and the impact of such differences in the construction of fundamental rules that produced different provisions of legitimacy resulted in the effects of which the search have showed some of them in the different definitions of Alsunnah alshraifa,for instance, that led to the establishment of two sunns which are Ahlulbayt (Peace be upon them) and venerable sunns that resulted in the existance of the two different legal provisions for the same matter.The difference in the definition of Usul al - fiqh science was that it is a blocker collector .The difference in command, prohibition, derivatives, resulted in several types effects of legitimate government predictive .The difference in the consensus led to the existence of several types of it such as the consensus of Ahlulbayt ( peace been upon them) and its provisions , the consensus of venerable and their provisions, the consensus of the city and its provisions , the consensus of the people of the city and their provisions , the difference in the mind and what is derived from the judgments and differences in the conflictbetween the evidence and its impact on the resources of the customary assembly falls within the contradiction or not . The differences in acceptance and its impact, as it is counted by some scientists as it is based on knowledge of legitimacy or practical function and counted by other scientists as it is within the practical assets and the consequent differences in places of conflict and others. The difference in the origin of the patent and thetaking of it . the one who says its argument takes the practical function of the.
